Transparent Transistors Printed On Paper

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Transparent Transistors Printed On Paper

Posted by Unknown on Monday February 4, 2013 @10:07PM from the next-step-dispoable-eink dept.

MTorrice writes "To make light-weight, inexpensive electronics using renewable materials, scientists have turned to a technology that is almost 2,000 years old: paper. Researchers fabricated organic transistors on a transparent, exceptionally smooth type of paper called nanopaper. This material has cellulose fibers that are only 10 nm in diameter. The nanopaper transistors are about 84% transparent, and their performance decreases only slightly when bent."

12 of 51 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Is it Green or is it Transparent? by Required+Snark · 2013-02-04 22:30 · Score: 4, Funny

The nanopaper transistor also showed excellent optical transmittance up to 83.5%. The device configuration can be applied to many other semiconductor materials toward flexible green electronics.
This is confusing. Is it green or is it transparent? Maybe it's a light green. Just make up your mind.

--
Why is Snark Required?
1. Re:Is it Green or is it Transparent? by c0lo · 2013-02-04 23:50 · Score: 2
  
  The nanopaper transistor also showed excellent optical transmittance up to 83.5%. The device configuration can be applied to many other semiconductor materials toward flexible green electronics.
  This is confusing. Is it green or is it transparent? Maybe it's a light green. Just make up your mind.
  From TFA:
  
  Only a 10% decrease in mobility was observed when the nanopaper transistors were being bent.
  Well, one fact is certain: the paper transistor is very much like a crocodile, as it is more flexible than it is green (it's 90% flexible and at most 16.5% green).
  
  --
  Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
Re:2000 year old tech by Nyder · 2013-02-04 22:37 · Score: 2

Moron. I'm pretty sure your only interest is in rolling paper.
If it keeps joints from "canoeing" I'm all for this transparent transistors rolling paper technology.

--
Be seeing you...
2000 year old? by dabadab · 2013-02-04 22:39 · Score: 4, Insightful

That is certainly a lot more modern, than silicone, which is about 14 billion years old.
Could we skip this bullshit? This nanopaper most certainly don't have too much in common with the paper made 2000 years ago.

--
Real life is overrated.
1. Re:2000 year old? by SuricouRaven · 2013-02-05 00:18 · Score: 3, Insightful
  
  Silicon. Not silicone. Silicone is a polymer compound of silicon and oxygen, commonly used as a sealant.
2. Re:2000 year old? by azalin · 2013-02-05 00:58 · Score: 2
  
  Papyrus is not paper. Paper making requires putting short fibers pulped in water, spreading the pulp, pressing and drying it. Papyrus on the other hand is created by weaving Papyrus grass.
3. Re:2000 year old? by ArcadeMan · 2013-02-05 03:13 · Score: 2
  
  Silicone: ( . )( . ) implants
  Silicon: computer chips to render 3D virtual ( . )( . )
  FTFY
  
  --
  Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
TFA by codeButcher · 2013-02-04 23:51 · Score: 4, Interesting

I've read the fine article, and it might not be immediately clear from the summary that the breakthrough here is not the transistor per se - the important step was in using the "nanopaper" (which is tech that is in fact NOT 2KA old).
And while the nanopaper may be biodegradable, I am wondering about the carbon nanotubes they are printing on top (as conductors). While the toxicity of carbon nanotubes is still being studied, there are good indications that they might behave similar to asbestos fibres. So not something you would necessarily want to throw on your compost heap.

--
Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
Re:2000 year old tech by codeButcher · 2013-02-04 23:57 · Score: 3, Insightful

Apparently (from TFA) the purpose for printing on a transparent substrate has to do with creating light-emitting display technology (from cheap, renewable resources, with a low recycling impact). So, probably much less transistor-dense than your great balls of fire GPU.

--
Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
How it's done... by unixisc · 2013-02-05 00:05 · Score: 2

>|
They'll need different Unicode characters to go from TTL to CMOS. Using those, they can build FPGAs.
Grant writing time! by Overzeetop · 2013-02-05 00:14 · Score: 4, Funny

Yes. Thank you for all coming today. I have here, in my hand, a new type of transistor that I have printed on this ORDINARY piece of paper. ...
What?
Of course you cant see them - they're transparent. ...
Do they work? Of course they do, and Jimmy here has a nice computer simulation of the process. ...
No, of course we can't demonstrate on the real thing, we still have to work out the interconnects and external interface, but trust me - they're on here. ...
Yes, I have printed what is essentially invisible transistors on this paper, and it will change the world. I just need a few million dollars in funding to help me work out some of the critical issues.

--
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
Re:What happens if you overclock them . . . ? by azalin · 2013-02-05 00:59 · Score: 2

. . . do you end up with a raging fire . . . ?
I think Boing is using batteries for that