Slashdot Mirror
Twitter's New Transparency Report: Governments Still Want Your Data
Nerval's Lobster writes "All your Tweets are belong to us... with a court order. Twitter's second transparency report reinforces what many already know: governments want online user data, and to yank select content from the Internet. Twitter's first two transparency reports cover the entirety of 2012, so there's not a deep historical record to mine for insight. Nonetheless, that year's worth of data shows all types of government inquiry—information requests, removal requests, and copyright notices—either on the increase or holding relatively steady. Governments requested user information from Twitter some 1,009 times in the second half of 2012, up slightly from 849 requests in the first half of that year. Content-removal requests spiked from 6 in the first half of 2012 to 42 in the second. Meanwhile, copyright notices declined a bit, from 3378 in the first half of 2012 to 3268 in the second."
I farted. teehee. #bigwetfarts
Quite easy. It links to something that is copyright infringing.
You know it's coming. Hit post then immediately a popup appears informing you of your eRrest warrant and eNdictment prompting you for your plea.
How can a tweet infringe copyright? I find it inconceivable that 140 characters could ever do that.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
13,256,278,887,989,457,651,018,865,901,401,704,640
"Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
This is the internet so common sense or even real world examples do not apply. If the real world laws were written like laws regarding data/internet you would get 35 years for drug trafficking because you told a friend an address of a house that sells drugs.
Publishing a crypto key isn't an infringment of copyright.
The key is not a creative work. It's ineligible for copyright.
Yep, that violates anti-circumvention clauses of the DMCA not copyrights.
Youv'e never written poetry, I guess. You can cram a lot into 140 characters.
But there is no 140 character limit. There is a 140 character per tweet limit. Two tweets is 280 characters. Now we are really talking.
The government (which is usually read "law enforcement" or "the court system") has *always* wanted your data - and via search warrant and/or subpoenas has *always* been able to either get it from third parties or to compel you to hand it over yourself. With increasing amounts of our lives involving the 'net, it should be about as surprising (and panic worthy) as the sun rising in the morning that the government is taking an interest in data located on the 'net.
As I said in reference to Google's transparency report the other day, the only surprising/interesting thing here is that the number is so small.
"Worldwide, 81 percent of all requests for user data originated in the United States, Twitter said."
Police state much?
The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
How can a tweet infringe copyright? I find it inconceivable that 140 characters could ever do that.
I just tweeted the following: "How can a tweet infringe copyright? I find it inconceivable that 140 characters could ever do that."
Hah! I infringed your copyright. Sue me!
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
....faced with.
I have found that my tweets have been censored. Any tweet I make with a link do not make it into any hash thread included in the tweet.
It wasn't always like this as there was a time I could and I see people doing it today, so why are my tweets being censored?
Here is an example and the nature of my tweet that triggered off this censorship. Oddly enough even the White House petition site (where teh death star petition got near 35,000 signers) provides an option to share the petition link with both facebook and twitter, but its like a Neo and Agent Smith first meeting, what good is such an option if I cannot be seen?
I have wiped my twitter account because of the for what is teh point of being spied on if I cannot defend against?
The example link and nature of my tweets being censored is > http://wh.gov/EYbi #IRS #taxes #taxpayers
That Shortened link is provided by the White House petition site so for the long link https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/provide-each-taxpayer-independent-voice-where-taxes-they-pay-are-be-allocated-and-used-all-tax/cxBlXQht?utm_source=wh.gov&utm_medium=shorturl&utm_campaign=shorturl
So as I said, twitter has more than just government spying issues.
Google has been revealing (via their own transparency reports) that governments want your searches, email, and whatnot that are stored on their servers. Twitter is telling people that the governments are doing the same. I don't think it'll really hit home until Facebook follows suit. Only then will people really "get it" that the government is mining the details of your online life to do whatever they want with it.
I said this before on here: Big Brother was made "cool" and the public welcomed it with open arms. In this case, FB, Twitter, and anything else on the internet along with your cellphones and now your televisions.
Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
You contradicted yourself.
Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.