Slashdot Mirror
Ask Slashdot: Dealing With an Advanced Wi-Fi Leech?
An anonymous reader writes "Recently, I had found out (through my log files) that my wireless router was subject to a Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) brute force PIN attack. After looking on the Internet and discovering that there are indeed many vulnerabilities to WPS, I disabled it. After a few days, I noticed that I kept intermittently getting disconnected at around the same time every day (indicative of a WPA deauthentication handshake capture attempt). I also noticed that an evil twin has been set up in an effort to get me to connect to it. Through Wi-Fi monitoring software, I have noticed that certain MAC addresses are connected to multiple WEP and WPA2 access points in my neighborhood. I believe that I (and my neighbors) may be dealing with an advanced Wi-Fi leech. What can I do in this situation? Should I bother purchasing a directional antenna, figuring out exactly where the clients are situated, and knocking on their door? Is this something the local police can help me with?"
Reality must not have read the same law you did
http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/criminal/many-killers-who-go-free-with-florida-stand-your-ground-law-have-history/1241378
It would also seem that only men are allowed to stand their ground:
http://www.care2.com/causes/stand-your-ground-fails-abused-wife.html
The previous self defense law in Florida was perfectly fine. If you felt threatened and had no way to escape you were justified in using lethal force. Stand your ground essentially took away the "and you have no way to escape" part of the law such that you can always use lethal force if you feel threatened. On top of that it added language so broad that it's comical. It also introduced punishments (yes punishments) for police departments which arrest somebody who is later found to have been within the new stand your ground law. That is not rational policy. If the police find someone dead and you say you shot them, you go to jail and your self defense or not is determined by state prosecutors and ultimately a judge and jury. Self defense is a determination made by the justice system, NOT by law enforcement. Punishing police departments for doing their lawful duty is absolutely stupid. It's a great way to make sure almost nobody ever gets arrested for murder as long as the dead guy was in their house.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
You forget that Martin is black, and Zimmerman is white.
Therefore, according to the rules of racial and cultural Marxism as defined by Antonio Gramsci, Zimmerman is GUILTY.
Not just of MURDERING Martin, but of any and all bad things that ever happened to him or anyone else in his entire family.
Zimmerman is guilty, and Martin innocent, not because of what either of them did or did not do, but because of the tribal groups they belong to. People with paler complexions have, at various times and places, done bad things to people with darker complexions. Therefore the darker complected people alive today are granted moral superiority over lighter complected people. It does not matter that neither the paler nor the darker people alive today have anything to do with these past wrongs. It does not matter that none of them are victims and none of them are perpetrators. A skin-deep resemblance to past victims or past perpetrators is sufficient to cast one in the role of victim or perpetrator, with penalties or compensation doled out accordingly.
Zimmerman will go to prison for the crime of defending himself against a member of a group he was not allowed to protect himself from. White people in the antebellum south were allowed to beat black people and smash their heads into the ground. Therefore black people are allowed to do the same thing to white people today. White people who resist will be treated the same way a black person would have been in the past. This is Social Justice.
Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.