Slashdot Mirror


Chinese IT Ministry Looks Askance At Google's Control of Android

itwbennett writes "In what one expert is calling a clear message to China's tech industry that the authorities want to support a homegrown mobile operating system, China's tech regulator warns in a white paper that the country is becoming too dependent on Google's Android OS. 'Our country's mobile operating system research and development is heavily reliant on Android,' reads the white paper from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. 'Although the Android system currently remains open source, the core technologies and technology roadmap is strictly controlled by Google.'"

118 comments

  1. Centralized government to Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pot, kettle, black.

    1. Re:Centralized government to Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :) will be fun to watch Android drown in China like Google Search did.

  2. Then... Use your usual techniques? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And create your own cheap knockoff?

    1. Re:Then... Use your usual techniques? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      But most of the cheap knockoffs *run* android.

    2. Re:Then... Use your usual techniques? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      <racism>Andloid?</racism>

    3. Re:Then... Use your usual techniques? by dj245 · · Score: 1

      But most of the cheap knockoffs *run* android.

      As someone with a Chinese tablet (Ainol Novo 7 Flame) that runs android, I can safely say 2 things-

      1. They are not knockoffs. The midrange to high end Chinese tablets often have better or more features than ones pushed by big american companies. Micro-SD slots, support for 3G dongles, HDMI out, front AND rear cameras at a non-stupid price etc. Sure, there are a lot of really horrible sub-$100 chinese tablets out there. But you can get a very nice device which is on par with the Nexus 7/10 for 70-80% of the price. Chinese companies push new and better versions much faster than American companies.

      There are disadvantages (market fragmentation and model confusion, the low end is really low, questionable lifecycle support) and advantages (nobody pushing you to use "their" store, adding internal memory isn't stupidly expensive, micro-SD slots, bleeding-edge technology is available before anybody else, etc) to the Chinese tabletmaker approach. They are different devices for different people.

      2. Chinese companies generally do whatever they feel like doing with the software and couldn't care less about what Google or any other american company would want them to do.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    4. Re:Then... Use your usual techniques? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. What they run is a hacked to hell version of Android that is usually broken in many respects. Also expect to see no or very few updates, as they tend to release new "models" more frequently than I change my socks... (-> once that happens they effectively ignore that they ever produced anything other than the currently in production models).

      The real point should've been that they're really stuck with what the SoC mfgs provide, given that they control release of all the BLOB bits and source trees for their SoCs. (Most of those Chinese versions of Android use relatively ancient kernel versions grafted into more or less relatively current Android code bases which they then apparently hack-to-hell and break in so many irritating ways for God knows what reason...)

  3. Poor PRC commies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can't impose proper surveillance on their people :

    1. Re:Poor PRC commies by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd rather avoid either - but if I had the choice, I'd take the "Zionist" over government.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. Fork it by kimvette · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't like it? Fork it. It's like the typical copycat bullshit China usually does, only better. Others have already taken the initiative:

    http://news.yahoo.com/three-android-forks-exist-today-135000744.html

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Fork it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There's no information whatsoever on those forks. What's forky about them? Will they actually be maintained, or are they just customized builds kicked out once for a device? Does that article have any purpose other than to advertise the Nook Color and Kindle and badmouth the Chinese?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re: Fork it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Although the Android system currently remains open source, the core technologies and technology roadmap is strictly controlled by Google.'

      Isn't the core technology actually the kernel, and strictly controlled by Linus Torvalds?

    3. Re: Fork it by HaZardman27 · · Score: 1

      Just wait until he chews out one of the PRC's devs for blaming something on a userspace app!

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    4. Re: Fork it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, no. They could conceivably switch to, e.g., a BSD-based kernel without impacting the userspace. Device manufacturers would be upset at needing to rewrite drivers, of course, but the end-user wouldn't notice.

    5. Re:Fork it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      A process for taking control of the OS at the "core" level already exists. And, with China's well-known propensity to outright steal IP and rebrand it as its own, you'd be a fool to think that they're unaware of how easy this process is.

