Scrabble Needs a New Scoring System

innocent_white_lamb writes "A researcher says that some letters are over valued and some are under-valued in Scrabble, due to recent changes to the lists of allowable words. Z and X are now much easier to play and should be worth less, while U, M and G should be worth more than they are now. Joshua Lewis wrote a program to re-calculate the value of each letter to better reflect the current usage. The co-president of the North American Scrabble Players Association says that he often hears criticism of Scrabble's scoring system, but any change would bring about 'catastrophic outrage'. A spokesman for Mattel says that they have no plans to change the game."

Comments

Why not just version the Rules?

[Anonymous Coward]

Why not just version the Rules? Original, 2012, etc? MTG has new decks come out, new rules come out,old cards removed new added... they did fine (relatively).

The language changes... so should the rules.

Mattel?

[mark-t]

Scrabble is Hasbro IP.

Hasbro and Mattel are two *ENTIRELY* separate companies. Rivals, in fact.

Saying that Mattel has no plans to change the game is like saying that Microsoft has no plans to change the iPhone.

It doesn't matter

[Anonymous Coward]

It is a game, the iportant thing is that everyone is playing by the same rules. Sure, if you were to develop scrabble today, it might be nice to adjust the values of the letters to reduce the element of chance in the game, but now there is insufficient reason to go and change it. It woudl still have been ok if every letter had the same value.

Re:It doesn't matter

[Kjella]

But would you really want to reduce the element of chance? People like to play poker because although you will lose to a poker pro over time, you can sit down with the world's best poker player and win some hands, while with chess you'll lose to Magnus Carlsen 100 out of 100 times. Making it a pure skills-based game is only fun for the one with the best skill, assuming fun should have anything to do with games.

Flattening the scoring

[Anonymous Coward]

This was brought up during an NPR interview the earlier this week and I agreed with the mentioned counterpoint. While it makes logical sense for a rework of the scoring system, it's effectively flattening it and removing some of the strategy around the unpredictability of the game.

Regardless, Mattel has already gone on record (I believe) stating it will keep the scoring as is.

See these letters as 'bonus' and 'penalty'

[G3ckoG33k]

Many games have these, 'bonus' and 'penalty', and Scrabble appears to be one of them.

It is part of the game and Mattel has no reason to change their rules.

It's a game

[Overzeetop]

If you don't like it, go get yourself some wood putty and a sharpie and make the letters whatever value you damned well please.