Slashdot Mirror


Mosquitoes Beginning To Ignore DEET Repellent

Copper Nikus writes "An article at the BBC makes a shocking claim about mosquitoes. It appears some individual insects in the wild have developed the ability to ignore the very popular DEET repellent after a first exposure. From the article: 'To investigate why this might be happening, the researchers attached electrodes to the insects' antenna. Dr Logan explained: "We were able to record the response of the receptors on the antenna to Deet, and what we found was the mosquitoes were no longer as sensitive to the chemical, so they weren't picking it up as well. "There is something about being exposed to the chemical that first time that changes their olfactory system - changes their sense of smell - and their ability to smell Deet, which makes it less effective."'"

22 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Umm, yeah by Desler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, it's called evolution.

    1. Re:Umm, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      you shut your devil whore mouth

    2. Re:Umm, yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He probably is. Cynicism gets you modded up on Slashdot.

    3. Re:Umm, yeah by countach · · Score: 5, Funny

      I must be evolving too, because I can't smell my aftershave as much when I've got used to it.

    4. Re:Umm, yeah by Desler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that doesn't seem to be the mechanism here

      Really?

      Dr Logan said it was vital to understand both these permanent genetic and temporary olfactory changes that were taking place.

      He said: "Mosquitoes are very good at evolving very very quickly."

      So there are genetic chsnges being attributed to this along with the scientist saying mosquitos are good at evolving quickly. Yeah, clearly it's not evolution. *rolls eyes*

      But, you know, don't let that stop this thread turning into another Evil Religion Suppresses Science flame-fest.

      Funny, no one was doing that. Defensive much?

    5. Re:Umm, yeah by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a difference.

      This is more like a human losing sensitivity to skunk or ammonia smells for the rest of their life... after smelling them once.

      It is really more akin to some humans who have unhealthy very bad digestive systems until they get a stomach parasite infection.. once.

      Then they are fine the rest of their lives.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:Umm, yeah by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're assigning way too much intelligence to evolutionary processes. Evolution is more of a by-product than a directed process in the way that you are thinking.

      Any one mosquito may have had a random mutation that makes them more or less tolerant of DEET. The mosquitoes the ones who are more repelled by DEET are more likely to die from lack of food, so each generation the mosquitos who are most tolerant - through whatever means - are the ones that reproduce. The cycle repeats for their kids. Overall the trend will be towards greater resistance.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  2. Next step? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh great, the next step is anyone with DEET gets swarmed by these little bastards. Think about it, once they learn it's not that bad, where else do they smell DEET but fresh blood sources?

  3. It's the will of God! by sv_libertarian · · Score: 4, Funny

    This only proves that the ways and will of God is ineffable. To even suggest it's evolution in action is blasphemy.

    1. Re:It's the will of God! by rrhal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hold on now, I have uncontestable proof that God has eff'ed me over many times.

      Mary, don't exaggerate; it was just the one time.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. Mark Twain
  4. Re:Any documented instance... by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Informative

    sure, tons of evidence. dead mosquitoes ignore everything.

  5. Re:More blood on Rachel Carson's hards by Shompol · · Score: 5, Informative
    Quite interesting how political agendas make their way to school.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Carson#Criticisms_of_environmentalism_and_DDT_restrictions

    John Quiggin and Tim Lambert have written that "the most striking feature of the claim against Carson is the ease with which it can be refuted." DDT was never banned for anti-malarial use,[85] (its ban for agricultural use in the United States in 1972 did not apply outside the US or to anti-malaria spraying;[86] the international treaty that banned most uses of DDT and other organochlorine pesticides — the 2001 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants — included an exemption for DDT for the use of malaria control until affordable substitutes could be found.[79]) Mass outdoor spraying of DDT was abandoned in poor countries subject to malaria, such as Sri Lanka, in the 1970s and 1980s, not because of government prohibitions, but because the DDT had lost its ability to kill the mosquitoes.[79] (Because of insects very short breeding cycle and large number of offspring, the most resistant insects that survive and pass on their genetic traits to their offspring replace the pesticide-slain insects relatively rapidly. Agricultural spraying of pesticides produces resistance to the pesticide in seven to ten years.[87])

  6. Patent "Natural Selection" by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then charge the mosquitoes a license fee to evolve.

