Slashdot Mirror


Who Would Actually Build an Ubuntu Smartphone?

Nerval's Lobster writes "When Canonical whipped back the curtain from its upcoming Ubuntu for smartphones, it set off a flurry of blogosphere speculation about the open-source operating system's chances on the open market. But which company would actually build such a device? Apple and Research In Motion and Nokia are all out of the running, for very obvious reasons. Motorola, as a subsidiary of Google, is also unlikely to leap on the Ubuntu bandwagon. While Hewlett-Packard has flirted with smartphones in the past, most notably after its Palm acquisition, the company doesn't seem too focused on that segment at the moment. That leaves manufacturers such as HTC, which currently offer devices running either Google Android or Windows Phone. But given Android's popularity, it might prove difficult for Canonical to convince these manufacturers to do more than release a token Ubuntu device—especially if Google and Microsoft apply counter-pressure."

16 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. Who cares? by MacDork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Give me a ubuntu rom that works and I'll install it myself.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... case closed ...

      No, dammit, keep that case open! I want to put in an aftermarket battery. I have my soldering iron right here.

    2. Re:Who cares? by jareth-0205 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Give me a ubuntu rom that works and I'll install it myself.

      Yeah, I talked to a Ubuntu guy at an Android conference about this who was showing off a dual Android-Ubuntu runnin Mororola Atrix II. His position was fairly much 'no', since they want to sell this to manufacturers as a feature they can have. Shame, though I can see their point of view.

    3. Re:Who cares? by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...and yet the anti-Googlers on Slashdot were assuring us, yesterday, that the huge advantage of this system is that it would be "truely open" rather than Google's "impossible to fork" Android...

      You know, they still haven't released Ubuntu for Android to the public, and that's a much more interesting project. I'm not holding out for this to ever be released, despite the plethora of open phones we have these days and the supposed use of an Android kernel.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Who cares? by SolitaryMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Same here.

      I think this is the right strategy to let geeks play with it first and solve all the problems. THEN try to sell it to the general public.

      Personally, I would definitely want to try this. Hell, I would even buy a new device for this, if needed.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    5. Re:Who cares? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think this is the current plan:

      The new mobile OS will presently only work on the Google Nexus Phone, (the one which was released by Samsung). Ubuntu will release an open-source code as a file and users can install it on their Nexus phone. The OS will replace Android once you install it.

    6. Re:Who cares? by Miamicanes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      UbuntuPhone is technically a parasite on Android (because it depends on Android's make-believe-open hardware to make it past the gatekeepers doing their best to control American mobile networks), but it's likely to end up as a symbiotic relationship. My guess is that if Ubuntu Phone is viable 5 years from now, it'll basically be a native-code framework that wraps Android. Your 'launcher' app will be native "Ubuntu", but you'll have at least one instance of DalvikVM spawned and running in the background on one or more cores, and 97% of the apps running on an "Ubuntu" phone will be Android anyway.

      It might even be a good thing for both Google AND Canonical. Google still gets politely ignored by Qualcomm (mostly because Qualcomm owns enough IP to make it nearly impossible to build a CDMA phone that can legally be sold in the US without using their chips, so Google's threats to take Motorola's business elsewhere ring hollow), but Canonical has one strength that Google has kind of been teetering a bit at lately... it still has a dominant CEO who's a kind of a loose cannon. Google hasn't been pwn3d by Wall Street, but they're big enough now that they have to at least go through the motions of pretending they care what institutional investors want. Shuttleworth can still openly say and do things that would get Google hauled in front of the SEC, FTC, and/or Congress for corporate blasphemy.

  2. Can I run it on my old phone? by eksith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm still waiting for a simple, pain-free, way to turn my old phones (not just Android ones) into simple general purpose computers by wiping the existing ROM. Cyanogenmod isn't available for my clunker.
    Isn't that sad? A state-of-the-art piece of technology is only a clunker because its handicapped.

    --
    If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    1. Re:Can I run it on my old phone? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't that sad? A state-of-the-art piece of technology is only a clunker because its handicapped.

      Tell me about it...
      -- Stephen Hawking

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Can I run it on my old phone? by Psyborgue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I made that mistake the first time I bought a smartphone. It's running CM10, and i'll probably bring it higher than that until it ceases to be supported, but it's not an easy device to install a custom ROM on. For me it's Nexus from now on. At least then I know the boot-loader is going to be unlock-able and i'll probably get official updates for a very long time if I choose to go that route (i'm currently doing that with my Nexus 7, which I love).