    6. Re: Fork it by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I'd pay a little to watch that video. But, only if everyone is speaking in English. I don't even know how to cuss or ask for a beer in Chinese.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re: Fork it by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't even know how to cuss or ask for a beer in Chinese.

      Pok gai -- aw yiu bia jou!

    8. Re: Fork it by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      jesus, even the chinese won't understand you...

    9. Re:Fork it by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or even better - PARTICIPATE. The Android Open Source project is there for a reason.

      Manufacturers who want to guide the direction Android goes technologically will work with Google - for example, Sony is a heavy contributor to AOSP. The results of this show with their newer devices, which are far more well integrated than older ones. It's a win-win situation for Sony, Google, and users in general.

      But Chinese manufacturers just want to steal and not do any work. Seriously, they have stealing refined to such an art that IF YOU GIVE IT TO THEM FOR FREE THEY STILL MANAGE TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO STEAL IT! (Note that nearly every Chinese handset is in noncompliance with the GPL under which the kernel is licensed. Not just halfassed pseudo-compliance like HTC and Samsung with source code that obviously doesn't match what shipped, but full on complete noncompliance with zero kernel source whatsoever.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    10. Re: Fork it by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      I think that was one of the complaints among the cast of 'Serenity' and 'Firefly'.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re: Fork it by SilentStaid · · Score: 1

      This is actually part of the American cyber-warfare strategy. They're just waiting for China to try to implement a secure-boot function for mobile devices based on the Linux kernel.

      Hell hath no fury like Linus, apparently.

    12. Re: Fork it by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      well, Firefly wasn't that bad :) They were just heavily accented, but still acceptable. An example would be a frenchman speaking english - accented, but still understandable.

    13. Re: Fork it by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1

      Someone will just fall on the street over that.

  5. Don't they have the source code? by kwanbis · · Score: 1

    Fork it and do not depend on google.

    1. Re:Don't they have the source code? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      You misread. They can copy the source code for the public parts all they want. They're whining about all the proprietary parts.

      It turns out they have no capability to actually create their own stuff, and they want their secret sauce too.

    2. Re:Don't they have the source code? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      So.. they're whining.

      Ignore them. Thread over. Let them do what they want to do. That's their rights as human beings, bit we're within *our* rights to say frag off and ignore them.

    3. Re:Don't they have the source code? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It's amusing because Google only 'controls the technology roadmap' because the other candidates seem to draw their software and UI dev teams directly from the same talent pool that produces ghastly shovelware to be preloaded on cheap consumer wintels. It's to the point where 'flagship device' means 'not fucked up by OEMs'...

      It's honestly pretty pathetic. If anything, some of the anonymous Chinese KiRF vendors are better than the big names, since they don't have the time or money to waste on custom skins or abortive attempts at their own apps stores, or whatnot.

  6. I AIN"T GONNA BUY NO CHINESE OS !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your spies are belong to us !!

    Huawet and ZTE can suck my hairy vagina !!

    1. Re:I AIN"T GONNA BUY NO CHINESE OS !! by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I could use a good sucking.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  7. Chinese OS? by coyote_oww · · Score: 1

    Who in their right mind would install a chinese OS on their device, unless it was Open Source. And i'd still be nervous even then.

    1. Re:Chinese OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese perhaps?

    2. Re:Chinese OS? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Who in their right mind would install a Google OS on their device, unless it was Open Source. And i'd still be nervous even then.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Chinese OS? by fredprado · · Score: 1

      If you intend to use a Chinese phone you will have to trust the company even. Even if you can inspect the source there is no guarantee the binary came from it and wasn't tampered. Unless of course you intend to build it yourself and flash the phone, but even them there is no guarantee the bootloader wasn't tampered either.

      That is not a problem exclusive with Chinese phones, by the way. I actually am much less worried about anything Chinese companies would put in my phone than about what American companies would.

    4. Re:Chinese OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe quite many citizens of the most populous country of the world would...

      (It's China, honey.)

    5. Re:Chinese OS? by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Well you have to install someone's OS. And right now Google is probably the most trustworthy company on the planet.

