Slashdot Mirror


How To Sneak Into the Super Bowl With Social Engineering

danielkennedy74 links to an instructive story captured on video introduced with these words: "Sneaking in near press/employee access points without going thru them, zigzagging through corridors, and once carrying a box so someone opens a door for them, two jokers from Savannah State University social engineer their way into Super Bowl XLVII for the most part simply by looking like they belong." USA Today has a slightly longer article.

164 comments

  1. Gitmo by stormpunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they can use their social engineering to get out of Gitmo after this video gets labeled by people with no sense of humor as terrorist training material.

    1. Re:Gitmo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you so afraid you can not read such stories without immediately thinking about "gitmo", black helicopters or something? Don't be a coward, you will be dead in 100 years no matter what you do. Let go, don't worry and start doing stuff you want to do before your time is up.

    2. Re:Gitmo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      YOLO!

    3. Re:Gitmo by Kagato · · Score: 1

      Gitmo, nah. But they did document their trespassing. They have a scene where they are shown lying to a cop which might be a bigger crime than the trespassing.

    4. Re:Gitmo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, I do indeed like owls. How'd you guess?

    5. Re:Gitmo by dosilegecko · · Score: 2

      Lying to a cop is not illegal unless it is a few well defined circumstances.

    6. Re:Gitmo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a scene where they are shown lying to a cop...

      I've heard them saying "we are making a documentary". What is incorrect about that?

      As for trespassing, what is the difference in them doing this and someone else? For example,

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvH3YQGQwLM

      or this,

              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McB9tsabPn0

  2. hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So if I've got this right: you can lie and otherwise deceive people in order to access computer systems. So that makes it geeky , which means its also geeky to lie or otherwise deceive people in other contexts. Is that about it?

    1. Re:hmmmm by ireallyhateslashdot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Social engineering is social engineering. Penetrating a security system is penetrating a security system.

    2. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Social engineering is social engineering.

      "Social engineering" is lying or otherwise deceiving people. As euphemisms go, it's a pretty pathetic one.

    3. Re:hmmmm by echucker · · Score: 1

      Social engineering is social engineering. Penetrating a security system is penetrating a security system.

      Except security systems rarely exist without a human component.

    4. Re:hmmmm by White+Flame · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Social engineering" is getting people to do exactly what you want them to do, that they normally wouldn't do, without them realizing that anything's amiss. But yeah, while that inevitably necessitates deception, I wouldn't say it's defined as deception.

    5. Re:hmmmm by hawkinspeter · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily. Sometimes social engineering takes advantage of people's assumptions. If you wear a printer servicing uniform and people assume that you're there to fix a printer, are you lying or deceiving them? I'd posit that their assumptions are incorrect and you're not deceiving them unless you're challenged and you start lying.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    6. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I couldn't help myself.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2efhrCxI4J0

      Why didn't we ever make ourselves obnoxious UI's like this?

    7. Re:hmmmm by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not necessarily. Sometimes social engineering takes advantage of people's assumptions. If you wear a printer servicing uniform and people assume that you're there to fix a printer, are you lying or deceiving them? I'd posit that their assumptions are incorrect and you're not deceiving them unless you're challenged and you start lying.

      Bullshit, of course you're deceiving them. You cannot expect normal human beings to question all their assumptions 24/7. Every time you blinked you'd have to prove to yourself that the whole universe hadn't just been switched off and then instantaneously recreated itself.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you wear a printer servicing uniform and people assume that you're there to fix a printer, are you lying or deceiving them?

      If you wear a printer servicing uniform with the intention of leading people to draw incorrect conclusions from that then of course you're deceiving them. Are you seriously saying that you thought otherwise?

    9. Re:hmmmm by hawkinspeter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should however expect normal humans to question assumptions when it comes to letting random people through security doors. Would you be happy if a bank got robbed and the bank staff turned round with "he was wearing a plumber's outfit, so we just assumed he was looking at the plumbing although we were a bit puzzled as to what plumbing was in the vault".

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    10. Re:hmmmm by hawkinspeter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may have the intent of letting people deceive themselves, but I consider that different to actively deceiving/lying to people.

      Here's a car analogy - a car advert might specify "does not contain carcinogenic seat material" with the intent that people will question other makes that don't have that disclaimer. Now, they are not actually deceiving people as they are making a true claim and advertising standards would have no problem with it.

      If I go for a job interview wearing clothes that I normally wouldn't wear (suit, tie etc), am I deceiving the interviewers that I usually dress like that?

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    11. Re:hmmmm by dav1dc · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily. Sometimes social engineering takes advantage of people's assumptions. If you wear a printer servicing uniform and people assume that you're there to fix a printer, are you lying or deceiving them? I'd posit that their assumptions are incorrect and you're not deceiving them unless you're challenged and you start lying.

      Bullshit, of course you're deceiving them. You cannot expect normal human beings to question all their assumptions 24/7. Every time you blinked you'd have to prove to yourself that the whole universe hadn't just been switched off and then instantaneously recreated itself.

      True story, I once walked into an Apple store wearing a blue shirt.
      As luck would have it - it looked pretty damn close to the blue shirts that all the "Geniuses" were wearing that day.
      Once inside the store, I was bombarded by a constant stream of people asking me technical questions - which it just so happens that I'm good at answering! ^_^

      I didn't deliberately choose to wear a blue shirt that day - it was just the luck of the draw.
      Did I deceive anyone in this case??

      Social engineering can take on many forms.

    12. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wear a printer servicing uniform and people assume that you're there to fix a printer, are you lying or deceiving them?

      If you wear a printer servicing uniform *with the intention of leading people to draw incorrect conclusions from that* then of course you're deceiving them. Are you seriously saying that you thought otherwise?

      I dunno, what if we set parsemode=XOR

      The guy masquerading as a printer tech is *deceiving them*, but he's not *lying* to anybody :)

    13. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're deceiving yourself then if you don't think you're actively deceiving people when you actively choose to wear a particular uniform with the intent to deceive.

      If you wore the uniform out of habit or accidentally and somehow wandered in to somewhere where you shouldn't be in, then people were still deceived but you didn't intend to deceive them, nor did you intend to bypass "access controls" by using that uniform. So a reasonable court should rule you innocent.

      Otherwise you're guilty of deceiving people.

    14. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If it was on a day and around the same time a plumber was scheduled to show up to fix a clogged toilet when an extremely important client was in the office; no I wouldn't be happy, but I wouldn't blame the guy. I'd blame management for not having a system in place to avoid situations where the bank staff is forced to ask "do I risk pissing off our biggest client by having him use a shit-smelling, toilet clogged bathroom or do I hand wave this plumber-looking guy through?"

