Slashdot Mirror
Anonymous Helps Find Evidence In Gang Rape Case
jfruh writes "Evidence of a gang rape committed by members of an Ohio high school football team, including video, was, in the way of digital native teenagers today, put online on various social media sites — and was quickly taken down as students began realizing the magnitude of the situation. The hactivist group Anonymous has been able to find archived and cached versions of the damning content, which may help prosecutors make their case." (The original story from December at the New York Times adds more detail.)
In the process, Anonymous successfully managed to get the accused released by tainting the evidence. Congratulations, assholes.
"Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet (Spaceballs)
lured the girl to a party under false pretenses,
Girl must have thought parties are for studying algebra
drugged her
Girl apparently mistook drugs for vitamins
Not to say that a crime didn't happen, but using language casting it as some sort of genius criminal plan confuses the safety warning for girls that used to be common sense, but going out unsupervised with boys and getting shitfaced on illegal substances is now considered an inalienable freedom for even little girls.
It is well known that women do not go to bars to get laid; they go to bars to have fun>
The only "fun" they're going to have is by dangling sex in front of the males, therefore they are in fact going out to get laid. All resistance, all cock-blocking, is either token or part of the selection process.
In what way is cutting off someone's genitals proportional to rape? That's a pretty brutal response.
Instead, rape the raper, film it, and post it to the internet. That would be an eye for an eye.
BTW...there's a big difference between what happened in India which was violent and evil with the intent to harm/kill which went far beyond rape vs the kind of rape that involves having sex with a passed out girl.
My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
You know...I hear this all the time, but I have a hard time buying it..at least in most cases.
Sure if you shove something else in a woman besides a hard dick....I can see that it isn't a sex act for the most part (although some people get off on that).
But if it is a male fucking a female, well, he has to be sexually aroused in order to perform the act, no?
Sure there may be some other thoughts going on there too...fantasy, anger, etc...but it is fundamentally a sexual act and could not be performed with a limp dick if the male in question was not sexually aroused.
And I think we're also seeing more these days...women who were willing at the time...who either right near the end, or even after the act yell "rape"....which isn't fair to the guy, especially after it is done and over with, yet he is still in a world of shit legally.
But if a true rapist doesn't get turned on by women, then I cannot see how he could physically complete the act if not sexually aroused, by definition, making it a sex act/ sex crime.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........