  3. Many of us welcome true mobile computing... by paulsnx2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would like to do actual development on a smart phone, and why not? It has more hundreds of times the computing power of mainframe I, as a student, shared with the entire university!

    I want an app that lets me use any computer and keyboard to connect to my phone, and use it as a gateway to the cloud, to hold my personal work, etc.

  4. Re:The real question is by Psyborgue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ubuntu is too popular to be cool here. As soon as something becomes popular, it ceases to be cool. Yeah yeah, unity sucks balls bla bla bla... but you don't have to use that window manager. Canonical has made Ubuntu successful. I'm not happy about the Amazon thing either, but you can at least turn it off (and I might not even, as I do shop on Amazon).

  5. Re:build your own by war4peace · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now it's called "The Chinese".
    They offer you any combination of software and hardware you would like, from what's freely available, for a small price. There are zounds of companies selling cheap, branded devices which are simply customized generic devices onto which some generic Android version has been installed. All it takes for Ubuntu for Mobiles is to be flexible enough to allow itself to be slammed onto those generic devices. Screen Resolution from X*Y pixels to Z*T pixels, accelerometer support, 3G Support, USB Dongle Support, etc. and you're done.

    here in Romania we have Allview which offers cheap phones and tablets, with Android 4.0.4 and above. A dual-SIM (both SIMs working at the same time) device costs about 160 USD retail price, no strings attached. Of course, you don't get an exquisite hardware quality but at this price you can't ask for it, really. Those devices work, they do their stuff well enough.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  6. Re:don't get the cart before the horse by lpevey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The thing is, a year or two ago, I would have bought one. Until recently, I ran Ubuntu as my primary desktop since Dapper (before that, I was a RedHat person), so you would think I would be part of the primary target group. But, if my own feelings are in any way indicative, this is going to be a very tough sell. Even I gave up hope for Ubuntu (and linux) after numerous annoyances and bugs...things were getting worse each year, not better.

    - The Ubuntu One annoyance started it for me.
    - The Gnome 3 fiasco. "We just don't care what our users think. If we build it, they will come. Oh, wait, don't leave... Come back!" Nope, we're gone.
    - The Unity fiasco. Worse than Windows 8. Really. (OK, I'll be honest: I haven't used Windows 8. It could be just as bad. But it's bad.)
    - The Amazon search fiasco. Wow. Privacy, anyone?
    - The ongoing hostility toward anything closed being available on linux (because god forbid we users actually have a choice).

    Given the last two items, why would a nerd who is protesting Apple's closed system ever want to choose Ubuntu?

    Nerds like to tinker. We pride ourselves on it. But we also pride ourselves on using the best tool for the job. That is no longer Ubuntu.

    Ubuntu is completely misreading their market.

    My switch: I have been using Win 7 for about 6 months now, and I love it. There are also smaller smaller things that I didn't even notice were wrong until I switched: When transferring large files on my network with NFS, I always got random Nautilus crashes from time to time. I just assumed it was my router or something, and never really had time to look into it. I lived with it. No such issues with Windows 7 shares. Dragging and dropping large folders from one computer to another has never been easier for me. I could kick myself for being so stubborn that I didn't switch sooner.

  7. Re:don't get the cart before the horse by Patch86 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would buy one, I think, depending on details. Since the death of MeeGo, there hasn't been a serious GNU/Linux based phone on the market. If Ubuntu can deliver a phone with something approaching the same feature set as they do in their full desktop distro, then it would be exactly what I've always wanted from a Smartphone.

    I know you're being snide, but a reminder that Ubuntu is still the most popular Linux distro; although it is no-longer flavour of the month with the Slashdot crowd, it still has a large enough following to be a serious player.

    And hey, Unity is always being criticised as looking like a phone/tablet OS shoehorned onto a desktop...

  8. Re:The real question is by Psyborgue · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you saying a more advanced user isn't capable of installing and using an alternative window manager or running a very simple command to disable Amazon searches? I get what you're saying and you have a valid point, but what's going on here is a lot more than just complaining about Ubuntu's focus. It's seemingly an opposition to Ubuntu for anybody. It's throwing the one hope for Linux on the desktop under the bus on idealistic and group-think grounds. It's unrealistic idealism, elitism and smug superiority. There will always bee niche distros and even Linux from scratch if you really want, but it doesn't make Ubuntu bad, or even a bad choice for power-users / developers.