Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Apple and Mozilla Block Vulnerable Java Plug-ins

Posted by Soulskill on from the no-dogs-allowed dept.

hypnosec writes "Following news that a Java 0-day has been rolled into exploit kits, without any patch to fix the vulnerability, Mozilla and Apple have blocked the latest versions of Java on Firefox and Mac OS X respectively. Mozilla has taken steps to protect its user base from the yet-unpatched vulnerability. Mozilla has added to its Firefox add-on block-list: Java 7 Update 10, Java 7 Update 9, Java 6 Update 38 and Java 6 Update 37. Similar steps have also been taken by Apple; it has updated its anti-malware system to only allow version 1.7.10.19 or higher, thereby automatically blocking the vulnerable version, 1.7.10.18." Here are some ways to disable Java, if you're not sure how.

6 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. and to unblock? by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... and if I need to unblock it, because I need to support shit that runs in these versions?

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  2. Oracle Trashing Java? by Art+Challenor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sun was either more dedicated or just better at maintaing Java. There were problems, of course, under Sun, but the anti-Java sentiment based on vulnerabilities seems to be mostly post-Oracle (and somewhat justified).

  3. Hypocritical by phizi0n · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While Java applets are very rare and not of much use to me personally (I mostly see it used for irc clients and bad web games), it seems a bit of an overstep to disable it completely for everyone due to a 0-day vulnerability. How is anyone supposed to ever use it if web browsers start disabling it for every 0-day vulnerability that pops up. It's not like Firefox and Safari don't also have 0-day vulnerabilities but you don't see them completely shutting themselves down nor do they roll out fixes the same day, so it seems a bit hypocritical. IMO there should be a small grace period of 1-2 weeks where the browser warns people of the known unpatched vulnerability but allows users to choose to load it anyways if they trust the site (yes, most people will just say yes to get past it) to at least give the plugin authors a chance to fix it before it gets completely disabled.

    1. Re:Hypocritical by VGPowerlord · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I really wish I could disable it at work, but we both have an (externally developed) Java applet in our main product and use WebEx to audio-conference and screen-share with the contractors who produce said Java applet.

      At home, I occasionally do Java development, but I just install the 64-bit JDK, which doesn't include the plugin for 32-bit web browsers like Chrome and Firefox. Problem solved there!

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  4. Why this zero-day? Why Java? by guanxi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are many zero-day exploits out there for many applications (and operating systems, etc.). Why does this one deserve special treatment?

    It's the second time that I remember Mozilla doing it with Java.

  5. Mozilla: Why break stuff instead of fixing it? by OMG · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is no one recommending to raise the security level for Java applets from "medium" to "high" or "very high"?

    Since Update 10 there is this new control that could be employed exactly right now:
    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/client-security.html