$616.57 Three Strikes Verdict Cost RIANZ $250,000
Dangerous_Minds writes "On Wednesday, we discussed news that RIANZ convicted its first file-sharer under the New Zealand three strikes law. While the fine totaled $616.57, a New Zealand Herald report points out that in order to get that fine, RIANZ had to spend $250,000. Freezenet makes an interesting point that HADOPI (France's version of the three strikes law) faced similar problems when the Socialist party commented that 12 million euros was a lot of money to pay 60 agents to send out 1 million e-mails. The question raised is whether or not this money pit trend will continue when the Copyright Alert System starts processing strike notices in the United States."
Citizens see the cost situation like this:
Cost to pursue and prosecute these cases -(is greater than)- The return in fines + the benefit to society.
Politicians see it like this:
Donations to my campaign from the media industries + Future support from my party -(is greater than)- Any backlash from voters about the cost
What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
then later:
that's $150k right there, plus $100k to employ people to hunt/send stuff and lawyers is hardly unreasonable .. how the hell is this "insightful" when it's contradicted by the summary