    6. Re:Chinese OS? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well you have to install someone's OS. And right now Google is probably the most trustworthy company on the planet.

      Ding! I can trust Apple, Microsoft, or Google. Google's offering is based on Linux and much of it is Open Source. The parts that aren't Open Source tell you that they're spying on you, and are optional. Does it, in fact, get any better than this?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Chinese OS? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Which is not saying much.

      Trust Microsoft as far as you can throw fatass Steve Ballmer.

      Trust Google as far as you can throw Larry Page. Slightly longer but not that much of a difference, really.

    8. Re:Chinese OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who in their right mind would install a chinese OS on their device

      Lots of datacenters are doing just this without realising it. I've just finished reading this paper. It talks about the vulnerabilities in IPMI and BMC, the latter being the embedded computer that runs inside every server to provide lights-out management, and has full access to everything happening on the computer. Guess what country provides these embedded computers for all the major server vendors?

    9. Re:Chinese OS? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Maybe in an alternative reality. If so, I'd like to visit there. Hopefully, Customs wouldn't eat my wallet and my ass when I came back.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:Chinese OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? I thought Africa was the most populous country in the world! Errr - maybe Africa is just the most popular? Hey - I'm American, and I suck at geography, alright?

    11. Re:Chinese OS? by mystikkman · · Score: 0

      But if you actually try to make use of that source code, Google puts a spanner in the works.

      http://www.zdnet.com/cn/report-google-stops-acer-from-launching-aliyun-phone-in-china-7000004246/

      Also, forking the SDK is now banned. How is Android open again?

      http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/01/04/1339206/the-android-sdk-is-no-longer-free-software

      Their PR is amazing though, no one in this article even remembers the above and the Google shills are in full force shielding Google and blaming "evil" China.

    12. Re:Chinese OS? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      you could compile the source yourself and compare the binaries i would be more concerned about hardware based back doors when the os and applications are open source

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    13. Re:Chinese OS? by fredprado · · Score: 1

      As I said there is always the bootloader.

    14. Re:Chinese OS? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Also, forking the SDK is now banned. How is Android open again?

      Android is Open Source. Android is not Free Software. Open Source does not mean OSI-approved. Open Source means that you get to see the source, maybe use it internally. Don't let anyone tell you different if they didn't invent the term. They're just trying to obfuscate the situation in order to reflect their self-importance outward; meanwhile, they decrease awareness of the issues around Free Software and why it is meaningfully different from Open Source.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Chinese OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would argue the same against google.... think about it brah. seriously, not trolling. too much.

      google is becoming more and more suspicious in my mind as the days go on...

    16. Re:Chinese OS? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      But if you actually try to make use of that source code, Google puts a spanner in the works.

      Newsflash: You can't have your cake and eat it to.

      If you've made an agreement to work towards making Android the dominant mobile OS, then yeah, creating an incompatible fork is likely to get you kicked out of the OHA. If you've made no such agreement, or no longer want to be a part of the OHA, you'll have no troubles.

      Also, forking the SDK is now banned. How is Android open again?

      It's not. Troll harder please.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    17. Re:Chinese OS? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Android is Open Source. Android is not Free Software. Open Source does not mean OSI-approved.

      Isn't all of the source that is open released under an OSI-approved license?

    18. Re:Chinese OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've made an agreement to work towards making Android the dominant mobile OS, then yeah, creating an incompatible fork is likely to get you kicked out of the OHA.

      That's not what happened, merely *supporting* an incompatible Android fork (like Acer wanted to do with Aliyun) can get you kicked out of the OHA so you dont get preferential treatment. Funny I seem to remember this same behavior from Microsoft when OEMs supported other operating systems, they didnt get preferential treatment.

    19. Re:Chinese OS? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I thought Africa was the most populous country in the world!

      Africa is not a country. It is the most populous continent though.

    20. Re:Chinese OS? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Isn't all of the source that is open released under an OSI-approved license?

