Nokia Admits Decrypting User Data Claiming It Isn't Looking
judgecorp writes "Nokia has admitted that it routinely decrypts user's HTTPS traffic, but says it is only doing it so it can compress it to improve speed. That doesn't convince security researcher Gaurang Pandya, who accuses the company of spying on customers."
From the article, Nokia says: "'Importantly, the proxy servers do not store the content of web pages visited by our users or any information they enter into them. When temporary decryption of HTTPS connections is required on our proxy servers, to transform and deliver users' content, it is done in a secure manner. ... Nokia has implemented appropriate organisational and technical measures to prevent access to private information. Claims that we would access complete unencrypted information are inaccurate.'"
The point is... you can find a browser that doesn't fuck you over and use that.
And you can find a phone that doesn't take advantage of you and use that. The trouble is, this sort of "doesn't take advantage of you" isn't exactly a selling point among the mass market, which means a product like this won't be produced for a mass-market price.
for things like, say, open source browsers, you can read the code and see what it is doing.
But do most people verify that the binary they download matches the source code? And do they diverse-double-compile their compiler toolchain to make sure it isn't infected with a "Reflections on Trusting Trust"-style virus? I'm under the impression most end users take this on faith.