Slashdot Mirror


British Farmers Growing Their Own Internet Service

pigrabbitbear writes "Look outside of your window: if you see miles of farmland, chances are you have terrible internet service. That's because major telecommunications companies don't think it's worth the investment to bring high-speed broadband to sparsely populated areas. But like most businesses, farms increasingly depend on the internet to pay bills, monitor the market and communicate with partners. In the face of a sluggish connection, what's a group of farmers to do? Grow their own, naturally. That's what the people of Lancashire, England, are doing. Last year, a coalition of local farmers and others from the northwestern British county began asking local landowners if they could use their land to begin laying a brand-new community-owned high-speed network, sparing them the expense of tearing up roads. Then, armed with shovels and backhoes, the group, called Broadband for the Rural North, or B4RN (it's pronounced 'barn'), began digging the first of what will be approximately 180,000 meters of trenches and filling them with fiber-optic cable, all on its own."

17 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Or... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could just lobby your legislators to pass a law requiring ISPs to provide sparse areas with cheap broadband access, effectively subsidizing the internet costs of a few by raising rate on everyone else. I mean that's how government works right? Everyone lobbies their legislature for special favors until everyone has special favors and everyone is paying for everyone else's stuff in addition to providing much needed jobs for lawyers, lobbyists, politicians, regulators, etc.

    Forming a private cooperative to build their own internet infrastructure seems like a perversion of the crony capitalist system that is the foundation of western society.

    1. Re:Or... by Microlith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Forming a private cooperative to build their own internet infrastructure seems like a perversion of the crony capitalist system that is the foundation of western society.

      Oh please. You know what's "crony capitalist?" Bullshit like states banning municipal broadband at the demand of local telco monopolies so that they don't have to compete with better service.

      We've already tried forcing them to spread into more rural areas, all they did was raise rates and mark up impressive profits.

    2. Re:Or... by mk1004 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Power and telephone service to rural areas were subsidized in the US, back before everyone got the "no one else can play with my stuff" attitude that permeates this country today. Internet access could be done the same way, and probably would have been if it had been developed in the '50s. For that matter, nationalized healthcare probably could have been done too. Yes, I'm sure some people didn't like the power/telephone subsidizes back then, but there were enough people who thought it was the right thing to do.

      --
      I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
    3. Re:Or... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In all seriousness why do we want access in rural areas to be subsidized? If it is expensive to bring access to these places, why shouldn't it be the ones who want it to pay for it?

      Economies of scale is one of the benefits of living in an urban area. You get cheap internet, cheap water, cheap electricity, cheap garbage collection, cheap sewer, etc. When you live out in the boonies the land is cheap, but you don;t get the benefits of living in a metropolis.

      If you want to live in the forest, that's awesome. If you want high speed internet in the forest, then I support allowing you to have the fewest restrictions possible to allow you to pay for that getting that infrastructure yourself. I don't think it's fair to subsidize rural internet costs anymore than it would be fair to subsidize rent in urban because it's "too expensive". The free market decides what things cost, and we should be trying to achieve a free market (externalities accounted for) so that everyone pays the true cost of what they consume (people, corporations, everybody).

    4. Re:Or... by tibit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are you serious? Rural America votes, and their votes affect you. Do you really want them not to have at least potential access to the wealth of knowledge and "dissent" that Internet offers? Consider the alternatives: they'll only listen to the local ClearChannel station and watch Fox News OTA. I'm not saying an average Joe Redneck is reading random wikipedia article each day to edify himself, but your way of thinking makes it not merely improbable: it becomes impossible.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    5. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ever wonder how the "no one else can play with my stuff" attitude came about?

      It comes from the freeloaders that benefited from these improvements all their life but don't want to do anything for their kids.

      Did I get that right?

      It certainly wasn't the boomers that were building anything in the 50s or 60s. But they are certainly the ones with a giant sense of entitlement and the "not paying for that!" attitude.

    6. Re:Or... by kermidge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "It certainly wasn't the boomers that were building anything in the 50s or 60s."

            And you think that they should have been building stuff then?

            You might consider that, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, baby boomers are those who were born between 1945 - 1964.
            For instance, I was born in 1947. What do you think I should have been building in, say, 1960, when I was all of 13 years old? Or 1967 maybe, when I was 20? (Now, by then I did work in the construction trades, but hadn't the capital to even leverage buying land and setting up construction projects; I wasn't precocious enough for your liking, I guess.)
            And for someone born in '64, I suppose you're really bent out of shape that the greatest building projects for a 6-year old likely involved Lego or somesuch.

            As for the 'sense of entitlement'....
            You'd have to search far and wide to find someone in my parent's generation who hadn't been affected by The Great Depression (as it was known, although it seems there's one of those every other generation or so) and World War II - both thoroughly global things.
            So, no, we didn't have to deal with either of them directly, although the aftermath of each had some lasting effects on attitudes, behaviours, values, politics and law.
            Sure, our parents, having gone through some real shit, generally wanted to see to it that their children didn't have to - 'cuz it was some serious bad shit, the kind that was bad enough that a grown-up mostly wouldn't wish even an enemy to experience.
            As a result of all those good wishes, some of us were spoiled, some still came up hardscrabble, and, as in most things done by humans when nothing special is going on, most of us just came up in the middle of the muddle, as it were.
            Overall, the watchword was opportunity - we tended to have better schools, better clothes, better medical care, better diet than did our parents generation, so we may have taken those things for granted.
            The cultural, social, and psychological stuff, that was a mixed bag. There were some little things, the undeclared war in Southeast Asia (first advisors, 1955, first combat troops, 1965), the Cold War (duck and cover, mother-fucker), the commie hunt, the wonderful Cuban missile circus, all the various civil rights issues. Nothing special, really.