      No. Public Domain is Open Source, for example. Or really, any license that lets customers get their hands on the source. Even before I could do any kind of programming (and I do not consider myself to be a programmer just because I've taken a class in asm and can occasionally make a small fix in a C program or similar) I noticed that the shareware and freeware I downloaded sometimes came with source code and sometimes didn't. Further, it would sometimes come with all of the source code, and sometimes just some of the most interesting source code. Open Source is a whole lot more varied than the OSI would have you believe. The oldest formally Open Source software project of any commercial importance of which I am aware is Caldera OpenDOS. I eagerly seek earlier examples.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Chinese OS? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      No.

      From what i've seen it's Apache, GPL or LGPL, are there non-OSI approved ones in there too?

    22. Re:Chinese OS? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      From what i've seen it's Apache, GPL or LGPL, are there non-OSI approved ones in there too?

      From what you've seen where? Stop letting people who didn't invent a term tell you what "Open Source" means. It means access to the source code, period the end. It doesn't tell you anything about the terms. This is why Free Software licenses are important. Open Source is an important component of Free Software, and valuable in its own right, but it is insufficient for protection of the rights of the user, which are protected by effectively using copyright to give the code itself rights.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Chinese OS? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      From what you've seen where?

      In the Android source tree.

      Stop letting people who didn't invent a term tell you what "Open Source" means.

      Who's telling me what open source means?

      It means access to the source code, period the end. It doesn't tell you anything about the terms.

      I know. I also know open source doesn't mean OSI-approved, but that's irrelevant if the licenses are OSI-approved anyway, which AFAIK, they are.

  8. Nice thing about open source by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Is it can be forked. But then we have the question of whether Android, the open source part, is really enough to build a phone or if only basic elements are open source, while key elements are closed or so severely controlled that they might as well be closed.

    Of course the Chinese might be able to fork some of it, and the Apache licensee lets them do this without giving back. But then, given that 50% Android phones pay a tribute to MS, the Chinese government might get into trouble for being a pirate nation, unless of course they pay tribute to MS>

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Nice thing about open source by technomom · · Score: 1

      If ever there was a country where they could do this and run solely off of Google-like substitutes for everything from search to social to calendaring to instant messaging, it's China. The China intranet is amazing in that they've completely replicated Google and they have a population that can sustain it all in one nation. Check out the Ted Talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrcaHGqTqHk

    2. Re:Nice thing about open source by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      Is it can be forked. But then we have the question of whether Android, the open source part, is really enough to build a phone or if only basic elements are open source, while key elements are closed or so severely controlled that they might as well be closed.

      What question? Tons of devices use just the open source part without Google's proprietary stuff. All you have to add are hardware drivers if you're using non-standard hardware, everything else you need comes open source. Only stuff like Google Play and Google Maps are close course.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    3. Re:Nice thing about open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA, you're so funny.
      Do you really think they give a damn about the legality of it? Just take a good look at how their industry is built, they're not paying any licenses, they don't care about any of the laws outside China. Worse than that, they don't care about China's own laws either. The corruption goes so high, even companies like Caterpillar get screwed by them, and nobody even blinks, it's all day-to-day business.

      They don't want a fork, because Google's Android would go at it's pace and the fork itself would be behind, thus prompting the users to stick with Google.

      Democracy is coming to China. Through the great WWW, and they need to control it, but it's too little too late. The next 5-10 years will be damn interesting (from outside China anyway).

    4. Re:Nice thing about open source by mejogid · · Score: 1

      Patent infringement is not the same as pirating/copyright infringement. Furthermore, the criteria for patent recognition - and indeed whether they recognise patents at all - is entirely up to the state in which said technology is being used: many countries have independent patent offices with their own criteria, which typically require individual filing to be recognised. China is quite at liberty not to recognise MS software patents and thus not pay any royalties; indeed, there are many who think that software patents are unnecessary so long as copyright/reverse engineering is prohibited and would welcome such a stance.

    5. Re:Nice thing about open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democracy is coming to China.

      And it's leaving the West. Makes you wonder whether there is only a finite supply of it, and it just migrates around.

