Slashdot Mirror


Deloitte: Use a Longer Password In 2013. Seriously.

clustro writes "Deloitte predicts that 8-character passwords will become insecure in 2013. Humans have trouble remembering passwords with more than seven characters, and it is difficult to enter long, complex passwords into mobile devices. Users have not adapted to increased computing power available to crackers, and continue to use bad practices such as using common and short passwords, and re-using passwords across multiple websites. A recent study showed that using the 10000 most common passwords would have cracked >98% of 6 million user accounts. All of these problems have the potential for a huge security hazard. Password vaults are likely to become more widely used out of necessity. Multifactor authentication strategies, such as phone texts, iris scans, and dongles are also likely to become more widespread, especially by banks."

5 of 538 comments (clear)

  1. Until artificial limits are removed... by eksith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used my online banking today and they limit to 8 characters EXACTLY... even though they demand a non alpha-numeric character and mixed case. I keep thinking, these idiots still don't get it. Also, obligatory.

    --
    If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
  2. Git Rid of Asinine Password Requirements First by Secret+Agent+Man · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • Minimum lengths? Sounds good.
    • Require a non-alphanumeric symbol? Sounds good.
    • Must have at least one lowercase letter, capital letter, punctuation, number? Uh...
    • Max length of 12 characters. Wat?

    Some password requirements are perfectly acceptable, even encouraged. There exist plenty, however, that just make one scratch one's head. Why would a maximum length any lower than several hundred characters ever be necessary? More egregious limitations include requiring an insanely complex number of symbol/letter/number combinations (easy for AI, hard for humans, as XKCD eloquently points out) and, of course, passwords restricted to numbers only. Sadly financial institutions seem to be fond of this one, possibly under the mentality that a PIN is just as good as a password, and customers won't forget that!

  3. Re:I Got It! by LoRdTAW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A better question would be, what system would allow 1000 password guesses per second to be authenticated? Most systems lock you out after 3 to 5 unsuccessful attempts. And I would hope that smart developers would put a time delay between how fast a user can reattempt to authenticate. So a computer sending authentication attempts in less than one second would be immediately blacklisted as a automated attack. Inserting a second or two delay between attempts would guarantee that. Assuming a computer could brute force a password by trying all possible strings, what system could that possibly be effective against? I can see that it could be useful against an encrypted file but an online banking site or other eCommerce site sounds impractical. anyone care to elaborate?

  4. Re:I Got It! by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your definition of "common words" is off by about an order of magnitude from reality, though. A typical person only uses about 10,000–25,000 words on a regular basis, depending on their level of education.

    Even assuming the upper end of that, nearly all people would typically choose from about 3 * 10^17 possibilities, which at 350 billion attempts per second, would take only around ten days to crack. On the lower end, a sizable percentage of people would choose from about 1 * 10^16, which would take about eight hours to crack.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  5. Re:I Got It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Password too long, please enter 8-12 characters.