Boeing 787 Dreamliner Grounded In US and EU
Some Bitch writes "Following previous stories that the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration was to review the safety of the Boeing 787 and that Japan had already grounded their fleet, the FAA has issued an airworthiness directive which has been endorsed around the world with the fleets of all eight airlines flying the 787 now grounded. EADS (the parent company of Airbus) shares were up 3.9% at close of business." General Electric's call for more sifting of more data from more sensors might have some resonance right now within Boeing.
Not really. Having a plane go down and THEN having a grounding is as bad as it gets.
Having a plane with a structural failure is far worse than having a subsystem failure like this. Like the time back in 2005 when an Airbus 310 rudder came off over the Caribbean.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2005/mar/13/theairlineindustry.internationalnews
Or the cracks in the wings of the Airbus 380:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-16452878
Or engines blowing off the Airbus 380 in 2010.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Latest-News-Wires/2010/1104/Airbus-A380-fleet-grounded-after-Qantas-jet-engine-blowout
Or a cockpit electrical failure on the Airbus A320 during take-off.
http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_21378229/airbus-a320s-cockpit-problems-continue-since-faa-order
There are many things that are much worse than a battery fire.
So all in all, yes it looks bad, but in actuality the box did its job!
But the contents of the box is no longer performing it's function... minor as it might be, one presumes that it's not there just for the hell of it. And that's not including the minor inconvience of spewing smoke and scaring the paying customers.