    15. Re:hmmmm by chrismcb · · Score: 2

      Bullshit, of course you're deceiving them. You cannot expect normal human beings to question all their assumptions 24/7.

      In some circumstances you ARE supposed to question them. And that is the whole point. Its one thing when the secretary assumes the printer guy is the printer guy, its another when its the guard at the front door.

    16. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. But it would be stupid to say that the thief hadn't deceived them. It's the fact that they let themselves be deceievd so easily that's a particular reason for outrage. But that doesn't make it non-deception.

    17. Re:hmmmm by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      To my mind, you're not responsible for other people's opinions/beliefs etc. If someone chooses to assume something and you decide not to correct them, then that's their problem. The whole advertising industry is built on the fact that you can legally mislead someone by playing on their assumptions.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    18. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You may have the intent of letting people deceive themselves, but I consider that different to actively deceiving/lying to people.

      You are actively deceiving them. Deception does not strictly mean "telling a bald-faced lie." It means "giving a false impression." If you, with intent, as you say, caused people to form a false impression, then you deceived them.

      If I walk around in public in a police officer's uniform, I can be charged with impersonating a police officer, regardless of whether I ever actually told anyone I was a cop. Even if my uniform was a different shade of blue than the cops in the local jurisdiction. Even if my badge was plastic and had a disclaimer that said "Not a cop" on it if you looked at it closely.

      Here's a car analogy - a car advert might specify "does not contain carcinogenic seat material" with the intent that people will question other makes that don't have that disclaimer. Now, they are not actually deceiving people as they are making a true claim and advertising standards would have no problem with it.

      At least in the US, that's wrong. That's called "implied falsity," and a competitor would almost certainly sue over such a claim.

    19. Re:hmmmm by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Of course you are deceiving them. The entire point is to make them think something is true, which isnt; thats basically the definition of deception.

      Its like lying by omission. If your mother were to ask "did you eat the cookies" and you answer "no" since you only ate a singular cookie, you have lied / practiced deception. Technically your words were true but they were specifically phrased to make her believe something false.

    20. Re:hmmmm by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      " Every time you blinked you'd have to prove to yourself that the whole universe hadn't just been switched off and then instantaneously recreated itself."

      I thought the universal sign of universe reset was Deja Vu.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    21. Re:hmmmm by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      "Intent" plays a big part in whether you can be considered to be deceiving someone.

    22. Re:hmmmm by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Can you explain to me why you think using actions to lead people to believe incorrect things is different than using words to do so?

      Deception is deception, whether through actions or appearance or words. The goal is to lead someone to believe something untrue, and how it is done doesnt change that it is deception.

    23. Re:hmmmm by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If I wear a plumber's overalls and someone challenges me as to why I'm there, then if I lie to them, that's actively deceiving them. If I tell the truth and say that I'm checking to see who bothers to challenge unknown visitors, then I'm not actively deceiving them. If I don't get challenged, then it's arguably a grey area, but I'd consider it a passive deception if anything.

      Regarding the car analogy; I can't believe that a competitor could possibly win such a court case. Hair products routinely include "miraculous" ingredients that sound scientific and are presented by actors in white coats, but are effectively useless.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    24. Re:hmmmm by hawkinspeter · · Score: 2

      The untruth is in the person's incorrect assumption that someone wearing a particular uniform must necessarily be performing that function (or that someone who is in a particular area is supposed to be in that area). Without the observer, there is no deception, it's just someone wearing a particular set of clothing.

      I don't believe that I'm responsible for other people's beliefs. If other people choose to believe something, then that is their concern. If I wear a Superman outfit, I don't feel that it's my responsibility to inform everyone that I'm not in fact the actual Superman - people are responsible for their own beliefs/misconceptions/thoughts etc.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    25. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I only wink.

    26. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if he actually *is* a printer tech, just not the one they were expecting? Where's the deception then?

    27. Re:hmmmm by cyberfunkr · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Sometimes social engineering takes advantage of people's assumptions. If you wear a printer servicing uniform and people assume that you're there to fix a printer, are you lying or deceiving them? I'd posit that their assumptions are incorrect and you're not deceiving them unless you're challenged and you start lying.

      Bullshit, of course you're deceiving them. You cannot expect normal human beings to question all their assumptions 24/7. Every time you blinked you'd have to prove to yourself that the whole universe hadn't just been switched off and then instantaneously recreated itself.

      True story, I once walked into an Apple store wearing a blue shirt.
      As luck would have it - it looked pretty damn close to the blue shirts that all the "Geniuses" were wearing that day.
      Once inside the store, I was bombarded by a constant stream of people asking me technical questions - which it just so happens that I'm good at answering! ^_^

      I didn't deliberately choose to wear a blue shirt that day - it was just the luck of the draw.
      Did I deceive anyone in this case??

      Social engineering can take on many forms.

      Yes, yes you are deceiving people.

      Someone comes in and says, "I need help with this." They are assuming that you are an Apple employee, and since you did not correct them, and you KNEW, or at least had a pretty reasonable certainty that they considered you an employee, you are deceiving them.

      Now imagine the advice you gave backfired. The customer comes back and says, "Your genius said I should do this, and now my device is bricked. I demand a new one!" After someone back and forth they discover that you were not an employee, but your attire and your attitude convinced them you were. And since the customer did something that bricked the device, and it was not under the advice of a true Apple employee, the warranty is void. Or at the very least, Apple is off the hook and can choose whether or not to fix the problem.

      It would have been simple to say, "Yes, I can try helping you with the problem. But just for the record, I am not an Apple Genius," for the sake of clarity and remove any possibility of deception.

    28. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. If I wear a plumber's overalls and someone challenges me as to why I'm there, then if I lie to them, that's actively deceiving them. If I tell the truth and say that I'm checking to see who bothers to challenge unknown visitors, then I'm not actively deceiving them. If I don't get challenged, then it's arguably a grey area, but I'd consider it a passive deception if anything.

      . If you just generally wear plumbers' overalls as you go about your daily business, sure. But if you deliberately put on plumbers' overalls in the knowledge that it would cause people to assume that you were a plumber, then it's a deliberate act of deception. Your intent is the key.

      Hell, it's in the dictionary:

      to mislead by a false appearance or statement; delude: They deceived the enemy by disguising the destroyer as a freighter.

  3. no matter what by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Justice works slowly, but finally it will get one.

  4. "by holding a box" by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many hundreds of millions did Homeland spend to "secure" the super bowl again? Of all the things they've been accused of, fewest of the charges have been competence. When a couple college kids carrying a box can sneak past every security check point, without either them or their box being inspected, it becomes painfully obvious that the security provided is just a show... not unlike the one they're "protecting".

