Slashdot Mirror


Google Now Boasts World's No. 2 and No. 3 Social Networks

redletterdave writes "A new report released Monday revealed that Google+, less than a year and a half after its public debut, is now the No. 2 social network in the world with 343 million active users. Even better for Google, YouTube, which had not previously been tracked as a social network until recently, is now the No. 3 social network in the world with about 300 million active users. Google Plus and YouTube are being used by 25 percent and 21 percent of the global Internet populace, respectively."

6 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. Not much competition by s.petry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not to belittle what Google has done and purchased, but what other options were and are there? Google was supposed to be more secure than 1 other social network company. It is, though many distrust Google as much as they distrust Facebook when it comes to releasing information to Governments. Youtube was acquired, and for "Movies" and "Videos" was already a healthy and stable company. If it was launched as a social media site, I doubt it would have the depth it does. An alternative would have popped up in my opinion.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  2. hydrox by aahpandasrun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is like saying that Hydrox is the #2 chocolate and cream cookie next to Oreo. It still sucks, and nobody likes it.

  3. And if you weight it by value... by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... then Google+ might be the only relevant social networking site. Facebook, twitter, etc, are still mostly plugged up with people taking pictures of their (coffee / cat / car) or telling you which bathroom they are using this afternoon. Google+ actually has meaningful discussions.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:And if you weight it by value... by vlm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google+ actually has meaningful discussions.

      FB/twitter for pics of dinner and smiling kids and babbling complaining and TV and sports discussion, G+ for hobbies.
      G+ has HUGE and active ham radio, and photography communities.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  4. Re:Where's /. on that list? by Maxx169 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not sure /. is that far behind Digg anymore.

  5. Re:YouTube users now Google+ users by Omestes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    None of my real life friends have actually moved to Google+ from Facebook, but oddly, the community on Google+ is better. Less lively, but also less crap (went to the store today... here is a baby picture... here is a 3 year old meme... here is some religion fluff... here is a horoscope... I like poker.).

    Google+ sucks as a network of friends, but its pretty nice for communities. Both the tech/nerd communities, and the photography communities are thriving. Google+ is the new Flickr, and they actively work on it, sponsoring all sorts of events and hangouts, and actively courting popular online personalities. Its paid off. The tech, geek, and science communities are also pretty healthy.

    On Facebook I would never follow/like/whatnot someone who isn't a personal friend. One Google I only follow people who are interesting, even if they are complete strangers. They are pretty much two completely different things.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey