Slashdot Mirror


Blogging Platform Posterous To Shut Down April 30

New submitter Mike Allton writes with the announcement from Posterous that the blogging platform will close at the end of April, after being acquired last year by Twitter. "It's been suggested that people should use platforms like Posterous or Google+ for their blog, and I think this is a perfect example of why that's a bad idea. When you use someone else's platform, you don't own your content and you don't have control over the platform. Do you have a Posterous account? What will you do with all your posts and content?"

15 of 94 comments (clear)

  1. Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nevere heard of them.
    Guess nothing of value will be lost.

    1. Re:Who? by sootman · · Score: 3, Informative

      They were a new, easy-to-use blogging platform that came out around the same time as Tumblr -- another new, easy-to-use blogging platform. You know how it often happens that two similar things come out around the same time and one takes off and one doesn't? That.

      One of their key features was that you could post from email, which a) made blogging accessible to a lot of people because "hey, posting is as easy as emailing!", and b) it worked (and worked well) from early smartphones before Apps took over the world. And you didn't have to make an account with them at first -- your email was your account.

      They had some good ideas, but that's just how these things go. For whatever reason, one company hits what others miss.

      Besides, they were bought by Twitter last year, so it's not like the owners are hungry, crying, and alone as they shut down their service. Most people figured they'd close up shop a lot sooner once they got bought.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  2. Well, you do get the content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And there is PostHaven now, launched by a co-founder of Posterous.

  3. Did you *read* TFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article gives specific instructions how to save all your blog content. In some cases, move it to another host. But you must do it before they shutdown. So the problem is ...??

    1. Re:Did you *read* TFA? by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure of why Google+ is mentioned, especially as it's one of the few that will allow you to easily extract all your data. Regardless, everyone should know that you're at the mercy of the whims of those that provide 'free' services. You should always know what the real 'cost' is, and have an escape plan you can use if required.

    2. Re:Did you *read* TFA? by Fri13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google+ was mentioned to gather clicks and cause discussion why Google+ is so terrible.

      Hell... the most of the WWW is terrible since corporations conquered it and we moved away from simple and good looking HTML sites to huge advertising competition and who designs most fancy animated page.

      Some days I think we would have been much better in times when email didn't have HTML coding possibilities and discussion happened in BBS/NNTP way instead HTML forums with huge banners, "billion of links" and signatures what people abuse etc. (we can always make things cleaner and good looking but HTML was way too easy slippery sloap what was offered to so called "designers" who could make any element of picture as link).

    3. Re:Did you *read* TFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > we moved away from simple and good looking HTML sites

      <body background=blink.gif><br><br><br><br><img src=under_construction.gif><br><marquee><font color=red><blink><i>TOTALLY</i> agree</blink>. It was <b>much</b> better in GeoCities' times</font></marquee><br><img src=under_construction.gif><br><embed src=rickroll.mid autostart=true autoplay=true hidden=true/></body>

  4. Shrinking Intelect by warewolfsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Gone are the days of our lives, now its life in 156 characters or less...

  5. A warning to people exporting to WordPress by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Informative

    The WordPress import uses an XML file for import of text, tags, etc. but reads the images from Posterous while parsing the xml. This means that people who delete their blogs before import, or presumably who wait until after the end of April so not get their images imported, The images are in the backup .zip file but if you wait too long you could have to re-add them all manually.

  6. wget it and forget it. err.. rehost it somewhere. by atomize · · Score: 5, Informative

    wget -r -l inf -k -E -p -nc http://www.yourposterousblog.com/

  7. Broader Perspective by inglorion_on_the_net · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you use someone else's platform, you don't own your content and you don't have control over the platform.

    This is true. On the other hand, you are also shifting the maintenance burden to someone else. Keeping the software up to date w.r.t. features, bug fixes, or at least security fixes. Fighting spam. Keeping the platform that the software runs on (operating system, hardware) usable. Making sure backups are kept up to date and regularly tested.

    It's a trade-off, and there are good reasons for wanting to be in control and good reasons for wanting others to do the work.

    I think the real solution to the control issue, in many cases, is to make sure it is easy to get the data out and use it, and then regularly get a copy of the data you care about and store it somewhere. Exactly like making a backup, which you should be doing no matter who hosts the data, you or someone else. If you do this, you are protected against data loss and unwanted changes.

    If you make sure you always have usable backups of your data, the only thing you still need to worry about is other people using that data. To some extent, that is something you need to worry about no matter who hosts the data, but, of course, the realistic threats are somewhat different for, say, hosting the data only on computers only you have an account on vs. hosting the data on a computer that is maintained by someone else. For me, personally, I have no issue having my website on someone else's computer, but I do have an issue with this for email.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  8. Re:Friendica by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, own your own WEBSITE. That's the only way to be sure. The downside isn't cost, you can get hosting for $15 per year. The downside is nobody will read it -- but they don't anyway.

    Me, I just use slashdot. It's good enough for my purposes.

  9. Re:Content by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not clear how you would lose your data. You can download everything into a zip file. Then you can either parse the stuff yourself or use the import facility at Wordpress or Squarespace. It is probably good advice to make sure you have another copy of everything you depend on the cloud for, but this shutdown is not a good example of what can go wrong.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  10. Re:this sucks by noh8rz10 · · Score: 3, Informative

    the summary is being a bit overdramatic. you can download all of your posts into a zip: http://blog.posterous.com/posterous-spaces-backup-tool-available-now.