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:"by holding a box" by Pubstar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This whole thing reminds me of the oldest trick in the book to get into night clubs: Have an extension cord/Power strip/DMX cable over your shoulder and just book it past the bouncer saying they need it on the stage NOW or the DJ is going to flip out. Works 99% of the time without you being so much as questioned.

    2. Re:"by holding a box" by guttentag · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, carrying a box that looks burdensome implies you are doing work, so people assume you belong there. I once walked into the courtyard of a large "fruit company" by helping a vendor carry in a box. He assumed I worked there, and they assumed I was with him. I even got a name tag at the door.

    3. Re:"by holding a box" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      security is always for show, hackers know this very well.

    4. Re:"by holding a box" by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      security is always for show, hackers know this very well.

      Indeed, that is why Al Qaeda have been able to "hack" their way through US military security and arm themselves with a few H-bombs.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:"by holding a box" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does "fruit company" stand for? Never came across that euphemism.

    6. Re:"by holding a box" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He means Apple

    7. Re:"by holding a box" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah Apple, and it's in the movie Forrest Gump that Forrest describes his Apple shares as a fuitin' business

    8. Re:"by holding a box" by houghi · · Score: 1

      Well, no matter how much money they got. This clearly means it wasn't enough and they should get more.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:"by holding a box" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, it's a very convincing act. But it is still a show.

      1995, Guy steals tank from military base, goes on rampage

      And, that wasn't even the last time that happened in the U.S.

    10. Re:"by holding a box" by youfail · · Score: 1

      Agree with you, works every time. Sometimes I have to explain what i'm doing, but usually nobody bothers me going in fast with a bundle of cables. I admit, usually I am working at the venue but the bouncers don't know that. At one point I worked for a company that did most of the night club A/V installations and maintenance in the region. Usually it was enough to mention the company name, and they would let you in to sections of the restaurant that weren't open at that hour, alone. And when you walked out with insanely expensive equipment, you just had to tell them it was for regular maintenance. No questions asked. And no, the staff didn't know me.

      --
      People who have a clean conscience are happy. People who don't have a conscience are the happiest motherfuckers alive.
    11. Re:"by holding a box" by youfail · · Score: 0

      The whole setting needs just one technician hauling a wheeled case full of explosives to the arena, And yeah, tell me the DHS or any other agencies know enough about moving lights and pyrotechnics to be able to tell the difference betweeen a dangerous explosive vs part of the show equipment.

      --
      People who have a clean conscience are happy. People who don't have a conscience are the happiest motherfuckers alive.
  5. congrats! by sdnoob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You just ensured DHS VIPR teams will harass, molest and radiate every person that gets within a block of every Superbowl venue from here on.

    1. Re:congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta educate the masses somehow.

    2. Re:congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find it funny how You somehow make it their fault and not DHS'

    3. Re:congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Authority is always right.

    4. Re:congrats! by girlintraining · · Score: 2

      You just ensured DHS VIPR teams will harass, molest and radiate every person that gets within a block of every Superbowl venue from here on.

      Yup. Because all it takes is a couple of teenagers pulling a prank for our government to whip out the disintegrator rays and their flying armchairs and start zapping people while screaming "We're saving you motherf--ers! ZAP! SAFE! ZAP! SAFE!"

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that. If I get stopped by them and they identify themselves, I will tell them they are not police officers, drive away, and call the real police. Then I will take it as far as possible in court on the 4th amendment, hopefully reaching SCOTUS and putting an end to the insanity.

    6. Re:congrats! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      You just ensured DHS VIPR teams will harass, molest and radiate every person that gets within a block of every Superbowl venue from here on.

      Fantastic! The only way the war diginity gets cancelled is if enough people are made to suffer the indiginities of it.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:congrats! by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Screw that. If I get stopped by them and they identify themselves, I will tell them they are not police officers, drive away, and call the real police. Then I will take it as far as possible in court on the 4th amendment, hopefully reaching SCOTUS and putting an end to the insanity.

      No, you won't. There's a slight difference between talking tough as an AC on an internet forum and actually doing something about it in real life.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:congrats! by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Wait, its DHS's fault that they did something that they havent done yet?

      Gotta love slashdot logic.

    9. Re:congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - the point, in flight

      o - your head

      To clarify the statement: I find it funny, that You somehow believe the molestation done by DHS to be the fault of some guys getting to the superbowl with the use of social engineering, and not the constant terrorist paranoia propagated by the DHS and their agents striving to enlarge their sphere of influence and justify their tremendous funding.

    10. Re:congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, its DHS's fault that they did something that they havent done yet?

      Will do, then. Happy now, Mr Pedant?

    11. Re:congrats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like the precogs are up and running, already detecting precrime!

  6. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This assumes you WANT to goto the superbowl...

    I'd pay money not to hear about it ever again. Billions wasted every year on grown men playing 'ball'.

    Superbowl: A giant toilet we flush cash down every year for no gain.

    1. Re:But... by JustOK · · Score: 0

      It's technically called hand-egg

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:But... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2

      Superbowl: A giant toilet we flush cash down every year for no gain.

      Thus the name I've used for quite a while to describe it when asked "are you gonna watch the super-bowl?".. I reply "oh you mean the toilet-bowl"

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    3. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better response. Assume "super" is simply an adjective, and they are referring to the quite super Puppy Bowl.

      "Why yes I will be watching that super awesome Puppy Bowl. As if there is any other bowl that could possibly be referred to as 'super'".

  7. congrats! - This isn't news by DKlineburg · · Score: 0

    Social engineering is used all the time. This is like saying people are sheeple. some form of social engineering is used in a lot of ploys.

    Social Hacking

    Smishing is social engineering.

    I guess I fail to see how this is new. I understand some of the best old school hacks; call the company and talk to the receptionist. If your good you can get information about employees, or other things to start on.

    --
    Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4

      I guess I fail to see how this is new.

      Because the story isn't that people use social engineering. It's that these particular people used social engineering to sneak into the Superbowl, a high-profile, suppoedly high-security event, which just happened. Hence, "news."

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I guess I fail to see how this is new

      Who said it was new? What is great about it is that the superbowl was classified as a "Level I National Security Event" - the very tippy-top of Homeland Security's classification system. These are the events they spend beaucoup (but not published) dollars on "securing" from oogy-boogy terrorists.

      So, despite all this focus on security and crap, these kids just waltzed on in. Yet more proof of how much of a waste of money DHS's 43 billion dollar budget really is.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      You quoted were I said it wasn't "new". The poster below you at least realized this and responded to that.

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    4. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is interesting. I never heard that. I have to mention a while back I visited a navy installation. I don't know what study they did, but it was something about after 2 hours a "guard" is almost useless. They could see a gorilla stealing a car, and not recognize it due to brain boredom or something. Again, antidoctial, so take it at your value. I couldn't find a study online.

