Slashdot Mirror


Printable AR-15 Mag Gets More Reliable; YouTube Pulls Video of Demo

Wired reports that the 3-D printed AR-15 magazine from Defense Distributed we mentioned a few weeks back has been improved through design, and is now robust enough to last through firing (at least) several hundred rounds, rather than fewer than a hundred as in the previous iteration. CNET says the video demonstration on YouTube was first yanked, then restored, but as of now seems to have been yanked again.

15 of 450 comments (clear)

  1. Yanked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The message says it violates Youtubes police against "spams, scams and commercially deceptive" videos..

    How, exactly? Is google jumping into this dumbshit political dickwaving contest now?

    1. Re:Yanked? by scottbomb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They've been in the political dickwaving contest for a long time now. Guess who's side they're on?

  2. Intellectually Dishonest by tokencode · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Youtube (AKA Google) is being intellectually dishonest and going back on its ideal of providing unbiased free access to information. Google has become an active filterer of this information. The video is not graphic, it is not sexual, it is relevant and political and Google has decided that is not appropriate for viewers.... Thank you Big Brother Google for protecting me from information. Maybe we should start filtering books, or speech?

  3. Re:Good one Youtube by Sipper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Streisand effect for the win.

    Basically that's where this is headed. "The more you tighten your grip, the more this is going to slip through your fingers." We're basically headed down the path of building our own weapons from scratch, just like what has happened in warzones elsewhere.

  4. Re:Baby killers by kcmastrpc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One man, one rifle.
    Twenty men, twenty rifles.
    Fifty men, fifty rifles.
    One hundred men, one hundred rifles.

    One man has no chance of taking a tank, twenty guys might though. They won't be taking anything though without arms. Same goes for commandeering the drone control facility. You don't seem to understand that the second amendment isn't about one mans ability to rise up against tyranny, it's about the militias. But if you take one mans weapons, you take the militias. Your arguments are tired, pathetic, and lack any depth to what the forefathers envisioned.

  5. Re:offtopic... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gun ownership shouldn't be a right but a privilege, just as some people shouldn't have kids until they're mature enough to be able to take care of oneself before taking care of another living thing. That's what annoys me about the 2nd amendment...it guarantees the individual to own a gun, even if such individual is a complete moron and doesn't even know the rest of the Bill of Rights.

    One of the (many) problems with your proposal is...who gets to define the rules as to who is allowed to exercise this 'privilege'. Remember...any power you give to an administration you like, you also grant to the next administration which you may not like.

  6. Re:Easy. The government. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Name an administrator's policy which has directly or indirectly caused harm to you or your family, and where a gun has defused the situation?

    I can not name a traffic accident that I was in where a seat-belt saved my life. I still buckle up when I go for a drive.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  7. What the tyrants need to understand... by Baldrson · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Its not the guns that threaten you, dear tyrant.

    Its the fact that you have disenfranchised the people who support you.

    Ultimately, it will be trivial for them to cut the supply lines to cities and there will be f***all you can do about it.

    So, just keep it up...

  8. Re:Good one Youtube by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is a fun fact for you. I can 3d Print an AR-15 Lower receiver right now. Print it in wax, add the sprues and dip it in the silica to make the lost wax casting form. Cast it and with very light machining I have a unregistered AR15 lower. This process is EASY for someone that has a clue. if you have access to a multi axis CNC machine I can print out lowers from blocks of aluminum all day long.

    Yet the Govt does not make it illegal for me to have a forge or a CNC machine. Stop fearmongering.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  9. Re:Good one Youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to mention that putting all the NRA members in one place wouldn't change anything, unless you were going to nuke it from orbit. If you think they'd have some massive shootout with each other, you are buying into a bizarre paranoid delusion portrayed by the media. More likely, they'd all stand up and say "we're tired of this crap" and march on DC to throw out all the Marxist a-holes.

  10. Re:NOT ROCKET SCIENCE by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ammo is not hard to get.

    Ammo is in short supply only for the highly uneducated idiots. The rest of us that actually know something about guns have plenty of ammo, a lifetime supply of ammo.

    I have at least 20,000 primers on hand (cheaper to buy a full case) and about 9000 bullets that are FMJ.
    Last time I went to the range, I came home with another 5000 spent brass that I tumble to clean up and start reloading. 5.56 reloaded rounds cost me $0.12 each. 7.62 cost me about $0.15 each and take almost no time to reload properly. In fact my reloads are way more accurate than anything you can buy in the store.

    A friend is a machinist and has made a casting block to make his own 5.56 bullets out of lead. we are going to try shooting his home made bullets in reloaded rounds this spring.

    IF they ban the bullets, those of us that chose to learn will not run out of ammo.
    The funny part is, most of the people making the run on guns and ammo are liberals that dont agree with who they elected.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. Re:Good one Youtube by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Met a lot more paranoids at Berkley and Occupy events then I ever did at the shooting ranges.

    Self described "Peaceful" and "Tolerant" people are the most intolerant I know.

    Round us up. Kill us if we resist.

    Yeah. Tolerant and peaceful.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  12. The stupid side. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact is, most people don't know how easy it is to make guns. They imagine that it requires loads of highly-specialized and expensive equipment, plus a lot of training in some esoteric art, in order to produce guns.

    They further imagine that this makes production costs high, which serve as a natural limit to how many guns are in circulation.

    Of course, this is pure rubbish. None of this is even remotely true. Utter nonsense.

    But that doesn't stop most people from seeing this whole gun-printing fiasco as a means of upsetting that (completely mythical) economic balance. They think this makes it a lot easier to make guns, and therefore more people will make and have guns than ever before (in HUGE numbers). Further, since having guns makes people turn evil, everyone we love (including ourselves) will be put at MUCH GREATER RISK of being shot than EVER BEFORE!!!

    Again, this is pure and utter nonsense. But it is what the majority of the people seem to believe, and fear. Fear produces irrational responses, which are driving youtube to yank a video.

    It sucks that we must share the world with stupid and irrational people, but there isn't much we can do about it. They outnumber us, and they always will.

  13. Re:Good one Youtube by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm completely serious.

    When is the last time Congress held hearings about limiting your right to own whatever car you want? When is the last time the President of the US went on a tour to promote his plan to curtail what car accessories you can own or buy?

    There's no need for you to stand up and decry the ridiculousness of an onslaught of bullshit legislation. Gun enthusiasts don't have that option. There are people who've been trying for longer than either of us has been alive to strip the American people of the ability to own entire classes of firearms or even all classes of firearms. We take a stand, we make noise because we have no other choice.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  14. Re:Good one Youtube by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When the first cars came out people cared a great deal, and wanted flagmen to walk ahead of every car...you really don't know the history of this.

    Yeah yeah and buggy whip makers were upset that they were going to soon be out of work... That has nothing to do with the world of today.

    Not about trying to cut down on gun crime, that's a ridiculous cover.

    More people were killed with hammers last year than with the kinds of guns they want to prohibit.

    Most gun violence is committed with handguns, but they know there is no political will to enact a handgun ban. Semiautomatic rifles are an easy target because the average person doesn't have a very good understanding of the difference between a military weapon and a civilian firearms that looks similar to one.

    If you're a chess player, you learn to think about the moves to come. That's what we're doing.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano