Slashdot Mirror


Trip To Mars Could Damage Astronauts' Brains

Hugh Pickens writes writes "Alex Knapp reports that research by a team at the Rochester Medical Center suggests that exposure to the radiation of outer space could accelerate the onset of Alzheimer's disease in astronauts. 'Galactic cosmic radiation poses a significant threat to future astronauts... Exposure to ... equivalent to a mission to Mars could produce cognitive problems and speed up changes in the brain that are associated with Alzheimer's disease' says M. Kerry O'Banio. Researchers exposed mice with known timeframes for developing Alzheimer's to the type of low-level radiation that astronauts would be exposed to over time on a long space journey. The mice were then put through tests that measured their memory and cognitive ability and the mice exposed to radiation showed significant cognitive impairment. It's not going to be an easy problem to solve, either. The radiation the researchers used in their testing is composed of highly charged iron particles, which are relatively common in space. 'Because iron particles pack a bigger wallop it is extremely difficult from an engineering perspective to effectively shield against them,' says O'Banion. 'One would have to essentially wrap a spacecraft in a six-foot block of lead or concrete.'"

10 of 505 comments (clear)

  1. water, not lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wrapping the ship in water frozen or not, is a far more practical protection measure than wrapping it in lead.
    You can do a lot more with water once you get there.

  2. duh by bnoel · · Score: 5, Funny

    tin foil hats... duh...

  3. Re:Another reason we're stuck on this blue planet by I+Read+Good · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, you're right. We should just give up.

  4. Not that big a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    a 6' shield of concrete? Why not hollow out asteroids that are near our orbit, and adjust their orbit to transit between earth and mars?

  5. Re:Another reason we're stuck on this blue planet by virgnarus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once you leave the atmosphere of this blue planet, *everything* will kill you.

    This is why I believe Australia is not native to our world.

  6. Re:Another reason we're stuck on this blue planet by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The sensible thing to do is to build the craft in space. Then the mass of the vehicle really isn't that much of an overarching concern.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. Re:Another reason we're stuck on this blue planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you a complete an utter moron? Moderation in no way took away your right to free speech. Heck, deleting your comment would not be a violation of your rights either, but that would be harder to explain to you.

    Your comment added nothing to the discussion, and you got modded down. Get over it and quit crying.

  8. Re:The Trap, Yourself by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are stuck here. There is no escape.

    You might be, but all the trapping being done is by your own mind, not any kind of scientific basis.

    Talk is cheap. Show me your spaceship.

    Replace "spaceship" with "aeroplane" and you'd fit right in with Orville and Wilbur's dissenters.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  9. Re:Another reason we're stuck on this blue planet by Sperbels · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No amount of engineering, terraforming, or any other science fiction magic will ever make any other body within human reach survivable for long, and certainly not without HEAVY and CONSTANT support from earth.

    Seems to be similar to ridiculous statements like:
    “Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible.” — Lord Kelvin

    “The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” — Ernest Rutherford, shortly after splitting the atom for the first time.

    “There is practically no chance communications space satellites will be used to provide better telephone, telegraph, television, or radio service inside the United States.” — T. Craven, FCC Commissioner

    “To place a man in a multi-stage rocket and project him into the controlling gravitational field of the moon where the passengers can make scientific observations, perhaps land alive, and then return to earth - all that constitutes a wild dream worthy of Jules Verne. I am bold enough to say that such a man-made voyage will never occur regardless of all future advances.” — Lee DeForest

    And it goes on and on.

  10. irradiation wasn't quite the same as a mars trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the paper, you noticed that they irradiated the mice very quickly.

    "using a foam tube holder positioned at the center of a 20×20 cm beam of iron ions accelerated to 1 GeV/ at a dose rate ranging from 0.1–1 Gy/min. Male mice received total doses of either 10 cGy or 100 cGy. Female mice received only a 100 cGy dose."

    1Gy/min is a lot dose in a very short period. So for the female they gave all the dose in a timeframe measured in mins. At lower dose rates, cells repair the DNA damage better. I think that lower dose rates would be more likely to occur in a mars trip.

    For those without much radiation background, 100cGy delivered in 1 min isn't the same as 100cGy delivered over 6 months.