    5. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, antidoctial, so take it at your value.

      I'm guessing you were shooting for anecdotal?

    6. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Alright, Mr Smarty Pants. Was there a major terrorist spectacular at the Super Bowl?

      Exactly, so the security worked.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      How do you know it was security and not that the terrorists screwed up? Maybe they successfully planted a bomb in the stadium but it failed to detonate?

    8. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by war4peace · · Score: 3, Funny

      This reminds me of someone who was planting lots of garlic around his house too keep the vampires away. No vampires around, so his solution worked.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    9. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by logjon · · Score: 0

      Antidotal, actually. He's got a terminal illness and he's looking for hope.

      --
      The stories and info posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
      Only fools would take it as fact.
    10. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Slashdotters who are familiar with real world security it's not news that they sneaked in.

      Maybe its news that they were actually stupid enough to post a video of it. But even that is not big news - most people are stupid.

    11. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the lights did go off.

      Cue the conspiracy nuts

    12. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      Alright, Mr Smarty Pants. Was there a major terrorist spectacular at the Super Bowl?
      Exactly, so the security worked.

      (1) There were no arrests for attempted terrorism at the superbowl
      (2) There were no terrorist attacks anywhere else in the weeks before or after

      So, no, the security didn't "work" - there was nothing to stop. In the absence of a real threat, the security should have stopped anybody like these kids.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    13. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antidotal, actually. He's got a terminal illness and he's looking for hope.

      Terminal brain boredom. Unfortunately, slashdot is probably not helping things much.

    14. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Smishing is social engineering.

      "Smishing" sounds like something I shouldn't be looking up at work...

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    15. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the lights went out at one point... Maybe they're more competent that you thought.

    16. Re:congrats! - This isn't news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well done!!!!
      Exactly.
      DHS are magical, not a single attack at the game.
      I've worked for the govt. briefly, well, I tried to work but they usually wouldn't let me.
      I stood around alot, because working made my boss look bad.
      DHS is just an extension of that BS. But DHS agents lack any sense of humor or moral compass.
      We, the govt., has created a new middle class of power, the DHS agent. It used to be money or fame gave you power, now it is position in the government.
      Jeffrey

  8. Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately the weakest link is always going to be found in the form of huge sacks of protoplasm known as "people".

    This is why, no matter how well trained you get security, social engineering attempts like this will succeed more often than not.

    People are pretty much indoctrinated since birth to try to get along. So if someone looks authoritative, there's a default reaction to simply go with it.

    There's only so many things a person can pay strict attention to at a time. Eventually they're going to reach the limit of things they can keep straight in their heads. And openings in their awareness will occur.

    There's only so long that people can keep up such vigilance before they start relaxing. It's not laziness so much as stimulus saturation.

    I don't care how much money "security" firms and agencies throw at the situation. The only way to avoid it is to not have such events in the first place.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pay one person who knows what he's doing per hour to try to sneak in. Track performance and give bonuses to the people who manage to stop the intruders. The job of security is now suddenly a lot more interesting and challenging. Of course, actual productive work that spans the security area will grind to a halt due to security delays. In the military, newbies get told to guard something and then everyone else is supposed to try to get in. You don't have security if you don't test it.

    2. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      While I agree social engineering more often then not works, it is actually a sign of POOR training or execution of the security staff. This is exactly the type of thing they should be looking for. I work in areas with security where even if you know the name of the guard and drink with him on a Friday night he won't let you in without a security check and a valid pass as he knows that if he doesn't do it and someone sees him not doing the check he will get canned, The fact that they could socially engineer their way in so easily really was basic security failure.

    3. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      In which military, and in what years, did this happen? I find it hard to believe that this is/was common practice in any branch of the US Armed Forces.

      Marines guard most of the Navy's gates, facilities, etc, and it makes a marine's day to throw a sailor on the ground, stick the muzzle of a rifle in his ear, and shout "DON'T MOVE MOTHERFUCKER!!" In fact, a private on Adak Island was promoted to corporal after doing exactly that to a Navy Captain. Marines might be slightly more polite to civilians, depending on the circumstances, but I really doubt that. And, being polite doesn't preclude punching a hole through their chest with his assault rifle. When a marine says "Halt!", just assume that you are very close to death.

      Smaller commands with no marines assigned are just as serious about security. Even though we all recognize each other, we know each other well, NO ONE moves during a security alert. NO ONE goes into a secure area without authorization. Period.

      The Air Force, in my experience, was even more brainwashed than our sailors were.

      The Army? I can't speak for them. I had almost zero contact with them while on active duty.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunately the weakest link is always going to be found in the form of huge sacks of protoplasm known as "people".

      I've heard the TSA called a lot of things, but never "people".

    5. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Track performance and give bonuses to the people who manage to stop the intruders."

      Ensure the bonus even goes to the average schmo hot-dog vendor who challenges somebody who doesn't have their ID showing. It's not a new strategy, but turning it into a game like this shifts cultures. Suddenly all the con-man defenses of "seriously, don't you know me?", "man, you're uptight, chill." or "Bob says it's okay" fall out the window to your "hey, I get $50 if you don't have a badge".

      Not to pick on hot-dog vendors. They're probably more people savvy than most of your security team.

    6. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by m00sh · · Score: 2

      This is why, no matter how well trained you get security, social engineering attempts like this will succeed more often than not.

      As long as the security is better trained than the social engineer, this will not succeed.

      People are pretty much indoctrinated since birth to try to get along. So if someone looks authoritative, there's a default reaction to simply go with it.

      Something that can be easily changed with training.

      There's only so many things a person can pay strict attention to at a time. Eventually they're going to reach the limit of things they can keep straight in their heads. And openings in their awareness will occur.

      The human brain does not work that way. With increasing complexity, the human brain groups patterns of actions into one and there is no shown limit of how much stimulus a human brain can handle in this way.

      There's only so long that people can keep up such vigilance before they start relaxing. It's not laziness so much as stimulus saturation.

      Again, that is not how the human brain and body works. Elite marathon runners can run at 12mph for 2-2.5 hours straight, a speed that most people cannot reach running or even if they do reach it, can only sustain it for a few seconds. With training, people can stay vigilant for hours. The gulf between a trained personnel and an average person is immense.

      I don't care how much money "security" firms and agencies throw at the situation. The only way to avoid it is to not have such events in the first place.

      The solution is to train the security staff, analyze security holes and create training regimens to block those holes. This costs money and as long as the cost of training is more than the cost of social engineers conning their way through for a free show, such social engineering freebies will be tolerated.

    7. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      I will guard everything within the limits of my post and quit my post only when properly relieved. _1st General Order, US Army. Heresay military studies of the time of my introduction to olive drab as a fashion statement were reported to suggest that privates with higher ASVAB scores (military IQ test) made worse sentries that those below a certain level of measured intelligence.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    8. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I don't care how much money "security" firms and agencies throw at the situation. The only way to avoid it is to not have such events in the first place.

      What, just ban any event where two or more people gather together? That'll work out well.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work in a secure government faciliity (not the US), were one day a year the staff were invited to try and break in. This gave security some exercise and the rest of us some fun and/or a day of if you ended up in the cells.

      Of course this was cancelled the moment some one actually managed it.

    10. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by sribe · · Score: 2

      NO ONE goes into a secure area without authorization. Period.

      I did once. As a civilian no less. Stupid gits I worked for sent me out with spare parts and neglected to tell me that the small anonymous-looking complex in the middle of town with an obscure bland name was a military research facility. Guard was asleep, slumped over so far I didn't even see that the uniform was real military as opposed to generic rent-a-cop. I drove on in, thinking I was being nice not waking the guy up.

      Oh boy, from what I heard, hilarity ensued in my wake. Fortunately this happened decades before 9/11/2001, so once concerned guards caught up to me (which happened *very* quickly), it was all smoothed over quickly and politely and I got on with my work--for me that is, I assume "polite" had no relationship to how the guard was treated...

      (That said, I of course only made it into the outer foyer of a building--I doubt that there was any way I would have been able to get to my actual destination inside without signing in, getting a badge, and being escorted.)

    11. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Chas · · Score: 1

      This is why, no matter how well trained you get security, social engineering attempts like this will succeed more often than not.

      As long as the security is better trained than the social engineer, this will not succeed.

      Sorry. But it's not only a matter of training. You can train people all day, every day to eat breathe and live this stuff. And, given the proper environment, it STILL all goes out the window and they default to social indoctrination.

      People are pretty much indoctrinated since birth to try to get along. So if someone looks authoritative, there's a default reaction to simply go with it.

      Something that can be easily changed with training.

      *Easily* huh? I believe your idea of *easy* and mine are two COMPLETELY different things. And, again, it's not merely all about training.

      There's only so many things a person can pay strict attention to at a time. Eventually they're going to reach the limit of things they can keep straight in their heads. And openings in their awareness will occur.

      The human brain does not work that way. With increasing complexity, the human brain groups patterns of actions into one and there is no shown limit of how much stimulus a human brain can handle in this way.

      With increasing complexity, the human brain groups patters of actions into one. Which means they lose to stimulus saturation. Reacting automatically to a certain behavior type is how social engineers are able to bypass this type of security.

      There's only so long that people can keep up such vigilance before they start relaxing. It's not laziness so much as stimulus saturation.

      Again, that is not how the human brain and body works. Elite marathon runners can run at 12mph for 2-2.5 hours straight, a speed that most people cannot reach running or even if they do reach it, can only sustain it for a few seconds. With training, people can stay vigilant for hours. The gulf between a trained personnel and an average person is immense.

      Sorry. But you don't know what you're talking about. This has nothing to do with physical exertion and is, in fact, NOTHING like this. Stimulus saturation, can set in, in certain environments, extremely quickly. Again, it has nothing to do with training.

      I don't care how much money "security" firms and agencies throw at the situation. The only way to avoid it is to not have such events in the first place.

      The solution is to train the security staff, analyze security holes and create training regimens to block those holes. This costs money and as long as the cost of training is more than the cost of social engineers conning their way through for a free show, such social engineering freebies will be tolerated.

      You're wrong. Granted, training will work to LESSEN these types of incidents. But they won't "block" the kinds of gaps these sorts of situations create, and the very notion that the situation is "blockable" in the first place is laughter-inducing.. And anyone who tells you differently is basically bilking you for cash.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    12. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Chas · · Score: 1

      That's not what I meant.

      It's a way of saying that there is no easy or pat, acceptable answer to this.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    13. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Chas · · Score: 1

      Color me unsurprised.

      That's almost the first reaction that happens in cases of a breach.

      In some cases, it's the correct approach.

      In others, it's not.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    14. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      This is a really really good idea. I might actually recommend this where I work. They are super anal about security here... hmmm :)

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    15. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by steelfood · · Score: 1

      You are right. He called them huge sacks of protoplasm, and put "people" in quotes.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    16. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      People are pretty much indoctrinated since birth to try to get along. So if someone looks authoritative, there's a default reaction to simply go with it.

      I think that people (hominids) have been bred for at least the last 2+ million years to try and get along. It is a vital tactic for creatures weak in tooth and claw to band together, and earlier hominids were much smaller and weaker than those that can later.

      The ideas of "truth" and "rules" are very modern, maybe just tens of thousands of years. You may happen to be correct that heading north is 75% likely to find game animals, but if the Alpha says we should go south where you correctly believe success is only 25% likely, shaming the Alpha could easily be a lethal mistake. Not because he will necessarily kill you himself, but because he and his burly allies might throw rocks and you and force you to head north alone.

    17. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by mcsynk · · Score: 1

      Not to pick on hot-dog vendors. They're probably more people savvy than most of your security team.

      Indeed :
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Vz_YTNLn6w (Be sure to watch to 1'40")

    18. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USAF BMTC was fun, really.

      Two shifts of "guard duty" every night, two individuals at a time, at two doors, meaning that a flight of 40 airmen was completed every ten days. Given the number of weeks in training and "test incidents" per shift, everyone got a taste of the pressure.

      I had our BMTI banging on the fight door at 2am, insisting that he be let in or he'll have me beat up and thrown out of the AF, but I had to keep a cool head and do the "left index points at ID card presented, right index points at the person, compare. Left index points at the ID card presented, right index points at the access list board, compare" crap for over 10 minutes, thinking that I was in Deep Shit. ...then he opens the door with his key instead and tells me I did a good job.

    19. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming back fto the sub base after a night out and the back gate of the base was closed. We hopped over the fence. About 10 minutes through our walk through the woods we "met" some marines doing security. They knew we were sailors and they had their few minutes of tactical fun with us before they let us go and lead us in the right direction to get back to our sub.

    20. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Spiridios · · Score: 1

      The Army? I can't speak for them. I had almost zero contact with them while on active duty.

      I can't speak for actual security around the base (I was a bit too paranoid to deviate from my known-safe route), but the gate guards at the Army base where I had a civilian job were just rent-a-cops. That base is now joined with the neighboring Air Force base, but I (along with just about every coworker I had), left long before that happened so I don't know if the rent-a-cops were replaced.

    21. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Jonathan_S · · Score: 1

      "Track performance and give bonuses to the people who manage to stop the intruders."

      Ensure the bonus even goes to the average schmo hot-dog vendor who challenges somebody who doesn't have their ID showing. It's not a new strategy, but turning it into a game like this shifts cultures. Suddenly all the con-man defenses of "seriously, don't you know me?", "man, you're uptight, chill." or "Bob says it's okay" fall out the window to your "hey, I get $50 if you don't have a badge".