    6. Re:Nice thing about open source by bdwebb · · Score: 1

      But then, given that 50% Android phones pay a tribute to MS, the Chinese government might get into trouble for being a pirate nation, unless of course they pay tribute to MS>

      HAhahahahahahahahaha. The Chinese government might get in trouble for being a pirate nation? All they have to do is claim that they aren't involved in the government funded cloning of the technology as they currently do. In China, claims are enough...it's not like they will allow MS to come and inspect their development or their funding process. They will simply tell MS "Oh, we agree...there are just so many cloners out there that we don't know what to do!" MS will retort "You need to help us shut down these illegal cloning facilities and businesses immediately" to which China replies "Of COUUUURRRSE. We'll get RIGHT ON THAT."

      The Chinese government doesn't really get in trouble anymore...they are quite efficient at deferring the risk and penalties to private entities and there is no way to enforce any oversight so MS can pretty much eat a middle finger.

    7. Re:Nice thing about open source by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Is it can be forked. But then we have the question of whether Android, the open source part, is really enough to build a phone or if only basic elements are open source, while key elements are closed or so severely controlled that they might as well be closed.

      Is it even a question any more? I thought Cyanogen had answered that particular one years ago. The only thing the opensource Android codebase lacks is device-specific drivers, and that's going to be a perennial problem with Open Source until hardware manufacturers open up their devices. It's still an issue even with Linux - which is why most Linux machines that care about graphic performance install a close-source binary blob driver from the manufacturer.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  9. Daylight Savings Time Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it time for another poll about how much we want to pretend we hate daylight savings time?

  10. Gotta watch out for those cheap Chinese knock-offs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And create your own cheap knockoff?

    Yep!

    What the Chinese will do is get the source code to Android, use a substandard Chinese version of Java and give theirs away for much less than what Google is giving their version of Android away for!

    Just wait! We'll see a Chinese version of GNU soon using a sub standard environmentally unfriendly version of 'C' to code their versions!

  11. Uh, what? by Daetrin · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are already a number of Android forks in China, including one by the Chinese search giant Baidu, who has also replaced Google as the default search engine in most of the Android phones there.

    cf. "Android is failing by succeeding in China"

    The Google "control" of Android doesn't seem to be doing much to deter Chinese companies.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up. Exactly right. Cannot believe this is a story.

  12. Open Handset Alliance by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not entirely true. Google initially created Android and released it as open source. But Android today is governed by the Open Handset Alliance. Several companies (including hardware ones) have a say in Android development, not just Google.

    http://www.openhandsetalliance.com/android_overview.html

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Open Handset Alliance by mystikkman · · Score: 1

      Haha, the same alliance with secret agreements that banned Acer from making Aliyun phones?

      http://www.zdnet.com/cn/report-google-stops-acer-from-launching-aliyun-phone-in-china-7000004246/

      http://marketingland.com/google-acer-android-aliyun-21631

      How "Open" is the Open Handset Alliance? Not so much. Great branding and PR by Google though.

    2. Re:Open Handset Alliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      OHA did the right thing. Essentially, Acer/Aliyun was banned because THEY were anti-openness. Acer/Aliyun wanted to go with a proprietary format where their system could run both Aliyun and Android apps, but Android systems could not run Aliyun apps. It intended to break the ecosystem, not maliciously, but it was still threatened to fragment the community and make global application access less open.

    3. Re:Open Handset Alliance by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Haha, the same alliance with secret agreements

      Ooh! Secret agreements! I love me a good conspiracy.

      that banned Acer from making Aliyun phones?

      Yeah, they threatened to kick out people who worked directly against the purpose of the alliance. How unreasonable of them. Next you'll suggest that democrats who suggest adopting Randian economic practices are getting unjustly booted from the party.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  13. No problem with Apple then? by Drethon · · Score: 1

    Just curious...

    1. Re:No problem with Apple then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no problem with Apple... of course, this is because they aren't in China's sights (in this article).

      So, QED: Apple == UDFy-38135539 for this story.

      Along with politically motivated junkies, I grow tired of fanbois who try to inject X into non-X material /me shrugs.

  14. Meta: pretentiousness in the title by blind+biker · · Score: 2

    If you want to look smart and use a rarely encountered word such as "askance", you should at least remember not to capitalize a preposition.

