Slashdot Mirror


PeerJ, A New Open Access Megajournal Launches

Mirk writes "Academic researchers want to make their papers open access for the world to read. If they use traditional publishers like Elsevier, Springer or Taylor & Francis, they'll be charged $3000 to bring their work out from behind the paywall. But PeerJ, a new megajournal launched today and funded by Tim O'Reilly, publishes open access articles for $99. That's not done by cutting corners: the editorial process is thorough, and they use rigorous peer-review. The cost savings come from running lean and mean on a born-digital system. The initial batch of 30 papers includes one on a Penn and Teller trick and one on the long necks of dinosaurs." $99 entitles you to publish an article a year, for life. $300 nets you unlimited articles published per year.

3 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Charging authors is not much better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The charge is a very small amount. One would think it is ~ 1% of the dollar value of time invested in writing the paper.

    What is achieves is to filter serious papers from frivolous ones and this cuts the total cost of peer reviewing them.

  2. Re:Charging authors is not much better... by sribe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other words, we still have some of the problems that open access should solve. While we no longer have the issue of individuals being unable to access knowledge, we are still saying that research can only be done by those with university affiliations or who are wealthy.

    A $99 one-time fee does not limit this to the "wealthy". If you can't afford $99, you're not likely to be able to do any meaningful research either.

  3. Re:Charging authors is not much better... by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Informative

    Charging authors to publish is not much better than charging people to read the articles

    Every journal I am aware of that uses any kind of peer review process does this. This system, however, is a lot cheaper. I recently publised in PLoS ONE and I had to pay around $1,500 for that. I really hope these guys can keep their publication costs down and manage to acquire some prestige so they get indexed in relevant places.

    What we truly need is a system that is paid for by universities, cooperatively, that allows anyone to submit a paper and allows anyone to download as many or as few papers as they would like.

    Some journals have tried that - look at the institutional memberships at PLoS (my institution is not a member) and BioMedCentral for example - the problem with that though is that memberships like that would usually be paid for by the school libraries and quite nearly every school in this country is trying to reduce their library expenditures.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.