Slashdot Mirror


Manipulating Heat Like Light

An anonymous reader writes "A new technique allows allows 'thermocrystals' to be created that can manipulate heat (a vibration of the atomic lattice of a material). Predicted manipulations include the ability to selectively transmit, reflect or concentrate heat much like light waves can be manipulated by lenses and mirrors. 'Heat differs from sound, he explains, in the frequency of its vibrations: Sound waves consist of lower frequencies (up to the kilohertz range, or thousands of vibrations per second), while heat arises from higher frequencies (in the terahertz range, or trillions of vibrations per second).' Applications range from better thermoelectric devices to switchable heat insulating/transmitting materials (abstract). Perhaps this will result in better cooling/heating mechanisms or more efficient engines."

47 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Could they redirect only a certain hotness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maxwell's Demon?

    1. Re:Could they redirect only a certain hotness? by radtea · · Score: 4, Informative

      No.

      They first have to select specific wavelengths and then--it sounds like--frequency-shift them.

      To call this "heat" is a deliberately misleading statement designed to elicit precisely the question you are asking, as that will attract much more of our most limited resource--attention--to this otherwise interesting but essentially esoteric work.

      "Heat" in ordinary parlance is constituted by vibrational modes that obey the principle of equipartition, which this "heat" manifestly does not.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    2. Re:Could they redirect only a certain hotness? by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      Terahertz technology is an interesting research topic, but it is not about heat.

    3. Re:Could they redirect only a certain hotness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So essentially it's now ok to overload semantics in scientific writings ?!
      I just invented* a safe** and practical*** form of cold-fusion****.

      * stole
      ** for non sentient life forms outside of solar system
      *** for the purpose of filling my bank account
      **** relative to the sun, not so much to the atmosphere...

      This is precisely why C++ sucks Afro-Caucasian***** balls.

      ***** chocolate milk ice cream.

    4. Re:Could they redirect only a certain hotness? by guises · · Score: 1

      So... if I select out a certain wavelength of light then it isn't proper to call it light anymore? Come on, if you're using common parlance then "heat" really just means "thermal energy" anyway. This may be a little esoteric, but I could see this developing into a lot of potential applications.

      I'll grant that this isn't breaking news for most people, but as science reporting goes this is pretty good. It's better than another fad diet or fish oil bullshit story.

    5. Re:Could they redirect only a certain hotness? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      And the energy they refer as light is just the energy "in flight" in "the field" - there's also the energy in the Motion of the matter which is hot (ie, sound). This last can have many different ways of expression beyond just "frequency". These different ways are different degrees of freedom, and once heat energy density is high enough, it always finds a way to create more. For example, adding more atoms to a molecule increases the number of unique modes with which it can shake about... so heat capacity (energy per temperature change) generally depends on molecular complexity. The material with the lowest heat capacity is also the simplest.

      Ummm... what? Heat capacity per what? If it's "per mass" - no, it isn't (hydrogen - 14.30 J/g/K, helium- 5.1932, paraffin wax - C25H52 - 2.5 J/g/k). If it is "per mol" - then it's true that more complex molecules will store more thermal energy in the "vibrational degrees of freedom".

      This work is fairly ground-breaking because it shows manipulation heat energy in a way we've not known before. Thermal diodes imply possibly more efficient ways of "switching" the flow of heat - and this means more efficient heat pumps / heat exchangers.

      The relevant word (missing from your statement above) is "some" - as in "some heat energy" or "the flow of some heat". And is relevant because there's a bit of way until the second law of thermodynamics is "repealed" (the one that says "Entropy will always increase"): if "all the heat flow" could be controlled, we wouldn't be far from a second type of perpetual motion machine.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  2. Re:Does "heat" really require definition ? by AdamStarks · · Score: 3, Insightful
  3. Low-heat electricity generation by brentonboy · · Score: 2

    I wonder if you could use this to concentrate low levels of heat and generate electricity from it. Not only would you be able to get energy out of (almost) nothing, (albeit, probably not much), but you could cool an area without producing a lot of waste heat.

    1. Re:Low-heat electricity generation by jonbryce · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, because it would violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

    2. Re:Low-heat electricity generation by brentonboy · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, because it would violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

      Does the 2nd law of thermodynamics not apply to a steam generator?

    3. Re:Low-heat electricity generation by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      Concentrating heat and then using it to do work violates the second law of thermodynamics.

      If you can concentrate heat, it must be in a setup that would makes a thermal machine not work.