    I like fine vocabulary just like any other intellectual, but pretense bothers me - a lot.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Meta: pretentiousness in the title by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      yes could we not have a Bayesian filter so that these articles written in tabloid-ease "looks askance, frowns upon etc" don't get onto the front page - if your a professional you are supposed to trade up to a "proper" broadsheet paper tacky titles devalue the site.

  15. Corporations are much harder than dissidents. by concealment · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A bullet to the base of the skull won't do it.

    Most likely, China just wants control of the OS used on phones within its Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere.

  16. Bull$hit! I don't buy it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How come China is now complaining about Android dominance and they are using window$ without any complaints even if it's dominating on another platform?

    This doesn't make any sens. Looks like somebody is trying to get attention at themselves here and it's probably heavily influence by a Google competitor that is irrelevant in mobile OS today. Yeah you know who you are M$.

  17. Re:Barely Legal Teen here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While slightly trollish he does make a good point(posting ac due to mod points on other parts of the article.

  18. I had to loook it up... by ArcadeNut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Definition of ASKANCE

    1: with a side-glance : obliquely

    2: with disapproval or distrust : scornfully

    Guess that's the word of the day...

    --
    Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
  19. A valid concern from their end. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is in China's best interest to be developing and running their own operating systems. It's not just a matter of national security, though that does play a role. It also means they have intelligent and experienced people of their own to contribute to the global market as true peers.

    Piracy works, but it always leaves you a step behind. It does nothing to earn respect, either.

  20. Re:Bull$hit! I don't buy it! by PPH · · Score: 2

    How come China is now complaining about Android dominance and they are using window$ without any complaints

    Because China knows they have Microsoft by the ball$. All they have to do is threaten to move a small part of their operations over to Linux and maybe close Microsoft's Beijing R&D office and Microsoft will give them the keys to the kingdom.

    I'm guessing that what China really wants is the ability to put back doors and kill switches into communications platforms used there. Microsoft (and other businesses, like RIM) will do that For A Few Dollars More.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  21. Also, Amazon by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    And since it doesn't seem like it's been mentioned yet, Google can't even stop Amazon, another American company that has to follow all the US rules on copyright and patents, from making their own incredibly successful fork of Android and cutting Google out of the revenue stream entirely. Why does China, who generally takes a "look the other way" attitude even when actual copyright and patent issues are involved, feel like they need to be concerned in this case?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  22. New Criticism of Google: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not evil enough!

  23. Chinks love Microsoft, hate Google by benjfowler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Explanation. Microsoft are disloyal, money grubbing sellout who would give those Communists a long, leisurely blowjob if they thought they could make a few bucks out of it. No doubt Microsoft are happy to do anything to keep the Chinese happy.

    Google have higher standards, and to their credit, have told the commies to fuck off in the past.

    This is why the dictators are all whiny and butthurt now. Because Google won't let them have their own way and oppress China and the world.

    1. Re:Chinks love Microsoft, hate Google by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      First off, they are NOT chinks. You are disgusting.

      Secondly, you ARE right that they love Bill Gates. But that is because he has shared their source code with them, and is now willing to move a bunch of Western technology to CHina in exchange for his getting money. Pretty Sad. I am just thankful that Gates was not involved in our defense industry.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Chinks love Microsoft, hate Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gate's buggy OS is the main reason the Chinese have been able to vacuum up and out defense and commercial information from everywhere.

      When our government prohibits the use of Windows on any secure network and for every secure application, we will know they are serious about security.

    3. Re:Chinks love Microsoft, hate Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinc or Chink = CHINese-C/Kommunist
      A Korean war term to differientiate between North Korean and their allied Chinese Communist trops, as opposed to Chinese Nationalists in exile on Taiwan since 1949.
      It was never clear how Chinc became considered a racist slur when it only applies to Communists who are also Chinese, it would be incorrect and an insult to a citizen of the ROC/Taiwan or a member of the large Chinese diaspora unless of course they were somehow members of the Chinese Communist Party. The contraction the poster above used would be correct as mainland China is still officialy Communist.
      While it is perhaps an insulting term it is aimed at a national and political affiliation, the Chinese Communist Party and people and things in the PRC not a race of people. We are under no obligation to like the Peoples Republic of China any more than we must love and respect the United States and the people and organizations resident there.

  24. Need a user-oriented Debian fork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trouble with the Google/OHA codebase is that it evolves to suit Google and OHA requirements, which are not well aligned with user requirements. For example, there is little to no privacy protection in Android, it's a marketer's delight.

    A user-oriented organization like Debian would be a far better guardian of user needs and freedoms than the OHA companies. It's tempting to get a fork along those lines started.

    1. Re:Need a user-oriented Debian fork by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Google paid for the development of Android and then released it as open source. They try to make that money back through licenses and mobile search ads.

      If you don't like it, then you're free to install a forked ROM that caters to your privacy needs, because Google released it as open source and even encourages Android fork development. And they'll be happy to sell you hardware without a locked bootloader, making it even easier to do this.

      Google wants to make money, but they're giving you the tools and freedom to do what you want.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  25. They are right by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    That is also why America needs to stop our reliance on China as well. It is high time for us to stop their dumping, subsidies, and money fixing, or using any of their parts/equipment in our gear.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:They are right by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that. Do you have any idea how hard it is to buy something as simple as a bolt that isn't made in China?

      --
      -
    2. Re:They are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is also why America needs to stop our reliance on China as well. It is high time for us to stop their dumping, subsidies, and money fixing, or using any of their parts/equipment in our gear.

      says the hypocrite bitching from a computer with 50% Chinese parts.

    3. Re:They are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shows what you know I'm using an original US made Commodore 64 to surf this site, because I can :P

    4. Re:They are right by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      It is high time for us to stop their dumping, subsidies, and money fixing

      I initially read that as "dumpling subsidies", and was ready to shoot of a fiery reply. I loves me some cheap dumplings.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    5. Re:They are right by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, I DO have an idea. I am working on doing JUST THAT. And it is hard. BUT, I am also finding out that US prices for screws is actually CHEAPER than what I would get from the CHinese. The issue is the retailers are just going along.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:They are right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Windbourne, I heard you are performing CHEAPER homosexual blowjobs at a fraction of the fees charged by the orientals.

  26. Re:Bull$hit! I don't buy it! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Bill gates and his companies work closely with China and give up all of their technology to them.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  27. They tried and Google banned them by mystikkman · · Score: 1
    1. Re:They tried and Google banned them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whole bunch of conjecture in those top two articles: reportedly, presumably, etc. Regardless, presuming that all of the assumptions are factual, Google did nothing that implies Android is anything but open; Acer was completely free to release its phone with the forked OS, albeit at the cost of losing valuable third-party deals via its partnership with Google. This is how capitalism works anywhere in the world -- it has no bearing on the "openness" of the Android OS.

    2. Re:They tried and Google banned them by mystikkman · · Score: 1

      ; Acer was completely free to release its phone with the forked OS, albeit at the cost of losing valuable third-party deals via its partnership with Google. This is how capitalism works anywhere in the world -- it has no bearing on the "openness" of the Android OS.

      Oh, so you mean just like the OEMs were free to bundle Netscape or dual boot BeOS, except that their Windows license cost went up a bit? Right?

    3. Re:They tried and Google banned them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought Slashdot nerds were joking/being paranoid when they said there were Microsoft shills around here, but after looking at your comment history, I'm convinced they were right.

    4. Re:They tried and Google banned them by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Yes, lets just pick on the two or three people on here that don't conform to the groupthink echochamber and chase them away calling them shills.

      --
      This space for rent.
    5. Re:They tried and Google banned them by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      BeOS was forked to Haiku perfectly fine because it was never owned by Microsoft.

      I don't see Google shutting down Kindle or Nook that use Android, but are not part of the handset alliance.

