Slashdot Mirror
Windows RT Jailbreak Tool Released
An anonymous reader writes "Earlier this week, reports surfaced that the Windows RT operating system had been jailbroken to allow for the execution of unsigned ARM desktop applications. Microsoft quickly issued a statement saying it does not consider the findings to be part of a security vulnerability, and applauded the hacker for his ingenuity. Now, a Windows RT jailbreak tool has been released."
what'sthat?
A new and innovative way to lock hardware to only the applications that you want your users to run.
*sips coffee*
Oh, and apparently it failed to live up to the owners expectations to be locked down.
Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
Kudos to MS for being good sports about it.
We applaud the ingenuity of the folks who worked this out and the hard work they did to document it. We’ll not guarantee these approaches will be there in future releases.
Translation: Thank you for carefully documenting how you jailbroke our new operating system. Your documentation will help us close that hole, even though it poses no security risk.
Actually Microsoft had the same response, after thinking a bit, to the jailbreaking of Windows Phone 7. No matter how hard you try, if one human, or group of humans, comes up with a protection scheme, another will figure out a way through or around it. Nature of the beast and the sooner others (Sony!?) get a clue, the sooner everyone can start thinking of more innovative things to do rather than waste resources this way.
"[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
allow for the execution of unsigned ARM desktop applications
Awesome! Quick, somebody write some applications!
And then you end up in the situation jailbreakers are with iOS 6. There is still no jailbreak for the platform. And when one is released, Apple will patch it.
Playing silly cat and mouse games with vendors that do this is effort and time wasted. If you see value in using devices you purchase as you see fit, then buy from vendors that don't deliberately interfere with you and make those devices and the software for them better.
I'm sure the three people using windows rt are grateful.
Most people who jailbreak don't do it for the value: they do it for the challenge. I doubt the ones who jailbreak iOS are thinking about all the cool new apps they'll get to run once they're finished: that's just a bonus. They're thinking that they want to be the one to break apple's security, to make apple scramble to fix it, and then to do it all over again.
I would like a Windows powered tablet personally, and now that there's a way to deliver software outside of the Windows store, I've got a bit more incentive to buy one.
Restate the question: Who would want to buy ARM hardware without knowing whether they would be locked into Windows RT forever. Or could rescue the hardware by loading some other O/S.
This is going to boost the market value of used ARM devices. It may have the perverse effect of selling some more Windows RT, as people don't have the useless brick issue to deal with should they tire of RT.
Have gnu, will travel.
I was not used to that behavior... Things change at Microsoft!
Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
Sydin was referring to the developers of the jailbreak tools, not the users.
Exactly why I bought an SGS 2 so I can put Android 4.1 and Debian 7 on it.
But its not. You're patronizing a hostile vendor.
Then perhaps the right answer is, instead of giving money to a company that is hostile to you, that you should look around for a vendor who provides what you want. Android's done a good job at crippling that market however.
No. iOS 6 proves that this argument is and always has been shit. Apple doesn't give a flying fuck about jailbreakers and will fight them until they've got nothing and thus far Apple is winning.
You'll eventually jump ship.
Yes, which is why I mentioned TurboVNC which has been doing the same sort of thing for a couple of years. I think I know how RemoteFX works, what I don't know is how it performs.
Similar things of course even back in 1999 with that p90 and a 64CPU beast at the other end of a 10Mb/s pipe, I'd say exactly the same thing now with TurboVNC exporting a Windows7 screen running Rev-IT or blender or whatever.
Of course where RemoteFX and TurboVNC fail is they are just streaming bitmaps and they can't get the sort of acceleration you could get by sending less bits to do the same job in the form of OpenGL objects - like you could do back in 1999 and earlier with X. So while you may get something prettier than your local hardware could render in real time the frame rate is going to suck without a really fat pipe (so forget about wireless tablets doing it well) and you need at least some grunt in the graphics hardware to keep on refreshing those bitmaps so you may as well be rendering it locally anyway from 3D information on the server (eg. use OpenGL).
I can't see RemoteFX or TurboVNC as a viable option for something with a lot of 3D graphics and requiring decent frame rates. With your Rev-IT example I'm assuming it's a different story if it's like other solid modelling packages and there's not a lot of change to refresh (compared to a 3D game with lots of movement, textures etc) so any of the three options is going to look OK.