Slashdot Mirror
Editorial In ACM On Open Access Publishing In Computer Science
call -151 writes "An editorial appearing in the ACM notices complains about the effects of the Elsevier boycott particularly with respect to academics refusing to do unpaid review for for-profit journals, particularly the extortionate Elsevier journals. Mathematician Tim Gowers's post gave energy to this about a year ago and recently he reflected on progress in several directions, including developing new arXIv overlay journals. Not disclosed in the ACM editorial is that the author serves on three Elsevier editorial boards; I take it that his complaining about the difficulty of finding referees is an indication that the boycott is having some good effect. Open access issues in academic publishing have been discussed on Slashdot before and it's a good sign that the broader issue has been getting good exposure, including a reasonable White House directive in response to a strong petition effort."
unfortunately if we start doing that, we would realize that a huge number of scientific data are simply falsified, plagiarized, fraudulent, or flat out stupid.
the entire PHD industry would grind to a halt, and the 'part-time adjunct associate staff member intern' would no longer be able to teach all of Calculus 1-3 in front of a hall of 500 students.
after that, the administrators would no longer be able to fuck their secretaries or spend 50,000 dollars putting a pink oval of flowers outside of their window