Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Corn Shortage Hampers US Ethanol Production

Posted by timothy on from the but-think-of-the-poor-candlemakers dept.

drdread66 writes "A nationwide corn shortage brought on by last year's drought has started to curtail ethanol production. While this shouldn't be surprising to anyone, it raises public policy issues regarding ethanol usage requirements in motor fuel. Given that the energy efficiency of ethanol fuel is questionable at best, is it time to lift the mandate for ethanol in our gasoline?"

5 of 419 comments (clear)

  1. Yes. by Richy_T · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Short answer: Yes.

    Long answer: No, it is, in fact, way past time.

    Next question?

  2. Kill Corn Subsidies! by Bananatree3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kill the corn subsidies, period. They prop up the house of cards that hold the corth ethanol and HFCS industries that would otherwise not exist because they can't survive in a real capital market.

    The sooner these tax-payer-subsidized industries get the rug pulled from under them, the sooner things like cellulosic ethanol and other *real* technological innovations can come to fruition.

    1. Re:Kill Corn Subsidies! by Bananatree3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      reduced to using real sugar

      My point exactly. Make the industry stand on its own two legs goddammit. The US Government has enough money leaks already. Sure HFCS prices will rise without subsidies, but that's capitalism for you. Once industries are faced with the *real* price of corn, sugar and ethanol alternatives will be sought out and maximized. A cheap or cheaper alternative will be found, that's innovation.

      Corn subsidies breed stagnation, not innovation.

    2. Re:Kill Corn Subsidies! by Bananatree3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Corn subsidies don't promote really food security, they prop up a food additive industry, fuel industry and the ranching industry. If subsidies were targeted at *only* corn that was meant for direct human consumption (not animal feed, HFCS, etc)....then maybe it might be possible to label it as a "food security" program. But when the majority of corn acreage is dedicated for animal feed or HFCS, or ethanol production, its much more than just a simple "food security" program...

  3. Not if you want to win votes in the farming states by Xenkar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Corn ethanol is and probably always will be a handout to the farming states. It takes more oil to grow the corn for ethanol than we save from blending ethanol into our engines.

    The rest of us are screwed over by this. It would be better for the economy and the environment to just calculate out how much profit the farmers are getting and just hand out yearly checks for that amount. But that would be socialism and we can't have any of that.