            But maybe you had your own fun in the Sandbox, I dunno.

  2. It's a race by paiute · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who will be faster - the ditch diggers or the telecom lobbyists demanding the end to such community ditch digging?

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:It's a race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who will be faster - the ditch diggers or the telecom lobbyists demanding the end to such community ditch digging?

      You do realise this is a story about Britain, don't you? Maybe it's different where you're from but here BT really couldn't give a monkey's what farmers get up to in the places where they themselves can't be bothered to lay down decent lines. Nor do they "lobby" together with their competitors... on account of them not really having any when it comes to telephone infrastructure.

      I might as well just give up hope of ever getting a story about the UK where the comments section isn't nearly-instantly filled with Americans who have very little idea of how things are different here and instead of asking questions - never mind insightful or thought-provoking ones - just post comments about how it would work in places that the story isn't referring to. Anything that is worth reading just ends up buried in a sea of irrelevances.

  3. Re:NOTHING IS EVER THEIR FAULT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    For Extra Credit Ways To Be a DOUCHEBAG:

    Get a job as a Slashdot editor.
    Never, ever, ever, ever, EVER use a spell-checker. No matter what. This is CRITICAL.
    Whatever the fuck you do, don't ever proofread either. Yeah that's what an editor would do, but you're special.
    Post stories that are themselves flamebait, to drive up page views.
    Never link to an informative site that gets to the point. Instead, drive traffic to your buddy's shitty blog and let posters provide good links.
    Or, link to a paywall site when free articles are available.
    Laugh at nigger jokes and other troll posts. Then use your infinite mod-points to mod them down to -1.
    Never review a book you don't like.
    Never disclose whether or not you financially benefit from book reviews.
    Play different camps against each other to drive up page views. E.g. Microsoft vs. Linux vs. Apple.
    Repost^H^H^H^H^^H Recycle old stories. You could mod down people who point it out.
    Obsess over patents because there is NOTHING ELSE going on in the world of technology.
    Mod this post down too because it's true and that makes you uncomfortable.
    Mod +5 Funny idiotic regurgitations of tired old memes that weren't very funny to begin with (sharks with lasers on their heads, etc) because you have no social life and feel so desperate to be part of a group, any kind of group.

  4. Re:some places have it ready already by PPH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The city of Tacoma has their own fiber network. Put in by their power company for the purpose of controlling their substations, it turned out to have some extra capacity. Some Eastern Washington State power PUDs, awash in cash from their hydro power sales have strung fiber around their largely rural, agricultural service territories as well.

    Since then, the telcoms have sought legislative injunctions against public utilities implementing new systems. And the private utility I used to work for was scared sh*tless about their wrath to the point of never putting in fiber even restricted to their own internal requirements.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  5. Re:home groan by rarumberger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, maybe they thought someone might pronounce it "be foreign", which would cause an instant negative response from American readers?

  6. They're more American than Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was a time when the same sort of thing would happen in the USA, but who in the USA today would dare run afoul of one of the literally thousands of Federal regulations that MIGHT apply to them?

    The Federal government is so powerful that it's created a generation of Americans that sit frozen unable to solve problems for themselves out of fear that some distance authority will swoop in and punish them. There is nothing anymore that can be done without their permission.
    Land of the free and home of the brave? Hardly.

    I have a pretty radical socialist Czech friend living in the US that said that the problem with American politics is that it requires everyone agree. Every problem has to solved at the federal level and it prevents things from getting done.

    When even a European socialist complains that the US central government is too powerful, you know there is a problem.

  7. Re:Optic? by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Informative

    Optical works in the snow, ice, storms and other UK conditions.
    Placing a good antenna on a roof and then getting the aim to the next site is not cheap.
    Placing a good antenna on a perfectly positioned roof may not be allowed due to historic building listing.
    Placing a good antenna on a tower might need gov approval and the costs can then go up with expert advice and paperwork.
    The new expensive tower might not even allow good 24/7 connections.
    A wireless box in a field or wood might attract 'easy' theft, property damage or free data use.
    Optical is the neat generational fix. You can always blow in new cable if needed.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  8. Re:some places have it ready already by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Telecoms lose money in rural areas. Even with phone service. This has been a problem since the invention of the telephone. The solution? Give the telephone company monopoly over a large area, but require them by law to provide service to rural residents. Just how far rural they go will be negotiated between the local municipality and the telco. Putting in rural service is not profitable, but the telco can raise rates in the metropolitan areas to make up the difference.

    Now, some jackass comes along claiming free market and starts selling his own service. He offers it to whomever he likes, is under no obligation to provide service to anyone, and can undercut the telco in the easiest to serve markets. If you want free and open competition in these markets, that's fine. But you need to lift the regulations the telcos are under before you can do that. There are some areas of the country were the local phone company is required by law to maintain dialtone and 911 service even if the house is vacant or condemned. Just in case some homeless person needs to use the phone. How can a company that has to do maintain service like that compete with random competitors that have no such obligations? A free and open market for internet service means NO rural internet service at all. Simple as that. It's not profitable, and an open market means it can't exist.

  9. Re:NOTHING IS EVER THEIR FAULT! by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or, publish a completely off-topic rant that annoys everyone who came here for intelligent commentary. Oh, and post it A/C.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  10. Re:some places have it ready already by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Telecoms lose money in rural areas. Even with phone service

    That's debatable. The value of the phone network is that it can reach pretty much anyone that you want to be able to reach. A phone network that only covered major cities would be a lot less valuable to everyone. Lots of people didn't bother getting phones until coverage was almost universal, because there's no point if they can't use it to call their rural relatives. You may lose money on the individual lines, but you gain money from all of the people who join because those lines exist.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News