      Not to pick on hot-dog vendors. They're probably more people savvy than most of your security team.

      But like implementing bonuses for lines of code written, or number of bugs eliminated, be careful to put in safeguards against people gaming the system.

      If all you do to "intruders" is ask them to leave it probably won't be long before someone gets the bright idea to ask a few friends to drop by and try to slip in. Or even for a coworker or two to "forget" their badge in order to split the reward.

    22. Re:Security is only as good as its weakest link. by Stone2065 · · Score: 1

      When I was in the USAF, (early 80's) we had a single airman on duty for 2 hours at a shot, but it was 24/7 coverage. We also had an airman designated as the "Dorm guard monitor" who did the scheduling. I'm pretty sure the "Latrine Queen" was thought of more highly than the Dorm guard monitor. I know when I was the DGM, I was on EVERYBODY'S shit list. If we had mandatory classes that day, day I had to "borrow" airmen from other flights to fill in, but of course was expected to repay the favor for them. When I got a schedule figured out finally, everyone was pulling their two hours about every 2.5 days or so, and I could stop worrying about a blanket party...

      --
      Stone
  9. This was done 6 years ago by mentil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Zug.com snuck into the super bowl using social engineering as well.
    Details here

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:This was done 6 years ago by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Very nice linked article about the Zug.com prank team. I particularly like that they did it just a few days after the Boston LED Art prank that everyone thought was part of a bomb, and that they were still able to get away with it. They fucking moved two pallets of shrink-wrapped necklace LED lights that weighed a quarter-ton through security and into the stadium. Astounding that anyone can sneak in if they can pass the cardinal 5 rules listed! Lost in this spectacle, it was easy for me to slip past the security station by just pretending I belonged. I make this sound easy, but in fact I was just following the five magic rules for getting into any event in the world: 1. Wear a suit. 2. Wear a Bluetooth headset. 3. Pretend to be talking loudly to someone on the other line. 4. Carry a clipboard. 5. Be white.

      Also another killer quote from the fifth page when they ask the bomb squad to be allowed to borrow a small flatbed truck: http://www.zug.com/pranks/super/index05.html :

      The psychology of cat and mouse is that the mouse will never walk up to the cat and ask if he can borrow a forklift. Mice just don't do that.

      Now of course, they never show the message, and I don't see proof that they plled it off, so is the prank on us? ;>)

    2. Re:This was done 6 years ago by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah like the Chaser APEC prank

    3. Re:This was done 6 years ago by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      5. Be white.

      Did you watch this video? The two guys who got in were black. I know it's fashionable to hate on whitey and grant him magical unfair advantages at *everything*, but these two dudes just proved that black guys can play that game too.

    4. Re:This was done 6 years ago by Dins · · Score: 1

      He was quoting the article on Zug.

      (But I agree with you on general principle)

    5. Re:This was done 6 years ago by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      There's a very real possibility a couple of black men sneaking into certain events, for instance a Superbowl in New Orleans, would stand out even less than a couple of young white men. That said (with regard to the cat and mouse analogy), when you're playing a mouse and there's no real chance the cat will catch and eat you, the pressure and nervousness factor is an order of magnitude less than a real run at espionage.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    6. Re:This was done 6 years ago by Dins · · Score: 1

      Excuse me - she was quoting the article on Zug, apparently...

    7. Re:This was done 6 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, definitely a he (and not one you'd want to meet in person).

    8. Re:This was done 6 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh but when we met you, anonymous coward, you were only partially starting on the path to transgender status... You certainly don't have any balls, so you're 2/3rds of the way there!

  10. The Chaser does it better by Quick+Reply · · Score: 1
    1. Re:The Chaser does it better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This video contains content from Chaser Broadcasting Pty Ltd and The Australian Broadcasting Corporation, one or more of whom have blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.

      I want my old internet back. I still remember... we all had simple access to everything. What a concept it was...

    2. Re:The Chaser does it better by Quick+Reply · · Score: 2

      Wow seriously. Try this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3zKuLgH_l8

    3. Re:The Chaser does it better by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I have your old internet.

      Hola Media Unblocker hola.org/unblocker.html

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:The Chaser does it better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again,
      This video contains content from Chaser Broadcasting Pty Ltd and The Australian Broadcasting Corporation, one or more of whom have blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.

      I've watched already. But this is just sad, it's happening more and more this days.
      And I am on a "free country": Brazil.

  11. Wobble Wobble Wobble... by hairyfish · · Score: 1

    Is it too much to ask for steadycam?

    1. Re:Wobble Wobble Wobble... by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you''re going to sneak into some place inconspicuously, the LEAST you can is bring along a complete camera crew.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:Wobble Wobble Wobble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the complete camera crew, being so completely conspicuous, will often result in *less* attention from the security folks. After all, why would someone bring a camera crew if they aren't supposed to be there in the first place?

    3. Re:Wobble Wobble Wobble... by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      Yeah because a GoPro on your forehead with a flashing red LED looks completely normal....

  12. That was worth another watch. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the fact that some of the party were seriously worried. They had gone way further than they expected and were now fully in sniper range.

    I wish I could see the look on that officers face when he says "... Chaser"!

  13. Some tips on blagging your way in to something by MrDoh! · · Score: 2

    After doing some security work at events, there's some easy tips on what todo/not todo.

    1) have some good lucking women with you. Chances are you'll have a guard somewhere that can be distracted by cleavage.
    2) if there's 2+ of people trying to blag their way in, A) only let 1 person talk B) if you're both talking, have the same script "My boyfriend went to the room to get the tickets and they were gone" from the girl, as the guy's saying "I left the tickets in the car, I think the valet took them" WILL get you turned away.
    3) turn up when there's a line, before the event starts of course, but not too early, if you make a scene, it might be easier to just let you in.
    4) if you get turned away by one guard, ask who you need to see to sort this out, go to them, be nice, wave back at the first person who sent you over, if they wave, say 'he took the ticket and said it was ok'
    5) never say 'do you know who I am', and if you do, don't claim to be the person stood behind the guard. (that cracked me up)
    6) if there's a list with names on, you might be able to peek and claim a name.
    7) "where'd you get this obviously fake ticket?" "there's a guy in the foyer selling them, he said it was legit" "it's not, you need to see that person and get your money back" "but I have a ticket!" "it's fake" "but it's for this event" "yeah, no." is the wrong way. Playing the sob story that this was what you bought online, give as much info as you can. If an event has 5k tickets printed, it's not unknown for the printer/promoter to not only keep some tix behind, but to run dupes. This isn't the punters fault, dropping hints that the promoter/printer is dodgy is all too believable and may help you get in if they think you've done the right thing, not got a cheap tix from a dodgy guy out front.
    for an event that's 'no re-admittance', the old 'I have explosive poop' will get you out, but might not get you back in, still, worth a try.

