Slashdot Mirror
Google Gives Up Fight Against Chinese Censorship
judgecorp writes "Google has abandoned its policy of warning Chinese users against keywords that trigger censorship. The search giant had added a warning that advised Chinese users not to use search terms that could cause the Chinese authorities to shut off their access to Google, but has now abandoned these warnings. While Google says they were ineffectual, free speech campaigners have expressed disappointment."
Now, if you want to complain about somebody, complain about the People's Republic of China. It's THEIR laws and policies which make this a threat to free speech, not Google's capitulation to the lawful government of China.
Google was warning people before they searched. Who reads the fine-print before starting these days.
What they could do, is on any search that used a keyword, make the warning the first result.
Example :Search Tuna:
1) Tuna is a trigger search word used by China to start investigations into users.
>
2) Tuna are a great food to eat
Google isn't acclimating to their culture, I think they just realized that triggering the ire of the Chinese government is much less profitable than the alternative.
Would you say it isn't anyone's job bring censorship to light, and that it's up to Americans individually to understand, and to obey or rebel as he/she sees fit? I'm quite certain in that case you'd disagree, and you'd likely counter-argue that the individual's attempt to enlighten him/herself without help is a futile act in the presence of a state which has so much control on media and information. If that could be true of the US, why would that not be even more so of China?
your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
...they do so to support a f*cking mega corporation that would sh*ts on them at a moments notice, for chance of extracting a few extra dollars from the customers. Google withdrew *alone* from China in a response to "evil"...What did they do when "Human Rights Watch praised the decision and urged other firms to follow suit in challenging censorship...on yeah right I remember *nothing*...Lets call them Microsoft who at the time by the "the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ...sharply criticized Microsoft for continuing to be complicit with China's censorship laws"...what about Apple??. Acting Alone Googles strategy was weak/stupid.
Make 'em your BUSINESS MODEL.
Google, selling you out since 2003.
Rainey Reitman of the Electronic Frontier Foundation said that technically, it is indeed all legal, but she emphasized that people don't really understand how their random thoughts, disclosures or opinions on social media may be exploited.
"I think people don't realize when they sign up for these sites that the government is going to be routinely monitoring and sifting through this data," she said.
"If Coca-Cola is reading all my tweets," Dan Zarrella points out, "it's not as scary as if the DOD is reading all my tweets, right?"
http://www.defensenews.com/article/20121113/DEFREG02/311130003/Unwitting-Sensors-How-DoD-Exploiting-Social-Media
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
Using SSL is ineffective, because the Chinese firewall active sends connection reset packets to disrupt your SSL connection.
What did they do when
Who is they? the same people both times?
what about
We already knew they were evil. Google claimed not to be. They lied.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
there are plenty of cultural differences that are ok
but violating people's basic rights can not be justified with references to culture
this applies to problems in the west too, i'm not singling out china
you can't say chinese people are happy being slaves, so let them be, it's just culture. or muslim women are happy being slaves, so let them be, it's just culture. or poor people in western nations leaning towards social darwinism as plutocrats warp the politics are happy being slaves, so let them be, it's just culture
bullshit
NO ONE is happy being a slave. culture is no excuse
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
There is no reason to assume that Google isn't "providing unfiltered results". I see no evidence they have ever filtered results for China. In fact, as I recall, that's why they moved their servers out of China.
Why are you claiming they are censoring results? What TFA is about is Google decided to stop warning Chinese users that specific key words would trigger Chinese government censoring (and possibly worse). Shall we assume that Google found the warning was useless?
But I see no evidence that Google is doing any censoring or filtering.
> It's China. You're not going to change their mind. You will disappear forever before you win something against the government.
Maybe. But I think History proves you wrong. With enough people you WILL be remembered.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989
China IS changing. Their corruption and censorship can't last forever no matter how hard they try. Don't confuse lack of external progress with lack of internal struggle.