Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Will Soon Block Third-Party Cookies

An anonymous reader writes "Stanford researcher Jonathan Mayer has contributed a Firefox patch that will block third-party cookies by default. It's now on track to land in version 22. Kudos to Mozilla for protecting their users and being so open to community submissions. The initial response from the online advertising industry is unsurprisingly hostile and blustering, calling the move 'a nuclear first strike.'"

6 of 369 comments (clear)

  1. just block all cookies by manicpop · · Score: 5, Informative

    The great thing about Firefox is you can block all cookies by default, and whitelist only specific domains. Just block everything except ones you know you need (like maybe your banking site). Use "allow for session" for sites that need cookies for some reason but you don't need to save permanent data. There's also a great extension called "Cookie Monster" that will let you set all those options on a per-domain basis from the status bar.

  2. Re:Feature Request: remove all cookies EXCEPT by rihkama · · Score: 5, Informative

    I regularly clean out my cookies with "delete all", but I'd prefer to keep the ones for sites that require a login. But it's too hard to delete cookies individually.

    You can achieve that in Firefox without any extra extensions: Under Privacy: 1. Use Custom settings for history - Accept cookies from sites - Keep until: I close Firefox 2. Under Exceptions: - Add sites you want to allow permanent cookies sites using "Allow" button Done. Sites you allow can store cookies until they expire while other cookies are cleared every time you close the browser.

  3. Not that simple (Re:Online Advertising Response) by Giorgio+Maone · · Score: 5, Informative

    The patch is not exactly a one-liner, because the implemented behavior is not as straight-forward as just "block 3rd party cookies".

    It's "block cross-site cookies from origins which I've not visited yet as a 1st party websites and have already 1st party cookies from".

    This means, for instance, that Facebook, Google and Twitter gets likely a free-pass to track almost anybody.

    And that once you (accidentally or not) click any ad box, you give a free-pass to its advertising agency too.

    --
    There's a browser safer than Firefox, it is Firefox, with NoScript
  4. Insanity laden cookies by WaffleMonster · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you have some spare time restart your browser, fire up wireshark and filter for DNS queries then go to just the home page of any of a bazillion web sites... It is insane... one single page load of something like cnn,fox,nbc,forbes translates into 20-30 of dns queries for all manner of advertising and market intelligence companies.. Everyone knows this stuff exists but I was genuinly shocked by the volume and number of sites involved.

    If it isn't cookies it will be fingerprinting, flash cookies, DNS cache probing + IP but we can work to mitigate these things as well.

  5. Re:A nuclear first strike... by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Informative

    incorporating AdBlockPlus and NoScript and enabling both by default.

    Quite a few websites (whether intentionally or not) make it difficult to figure out which domain needs to run javascript for them to function. It is often _not_ the current domain. So users will end up choosing "Enable all scripts (dangerous)" option with NoScript sooner or later.

    Also, when the webpage redirects you to a processor for finalizing a payment, a lot of work can be lost. Cannot go back without losing entered data and cannot complete the payment because reload will screw things up. NoScript should really ask you "Click redirects to a different domain -- enable scripts there?"

  6. Re:Online Advertising Response by nedlohs · · Score: 5, Informative

    For firefox: network.http.sendRefererHeader, set it to 0 in about:config