    I get how social engineering works. Work a door for a few nights, manage an event, you'll hear all sorts of things and very quickly learn what'll never work, what /might/ work.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
    1. Re:Some tips on blagging your way in to something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1) have some good lucking women with you."

      God LICKING women works even better!

    2. Re:Some tips on blagging your way in to something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For events with no re-admittance, I have always had success getting out and back in by claiming I need to go inject myself with insulin in my car. No venue wants you bringing syringes in and they certainly don't want you wandering around in a hyperglycemic haze because you decided to postpone an injection in order to stay at the show. Just mumble something about the ADA if anyone questions you.

    3. Re:Some tips on blagging your way in to something by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      ooo, nice one. I'll remember that for next time.

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
  14. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Somebody here called for an electrician. Can you tell me what the fault is?

    Shit man, it's dark in here!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Ob by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Well done.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  15. Re:Who Belongs... by nukenerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bet this wouldn't work if you looked like a muslim.

    It would in the Middle East.

  16. Accident by Nishi-no-wan · · Score: 1

    I've done this by accident a number of times at both the Asia Series and World Baseball Classic at Tokyo Dome. Thinking back, all I did was have a general admission ticket on a pass carrier around my neck and just walk into the press area while nodding to the guard at the entrance. I was supposed to meet some friends there once, but they got stopped by security. "What? This is a restricted zone?" I had no idea before then that anyone wasn't allowed in there.

    I guess it goes to show that if you really believe you belong somewhere and look the part that few will challenge you.

  17. The best I've seen yet... by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The best I've seen yet was a kid (I'm guessing around 16 yrs old) I watched in action at a concert at the Cow Palace in San Francisco many years ago.

    A friend and I were waiting in line at a Judas Priest concert when I noticed this guy, wearing a light-blue button-up shirt and slacks, using one of them sweeper things--you know, the little broom and a pivot mounted dustpan thing on a long handle that is used to sweep trash into. He was working his way along the line, sweeping up all the crap the people in line were dropping. I watched as he filled the dustpan with trash, walked over to a trashcan near the door, emptied it and went back to work around the entrance--he swept the place clean, then started working his way around the inside of the front door area, even asking one of the security personnel to step aside so he could get to a soda can just behind him. I remember telling myself "What a lame job".

    45 mins later, he was standing next to me about 10 feet from the stage, smoking a joint and obviously enjoying himself. After asking him if he minded passing that thing, I asked him where his broom was. He said with a big, stoned grin on his face that he usually leaves it in the bathroom until after the show. Sure enough, when I went to the bathroom between acts, his sweeper and broom were sitting in the corner.

    1. Re:The best I've seen yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, he 'paid' for his admission with honest labour :^)

    2. Re:The best I've seen yet... by lannocc · · Score: 1

      In this case, dishonest labor.

    3. Re:The best I've seen yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points, you would earn one.

  18. SOCIAL engineering by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    So why is this on Slashdot?

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  19. Re:SOCIAL engineering - Why on Slashdot? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Because of the immense blowback that's about to happen.

    If this was told as a "college beer frat party" story even if it was all the same, we would all have "lol okay back to work". Instead there's *video footage of people and "stuff" (places, unmanned areas, etc.)

    So we have a real problem coming up: Youtube is already ahead of us wondering if this is just a "footage hoax" ... or the big mean Security Theater Beast will be really PISSED and then we'll see more rounds of lockdown.

    Bruce Schneier himself said a ways back that he is shifting focus slightly away from ever more ultra algorithmic breaks to stuff like just calling "Mr./Mrs. X" in some company and getting an insecurely defended password that someone mistakenly gave too many privileges.

    Chris Chase from USA Today expressed a similar note of caution with the *CLEARLY INCOMPLETE* story he'd been handed and wondered what's the next step to (maybe/maybe not) punking the security force of the biggest football game of the year. (Does hit the Libel/Slander rules if it is in fact a hoax but makes them look bad?)

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  20. Public shows by adolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not so hard to get from A to B in any public show: The trick is just to act like you belong there, just like everyone else who also belongs there. Blend in.

    My own favorite was at a show at the Detroit State Theater. We had assigned seats in the balcony, but the sound really was very bad up there. So we left, wandered, and came up to the entrance for the general-admittance floor area.

    There were two security guards looking at tickets before people were allowed into this space, with a small line formed before each of them. We walked right between them as if we owned the venue ourselves, and didn't encounter any trouble. (The sound at front, stage-left was excellent. Kudos to the boardmonkey, and meh to whoever it was that specified the line arrays for that show.)

    And for other intermittently-crowded places, carrying a Motorola 2-way portable radio helps. You can direct traffic and behave authoritatively in almost any capacity, even with long hair, regular clothes, and a beard, as long as you have a radio and the gumption to make it look like you belong there. Do that for a little bit, and nobody around will think twice when you slip in through a side door. And after that, just blend in differently: At that level, people aren't paying much attention to security.

    (And no, it doesn't matter if the radio works or can talk to anyone.)

    So: Social engineering one's way into the Superbowl? Nice feat, but not very surprising.

  21. Re: So is the prank on us? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    This is also a very real possibility, in this crispy new age of "sensational story - haha, it's just a joke, so long and thanks for all the ad clicks."

    My big response is below. I'll end here by just saying that there is something seriously wrong with this story, so I'm not going to sit on pins and needles for 2-4 days for it to pan out as a joke if it is. Because if it's not, we're all busy going "haha cool joke man" when the 100 people pictured in this video are going to lose their jobs.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  22. What, Like John Hargrave? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.zug.com/pranks/super/index01.html
    Well, assuming the "prank" actually happened.

  23. "I'm with the band" by Dan+B. · · Score: 1

    This method has been used by about a gazillion people in so many places, so many times, it just doesn't seem like news. Perhaps the only reason it is "news" is because these guys filmed it? I don't know.

    I've done the same thing plenty of times to get in place I shouldn't be; all it takes is a pair of cohunas and a bit of front to just go right in where you want to, without stopping once to check you are in without being noticed.

    --
    Dan. -- So what if it's spelt wrong, nobody's perfect
  24. Re:Who Belongs... by flyneye · · Score: 2

    You could dress like a camel, shut out the lights in the stadium and sneak in unnoticed , like I did...

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  25. Re:Who Belongs... by flyneye · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmmm Superbowl in Dubai...
    I bet they would, NFL'd eat a dead rat sandwich if they thought it would profit them.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  26. Simpsons Did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they got thrown in "Superbowl Jail" too.