    4. Re:Low-heat electricity generation by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Yes, in that a steam generator is able to capture energy from the transfer of heat from a hot area to cold area and uses it to do work.

    5. Re:Low-heat electricity generation by jonbryce · · Score: 2

      You can concentrate heat and use it to run a thermal machine. However it will require more work to concentrate the heat than you will get out of the thermal machine.

    6. Re:Low-heat electricity generation by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      You can imagine a setup with a black body radiator and a theoretical lense and attempt to focus the black body radiation to heat another object to a higher temperature than the original black body. And it is not possible. The laws of thermodynamics apply of course but they don't explain the why. If you go through the motions and try to calculate how hot you can get the second object you find you can't get it hot enough. You can't focus the radiation to make it hotter.

    7. Re:Low-heat electricity generation by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      We are at about 90% efficiency for them, so not really.

  4. Re:Does "heat" really require definition ? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Uneducated as I must be, I at first assumed they were talking about infra-red radiation, and so I was duly enlightened.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  5. Fusion! A/C, Sterling by snadrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How did this one get missed? Fusion's biggest problem is heat management.
    Thermal Diodes: Hook this to a solar collecting sterling engine for a considerable performance boost.
    That sounds like passive Heating & Air conditioning. Maybe society will use technology to reduce its power consumption overall.

    --
    Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    1. Re:Fusion! A/C, Sterling by wontie · · Score: 1

      This. This is huge! Well, ... assuming it can be made to work, and at a larger scale, the possibilities to improve energy efficiency are intriguing. Of course, the military might have an interest here too: could it be used to cloak heat signatures? It sounds like a meta material to me.

    2. Re:Fusion! A/C, Sterling by Decker-Mage · · Score: 1

      A thermal cloaking effect was our first thought here. It's a cast iron bitch to try and hide a tank even with the thermal cloaking blankets today. I'd have to read (and think) so more before I can determine naval applications. [Naval background here.]

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    3. Re:Fusion! A/C, Sterling by Migraineman · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure plasma confinement can be achieved by routing secondary power through the ventral relays (so say the historical documents.)

    4. Re:Fusion! A/C, Sterling by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Or even spaceships, heat dissipation can be a major issue with long term presences in space.

    5. Re:Fusion! A/C, Sterling by Guignol · · Score: 1

      A sterling engine is a mechanism that allow British scientists to claim that thanks to this new discovery fusion is now almost just a matter of plumbing and a few more engineering details, thereby getting more funding for their research as well as the New Super Mario Bros U.

    6. Re:Fusion! A/C, Sterling by dywolf · · Score: 1

      my first thought was a "heat laser". the perfect solution to heat dissipation in space....turn it into a weapon!

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  6. Re:Does "heat" really require definition ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So thinks he's a rocket scientist, explain how space with no atomic lattice can radiate heat at a temperature of 2.7K?

  7. Not really "heat" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is just EM radiation that at our temperature and materials just happens to turn into heat easily.

  8. A specific specially created heat by sandytaru · · Score: 4, Informative

    These crystals aren't heat sinks. The MIT lab is creating a "heat" that is actually just really fast sound. This can then be manipulated with their special thermocrystals. Now, if they can create a way to turn normal waste heat into this "fast sound" heat, we'll open up a wealth of practical applications.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:A specific specially created heat by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Yes, Just imagine it! Ultrasonic Welding of Plastics!

    2. Re:A specific specially created heat by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      I presume we are then talking about phonon manipulation. Which is pretty cool (sorry for that pun) but at the moment I can't see a lot of applications. Should be able to do lots of interesting photon like things but much slower. Useful if you want to embed logic in a solid material.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
  9. Heat diodes by icebike · · Score: 2

    From TFA:

    The crystals could also be used to create thermal diodes: materials in which heat can pass in one direction, but not in the reverse direction. Such a one-way heat flow could be useful in energy-efficient buildings in hot and cold climates.

    Other variations of the material could be used to focus heat — much like focusing light with a lens — to concentrate it in a small area. Another intriguing possibility is thermal cloaking,

    Some of the speculative uses seem pretty interesting. To date it is only 40% efficient at some of these tasks, but that's not bad for starters.

    These things sound like beginnings of heat circuitry components. The method involves making alloys of silicon that incorporate nanoparticles of germanium in a particular size range, and layering these thin films. If they can find a dynamically controllable switch structure you could build most of the necessary components for simple circuits.

