Slashdot Mirror


Could New York City Cut Emissions 90% By 2050?

First time accepted submitter jscheib writes "According to Will Oremus in Slate, a report released today finds that 'New York City could slash its emissions by a whopping 90 percent by 2050 without any radical new technologies, without cutting back on creature comforts, and maybe even without breaking its budget.' The key elements are insulating buildings to cut energy needs, converting to (mostly) electric equipment, and then using carbon-free electricity to supply the small amount of energy still needed. Oremus notes that including energy savings would reduce the net price tag to something more like $20 billion."

7 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. It's Been Done Elsewhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In Detroit. The population's gone from 1M to 800k in twenty years, and energy consumption has plummeted. New York can emulate this success just by continuing it's current direction.

    1. Re:It's Been Done Elsewhere! by jklovanc · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to this article Detroit power consumption has dropped by 10% in eleven years. I would not call that plummeting..

    2. Re:It's Been Done Elsewhere! by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Funny

      Win-Win

  2. It's all about technology by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cutting CO2 mainly depends on technology (or cutting the standard of living, which most people don't want to do), aimed at two areas:

    1) Non-emitting cars. Electric cars look more viable every day; it's not inconceivable that most people could be driving them by by 2050.
    2) Power generation. Whether it comes from coal sequestration or my preferred solution, nuclear fusion, cutting CO2 relies on improvements in power generation technology.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  3. 38% energy savings by Namarrgon · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's what they achieved when they retrofitted the Empire State Building. Paid for itself in only 3 years, and now delivers $4.4M savings annually.

    Insulation, smart energy controls etc do cost money, but the energy savings can more than pay for it over the life of the building. Better designs can save up to 69% of energy costs. And there's a lot of ripple-effect savings too, by reducing emissions and freeing up capital.

    Of course, getting completely off coal, oil & gas will eventually cut emissions to zero, but there's a more immediate & guaranteed payoff simply by improving efficiencies.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  4. Replace the windows! by water-vole · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I stayed at a really fancy hotel in NYC, where enormous amounts of money had been spent on interior decoration. But the windows were single glass windows which let through a lot of cold and noise. You cannot buy such bad windows in many European countries. Why do they not install proper triple-glass windows? I have not seen any building in NY with proper windows. Do they not sell them in the US?

    1. Re:Replace the windows! by cute-boy · · Score: 4, Funny

      With double or triple glazing you wouldn't hear your neighbours whining so much?