  27. Look like you belong... by LoRdTAW · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is one of the oldest tricks in the books. I used to work for an entertainment company lugging around equipment. I have been to many venues and big hotels in Manhattan and some are pretty secure, requiring you to sign in and have your picture taken. But there are plenty where all you do is is walk in there like you own the place and no one says anything. As long as you are carrying something then they assume you are part of some staff and just let you walk right in. Even the secure places just require you to say you are from company X for party Y and they let you in without any scrutiny. The parties are planned by a planner who is not part of the venue. So security has no way to easily contact the planner to verify if vendor x is legit or not. They just do their job which is to get a signature and hand out a flimsy sticker pass. If you use a little creative social engineering and figure out what party is happening where you could easily gain access. Even carrying around some legit looking paper work is enough to get you into a venue.

    Once we did a party in the museum of natural history, they have a private room in the back (I hear it was $20,000+ just to rent the room, rich kids, you should see some of the parties I have seen, amazing. Once I setup a million dollar bar mitzvah on the intrepid). Me and the guy I did the delivery with setup all the equipment and then walked down the hallway, jumped a set of ropes into the museum and went to the planetarium. No one stopped us or asked us what we were doing.

    Across the street where I live is a house which the owner defaulted on his loan. Well he also had a loan through two other banks so the house sits there as the banks cant agree on a decent price which would let it sell. So one day I hear the house was robbed of all its copper pipe, electrical wiring along with the boiler and hot water heater. One neighbour said he saw a van parked outside with some men working in the house. They weren't working but robbing the place. All they needed to do was look legit and no one would question them. Essentially its more difficult to gain access if you look suspicious or try to hide what you are doing.

    1. Re:Look like you belong... by sribe · · Score: 1

      One neighbour said he saw a van parked outside with some men working in the house. They weren't working but robbing the place. All they needed to do was look legit and no one would question them.

      Yep, unoccupied house next to mine, one day all the furniture went away in a moving van driven by thieves...

    2. Re:Look like you belong... by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if you want to rob someones house all you need to do is to stakeout the place for a few days to get the owners habits down and then come back with a van with lettering on the side. I have seen so many beat to shit vans with writing done in marker, spray paint and those black-lettering-on-gold house number stickers. They look like creepy rape vans but they are legit. So its impossible to know who is legit and who isn't. Just roll up in a van or pickup truck, wear a tool belt and your good to go. The tool belt easily conceals the fact that the hammer and screwdriver are to break open a door or window. also some phony paperwork can also help if a cop rolls up but honestly, cops would most likely pass by if it looked like an ordinary work crew. No one robs a home in the middle of the night wearing black anymore, its all done in broad daylight when people are at work.

      I bet you could just as easily walk down a street pretending to be a utility worker with a clip board and walk onto peoples property while looking at their power lines and meter. Then slip around the back and do a quick smash and grab.

  28. Easy ... by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Easy there... this is Slashdot and generally folks here who exploit weaknesses in security systems without regard for personal gain are on the white hat side of the field. Here's what should happen: these two will make their 15 minutes complete with a round of guest appearances on the morning show circuit, and if the story really catches on, maybe even culminating with a nighttime appearance on Letterman. If any lesson is to be learned from this breach by security forces, it is probably one they already suspect: their job is a hoax. It is impossible to keep an event like this secure and they are there to perpetrate the illusion of security. The Superbowl sites are picked years in advance. There are years for 'neer-do-wells to access the structures.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  29. The high use of subcontractors and contractors by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    The high use of subcontractors and contractors makes it even easier as you can say stuff like my firm does not give us ID's or just show some thing that looks like a work order.

  30. Con job by nycsubway · · Score: 1

    I remember this was called a con job. You con someone into believing you are someone else, just like conmen have been doing for thousands of years. There's nothing really new about it.

  31. Re:Who Belongs... by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

    It would in the Middle East.

    Or even Australia.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  32. Fletch by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    That is all.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  33. I dont even bother to watch the crap on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I be silly enough, after weasling my way in, subject myself to $7.00 hotdogs and $10.00 beers and 30 minute restroom line to dispose of said comestibles by physically attending a game? (captcha: molests)

  34. ENG cameras for free access to rock concerts by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    In a discussion about shoulder mount ENG cameras (are we getting to a point if it's shoulder mount, is it regarded as old technology including new $40K Panasonic HD with P2?). Someone said he attends lots of concerts for free. He stops by the news station, gets a non-working camera and gains access as media (does not show a badge but it's the impressive camera that does it). And if his girlfriend wants to join, he gets a microphone for her. He said at one concert the security guard wanted to be interviewed. So they did a interview of him with a dead mic and camera. After that had the best "seats" at the concert.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  35. Not a euphemism by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    It's just a more specific term. Social engineering is a particular type of deception, just like a salmon is a particular kind of fish.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  36. "didn't plan for ... success" !!! by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link about the Chaser APEC Prank. It is closer in that they were surprised by how far they got: Morrow pointed out that while they did extensive planning for the stunt, the one thing they "didn't plan for was success"; the participants were confused by the unexpected permission to enter the area, and unsure how to proceed; they clearly sensed danger, but the atmosphere was actually very quiet and subdued.

    1. Re:"didn't plan for ... success" !!! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I was in Sydney with my family the week before APEC. The day we checked out of our hotel there was a continuous stream of police officers checking in. I am sure the police were prepared for many eventualities but clearly not for a "gate crasher who strolls through the front door carrying a bottle of wine", so to speak.

  37. It ought to be a power of 2, because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply because the internal controller buffers of these storage devices are generally a power of 2 (typically 512 bytes), and certainly not a multiple of 10.
    Any advertisement mentionning a "MB, GB, etc" which is actually powers of 10 is misleading at best, if not a lie.

  38. Just find the guy that wrote the software by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    My boss wrote the software that controls the process of scanning tickets at the gate for another major company that puts on sporting events. By chance, he happened to mention that he built a backdoor into the software which will always cause the software to allow access when it scans a certain barcode, so basically if you have that barcode you can get an unlimited number of people into any event this company puts on (as long as the ticket looks legit enough to pass a visual inspection).

    Just goes to show that IT guys rule the world.

  39. Re:Who Belongs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm Superbowl in Dubai...
    I bet they would, NFL'd eat a dead rat sandwich if they thought it would profit them.

    The clientele of the Super Bowl tends to be wealthy, repeat customers so the long flight may not be an issue. If this venue expanded their viewership too, why the hell not?

  40. All they really needed was a clipboard and a voice by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    "Like con-men, spies know that in the work place, a clipboard is as good as a skeleton key."

    - Burn Notice

  41. Re:Who Belongs... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

    Given typical shitty stadium food, it's safe to say this has already been done for years.