    That should stop them.

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  7. Re:Bow down by bobstreo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it will take longer for them to become resistant to the lasers:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosquito_laser

  8. Re:evolution by jbeaupre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was a sci-fi short story in Analog years ago that involved human evolution an junk food. The plot involved people getting mysteriously ill, even dying. Epidemiologists linked it to eating healthy. They discovered that humans had evolved to use caramel coloring as an essential vitamin. Eliminating it from your diet was as dangerous as eliminating vitamin C.

    I think about that story every time I see caramel coloring listed as an ingredient in food.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  9. Re:Mosquito Extinction Campaign by Desler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe but maybe not. And if those creatures die off too it will continue to ripple. This is why your idea is majorly naive and short-sighted.

  10. Use the mosquito's natural drives against it by Beeftopia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a device I've used with some success that works ONLY against bloodsuckers. It's called a "Mosquito Magnet".

    Mosquitoes are attracted to things with blood. They apparently track their food by warmth, exhaled carbon dioxide, and a few other chemicals. This devices emits warmth, carbon dioxide and a few other chemicals in an attractant. The device is quite sensitive though. I've placed a battery driven model outside, under a small wooden table, to protect it from the elements. It definitely captures mosquitoes but sometimes it makes a difference, sometimes it doesn't. Mine is 5 years old. Last year it was... eh. Not as dramatic as year 1. I need to get it serviced this year I suppose.

    Anyhoo, focusing on something like the mosquito's natural drives to attract them to a trap might be the Next Big Thing. Note that bug zappers don't attract mosquitos.

  11. Re:evolution by Gordo_1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What makes you think that our rightful genetic destiny must be toward smarter and smarter human beings? We may have reached a point where evolutionarily, we're already as smart as we're likely ever to get due to pressures that you nor I can completely comprehend. What we're starting to understand is that evolution proceeds in fits and starts and many dead ends toward a somewhat unpredictable concept of 'fittest'.

  12. Pest management basics by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't use the same chemicals too often as small insects adapt to it quite fast. Just ask weed growers how well their toxic miticides don't work on spider mites anymore. I bet the weed you're smoking has Avid, Floramite, Monitor, Forbid or othe rnasties on it as some are resorting to using them at WAY more potent mixes and past the residual time of the chemical.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  13. Re:evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, humans are continuing to evolve. Only the selective pressures are different.

    The traits that are now selected for are those that are suited for our human-altered world in which dangerous things have warning labels, not those traits that used to be wonderful 20,000 years ago on the savannah, but that's the whole point.

    Similarly, those who you call "genetically weak" aren't. They might have been were genetically weak on the savannah when your support group consisted of 20 uneducated protohumans, but in a world filled with medicine and technology, they are perfectly fine, and better adapted than some schmuck who puts all his energy into making powerful immune systems to destroy smallpox viruses and guinea worms that no longer exist.

  14. Re:How is this insightful? by Doubting+Sapien · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would go so far as to even say GP is wrong. The article describes how experiments show the mosquito's olfactory system appears to loose sensitivity to DEET after the first exposure. There is no supporting evidence that conclusively points to this being due to evolutionary change. A more appropriate characterization is simply that the insect's nervous system is being down-regulated in responsiveness to this particular chemical. In other words, the mosquito adapts by learning to ignore some noxious gunk in order to get a blood meal. If such is the case, the insect is simply showing that it can be conditioned with the right stimuli. This is neural-plasticity, not evolution.

    --
    ========== "Hello World" in my programming language of choice: ATG - LET THERE BE LIFE - TAG ==========
  15. Re:evolution by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Interestingly, not so long ago I read about evolution in humans, and how that is actually speeding up currently.

    And that makes total sense to me, considering the huge changes we made to our environment over the past couple hundred years. Urbanisation, industrialisation - it requires different skills than farming.