      Most phone OEMS are members of Google's Android Alliance, as part of that Google works with them for updates, and they promise to keep their Android versions "on the straight and narrow path" for maximum software compatibility. Those are the only times Google throws a fit, when somebody IN the alliance breaks something to get ahead of other OEMS.

    6. Re:They tried and Google banned them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, actually, just like that. Monopolization is a part of capitalism -- the end goal, in fact, if you're playing to win. We in the States have decided that we don't like monopolies, though, and have passed and occasionally enforce laws that make their inception and operation more difficult. What we have in the States is not defining example of capitalism... so what was your point, exactly?

      To be clear, I'm not saying that it's good or even right, but it has no bearing on whether Android is an open OS. To argue otherwise is akin to implying that dogs pant because purple -- it makes no fucking sense.

    7. Re:They tried and Google banned them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see Google shutting down Kindle or Nook that use Android, but are not part of the handset alliance.

      Because they can't be part of the OHA, Google's stance is "if you ship forked Android distros you don't get preferential treatment", funny how Microsoft did a similar thing with Windows and everybody gets up in arms about it. OEMs are as free to ship Windows 8 on non SecureBoot hardware as they are to ship forked Android distros, just don't expect preferential treatment from the vendor.

    8. Re:They tried and Google banned them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not allowed to have a point of view that aligns with Microsoft! If you post on this website your opinion should be the same as everybody else's because we cannot have rational discussion taking place here, if you refuse I'm afraid we will have to call you a shill.......because you know, that's how we end an argument we're not winning.

  28. Re:Gotta watch out for those cheap Chinese knock-o by SilentStaid · · Score: 2

    Yeah!! What's not to love about a mobile OS that has all the security of the Chinese State Department? On the bright side, every back door to the system will be built there intentionally so you'll know exactly where they all are.

  29. $50 tablet or unlocked smartPhone says so by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Most of my kitchen appliances and electronics are Chinese now. Whos what they are doing when i am sleeping? :-)

  30. China just isn't a team player by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

    Remember the expression: "Don't bite the hand that feeds you" ? Well it's exactly what China continues to do. China offers hardware and we buy it and continue to do so. On the other hand, we make intellectual products and they copy them so they don't have to buy them from us. I wish we could automate more of our manufacturing so we can reduce on dependance on China and make them realise that it's a two way affair, not one way.

  31. Its not about Linux ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    'Although the Android system currently remains open source, the core technologies and technology roadmap is strictly controlled by Google.'

    Isn't the core technology actually the kernel, and strictly controlled by Linus Torvalds?

    No, "core" is being used in the context of the user experience. In this context Linux is not a core technology of Android. Its just the kernel underneath that very few interact with directly. It could be replaced and few apps or users would notice or care.

    The core technologies being referred to are search, cloud services and storage, factory installed apps (ex maps), etc. Maybe the store, purchases.

  32. So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..they should just steal it and make their own crappy version like they always do. They don't have anything that they haven't stolen the original idea from the US to start with! I mean we did pioneer just about everything technology related that most of these devices are based off of including the Android OS.

  33. as opposed to... by MrKaos · · Score: 1
    The PLA, who have shown soooo much moooore integrity.

    gimmie google any day over that.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  34. Justification for Another Massive Investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the usual way the Chinese government works, this could be the particular ministry justifying another massive government investment project.

    The end result could be a multi-million $ new mobile OS developed tagged something like "Red Dragon" OS which is just a fork of Android. The bureaucracy of course gets ample opportunity to swindle money from the project.

  35. Re:Bull$hit! I don't buy it! by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    re: I'm guessing that what China really wants is the ability to put back doors and kill switches into communications platforms used there. Microsoft...
    .
    That seems like the most likely answer. China would definitely want central control and a centrally throwable kill switch. But China would also have to worry that some TLA from the USA might convince MS to introduce a few extra features into the mix. China would be better off building its own mash-up OS, preferably one from open source so that they could look at all of the code when they compile the final package.
    .
    So ironic for an iron-fisted government to have to cradle the soft-warm-fuzzy underbelly of open-sourcery in order to get what it needs. Otherwise, they have to worry about Stuxnet like trojans or other hidden gateways and messengers.