    Then you run into this sentences from TFA:

    Heat also spans a wide range of frequencies, he says, while sound spans a single frequency.

    Wow. Journalism student I'm guessing?

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  10. Wha? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    Sound is pressure waves. Heat, or more accurately, infrared, is electromagnetic radiation.

    They are so vastly different, far beyond just frequency, that I'm not sure what the person who wrote the summary is smoking. :)

    1. Re:Wha? by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      You need to take your thermodynamic classes again.

      Heat and infrared radiation are two very different things.

    2. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      A swing and a miss... While things with temperature will emit blackbody radiation, which corresponds with IR for temperatures humans typically deal with in day to day stuff, and it is possible for a photon gas to have a temperature and distribution, neither of those make heat synonymous with IR or light in general. E&M radiation covers transfer by irradiation, but convection and conduction are handled by vibrations and motion of particles.

    3. Re:Wha? by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed. Heat has more in common with sound than it does with light. (Not that they're the same.)

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  11. Microchips! by briancox2 · · Score: 1

    One of the major problems with creating extremely powerful fan-less processors for mobile devices is heat. Heat problems increase to a square of scale variations when miniaturizing circuitry. If control of heat can be directed to increase the flow of heat away from NEMS and microchips adequately, we could see mobile devices that could compete with the most powerful current desktop processor.

    --
    We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
  12. Re:A bit late by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    Napolean already gave Fourier the patent on that.

    But this version is transformative! And Faster!

  13. Re:Cure for radiation? by BluPhenix316 · · Score: 1

    I am wondering about this myself

  14. I failed High School Physics Day by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    On Slashdot!

  15. Re:Keep Wondering. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Blackbody radiation isn't from exciting electrons and seeing them decay back to ground-state. That would make blackbody radiation far from smooth and continuous. Instead it is due to the acceleration of charged particles which causes them to emit electromagnetic radiation, which works even with plasma or a soup of pure electrons. It also allows blackbody radiation to go to energies much higher or much lower than what you can find atomic transitions for.

    That said, IR can be a component of heat, as can any part of the spectrum depending on the temperatures dealing with, as heat is the energy transferred between bodies. In some cases that is done by irradiation, other times it is done by conduction which would be driven by vibration and motion of atoms. Internal energy of most thermal systems, on the other hand, is pretty much all vibration or motion though.

  16. parent is wrong. period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Parent is wrong.

  17. Thermodynamics by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    It's only a "law" because we do not yet know how to break it.

    I, for one, look forward to the day (year, century...) when we decide that it's an obsolete principle. Until we actually know all the rules of the game, all the interactions, all the api of the universe... we cannot know that anything is truly a "law of physics". We can speculate, postulate, investigate, narrow-in-on, or disprove, but never really affirm.

    (Which is not to say that this specific mechanism shows any promise, just that some mechanism might exist in the future.)

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  18. Heat and Light by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    Face Palm!

    Heat is vibrating atoms. (Or slightly more accurately, banging off each other randomly like billiard balls.) Some of that energy gets converted and emitted as radiation, and radiation can be absorbed and converted to heat, but that does NOT make them the same thing.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  19. Re:Does "heat" really require definition ? by skids · · Score: 2

    That's what I read into the distinction as well. Of course, they could have just said "thermal phonons".

  20. So I didn't read the article... by FSWKU · · Score: 1

    ...but is this a step towards a working Thermal Discouragement Beam?

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  21. Re:Keep Wondering. by skids · · Score: 1

    Technically, neither are phonons "heat". Heat is energy in transit, and semantically is not strictly equivalent to any of the mechanisms or consequences of that transfer. However outside of a scientific treatment, this stricture is dropped.

    OP is of course incorrect in assume that IR is the only mechanism by which heat can occur.

  22. misleading blurb or bad paper? by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    Usually the main problem with press release science is that it has nothing to do with the real science behind it. Probably, there's an MIT professor embarrassed to show up to colloquia right now.

    This press release is talking about acoustic metamaterials. The scientific description in the press release is bad, very bad, but one thing they got dead wrong is that this is not new.

  23. Re:Does "heat" really require definition ? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

    It is ambiguous, though I can't see why a process for controlling female animal breeding behaviour should be "news for nerds".

  24. A long time issue by HHealthy · · Score: 1

    Very interesting. Dont you think It always sounded weird when you were in class and the teacher claimed Energy is partially converted partially lost as heat. Certanly these thermocrystals should be kept an eye on. For funding, research and peer finding please refer to the non-profit Aging Portfolio.