Slashdot Mirror


NASA Releases Orbital Photos of Beijing's Air Pollution

skade88 writes "This story should remind us all that air pollution controls are not just about addressing global warming. They also help us have cleaner air and fewer health problems resulting from smog and haze. Starting earlier this month, Beijing, China started having worse than normal air pollution issues. On January 14, 2013 the U.S. embassy's air pollution sensors in Beijing found the density of the most dangerous small air particles, PM 2.5, at 291 micrograms per cubic meter of air. The World Health Organization's guidelines for air pollution state that PM 2.5 above 25 micrograms per cubic meter of air is dangerous to a person's health. To put the problem into perspective, NASA has released two orbital photos of Beijing showing before-and-during images of the air pollution. The photo from January 4 shows parts of Beijing still visible from space. The photo from January 14 shows nothing but a huge, thick cloud of haze with no buildings visible."

5 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The US is no better by magarity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Smog in some US cities was bad way back in the '70's but nowhere near what it's like in Beijing this month. When you call US environmental conditions "woeful" attached to an article about the pollution going on in China, it really lets your ignorance shine. The US environment isn't perfect, but yes, it is vastly superior.

  2. Good news in disguise by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    China has been dragging its feet on global warming reforms. China has been emphatically objecting to any cut in its produce of green house gases (and other pollutants).

    Now that Beijing (and surrounding cities in China) are being blanketed by the thick polluted and toxic fog, the Chinese leadership may be forced to alter their strategy and move away from pollution-generating industries.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  3. Re:that's what the job killing lines get you stuff by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Landfill is a management issue, not a volume issue.

    We could dig a hole a mile to a side, put all are garbage into it and it would be half full in about 700 years at our current rate of growth.

    frankly I would have separate holes, for different material so we will have easy access when we figure out how to effectively recycle them.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  4. Re:The US is no better by hondo77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The EPA has actually made huge strides in the U.S. To the point that big cities which used to have smog constantly and you could see the air are now clear.

    So, naturally, Republicans want to end the EPA. Can't let the hippies win!

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  5. Re:that's what the job killing lines get you stuff by ihatewinXP · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Relatively speaking?

    Have you been outside the 5th ring road? Ive seen factories the likes id never seen in my life. Sprawls of smokestacks just chugging away. Not to mention the fact that DAMN NEAR EVERY RESTAURANT AND MANY HOMES STILL USE COAL.

    During the Olympics in 08 they had all the factories shut down for a month prior and seeded the clouds for a week to wash the city and air. Worked wonderfully.

    Cars are a problem - and a growing one to say the least - but dont be too quick to discount the manufacturing and a city of 16 million still using coal.

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.