Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Gets an Open Source Educational Manual

Last year a group of UK teachers started working on a Creative Commons licensed teaching manual for the Raspberry Pi. That work has produced the Raspberry Pi Education Manual which is available at the Pi Store or here as a PDF. From Raspberry Pi: "The manual is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 unported licence, which is a complicated way of saying that it’s free for you to download, copy, adapt and use – you just can’t sell it. You’ll find chapters here on Scratch, Python, interfacing, and the command line. There’s a group at Oracle which is currently working with us on a faster Java virtual machine (JVM) for the Pi, and once that work’s done, chapters on Greenfoot and Geogebra will also be made available – we hope that’ll be very soon."

4 of 56 comments (clear)

  1. Khan Academy Lite by mbuimbui · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are looking to get free educational materials on a Raspberry Pi you should check out: http://kalite.adhocsync.com/. Intern Jamie Alexander did a fabulous job getting the entire Khan Academy site including setting up accounts, watching videos, and doing exercise problems working on a Raspberry Pi. You can read about it here: http://jamiealexandre.com/blog/2012/12/12/what-i-did-at-khan-academy-khanberry-pi-ka-lite/

    1. Re:Khan Academy Lite by jamalex · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thanks for the link! We're working on a package to put into the RPi store, to make it even easier -- stay tuned for more soon!

  2. For 8yr+: Scratch, Python and Bash in that order. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The last python chapter is a actually useful with some GPIO stuff with python.
    Just in case anyone else was curious.

  3. Open Source? Not really, I think. by dido · · Score: 2, Informative

    CC-BY-NC-SA is not open source, not by the traditional definition of open source. The NC part of the license is the problem. Open Source licenses should permit commercial redistribution, and this is in fact part of the first criterion given in the definition of an open source license:

    The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.

    (emphasis added) The NC portion restricts selling the manual. It isn't a free cultural work either for the same reason.

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.