Slashdot Mirror


WTO Approves Suspension of US Copyright in Antigua

hydrofix writes "On Thursday TorrentFreak broke the story (verified by BBC) that the government of Antigua and Barbuda, a tiny island nation on the Caribbean, was planning to launch a legal 'pirate' website selling movies, music and software without paying a penny to U.S. copyright holders. Now, the World Trade Organization has given its final approval for the Antigua government to launch the website. The decision follows from long-running trade dispute between the countries, related to online gambling, which was ruled in Antigua's favor in 2005. After the United States refused to compensate, the WTO granted Antigua the right to 'suspend' U.S. copyrights for up to $21 million annually." From the article: "The Antiguan government further reiterated today that the term 'piracy' doesn’t apply in this situation, as they are fully authorized to suspend U.S. copyrights. It is a legal remedy that was approved by all WTO members, including the United States."

9 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. Karma is a.... by Sprouticus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is what happens when you try to strong arm countries and, then, when the ruling goes against you, you ignore it.

    B&A is going to make $21 million really fast. The question is who sets the prices....

  2. Domain seizures ahead? by BSAtHome · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets see if they use a domain registrar that has US roots/ties and then the DHS will seize the domain name of the site(s).

  3. Re:WTO is Full of.... by Splab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it's absolutely how it should be.

    The U.S wont respect the agreements, then Antigua doesn't have to either. Just like any other trade sanction being used around the world - you go for where it hurts to make the big guy play ball.

  4. Re:How does this affect copyleft? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ruling doesn't suspend everyone's obligations with regard to the copyrights involved, just Antigua's - while the copy sent to you may be unencmbered by a license, that doesn't mean you gain any rights to redistribution.

  5. Re:WTO is Full of.... by Sique · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We should negotiate trade agreements individually on a nation by nation basis (there is only about 400 after all our government is already BIG enough to read everyone e-mail so that should not be an issue).

    You know what then will happen? All the other nations will form a common body for the sake of negotiations with the U.S., and the U.S. will be forced to sign the same treaty with everyone. You get the WTO again, but without the leverage of being a member.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  6. Re:WTO is Full of.... by dkf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope the outcome is that our government does a re-think on being part of the WTO in the first place

    Careful for what you wish for; the outcomes might not be what you expect. For example, it would also mean that the rest of the world would feel no need at all to enforce copyrights held under US law, including on a lot of Free Software, or at least not until the negotiation of a whole new set of bipartite treaties.

    I wonder whether it would be legal now (if not necessarily moral) for an Antiguan citizen to do derivative works of software where the copyright holder is the FSF and change the license to a different one (e.g., a BSD variant)...

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  7. Re:WTO is Full of.... by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's how it always works. Restricting it to the same business won't work because usually there isn't a significant "same business".

    You put a tariff on importing their televisions, so they put a tariff on importing your wheat.

    The WTO was supposed to put a stop to that, but of course the only real enforcement mechanism it has is that very thing. "Hey the rules say you can't do that. Since you won't stop we'll let the other guy do this other thing that is also supposed to be against the rules".

  8. Bully tactic blowback sucks by hduff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think its also a cautionary tale about these world governing bodies and making treaties. Our earliest founders warned us about getting into international entanglements. This is clear example of how these things don't always come out as planned. We might be strong arming China one week, but might have some rulings like these go against our interests another, and it makes us look like real ass hats when we try and argue these international bodies should be abide by one moment and than ignore them the next.

    Yeah, it sucks when you must follow rules you agreed to, especially hwne you intended to use thoe rules to strong-arm others.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  9. Re:They Cannot Get Something of any Value? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They had an opportunity to ask for something valuable and instead asked for all the crap put out by Hollywood?

    It is actually quite smart. Their goal is to apply pressure on American politicians to abide by trade rules. Hollywood is very politically connected. The studios are big political donors, and they already have lots of lobbyists on K Street. If Hollywood squeals, Washington listens.