Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Put Numbers On China's Microblog Censorship

eldavojohn writes "One of China's main microblogging services used by 30% of all Chinese internet users is called Sina Weibo (weibo is the Chinese word for 'microblog') and something that is quite different from the West's twitter is, of course, the enforced censorship. Researchers at Rice University in Houston have estimated numbers for how censorship works and identifies the 'velocity of censorship' in China's microblogging censorship. Most of the posts are marked as 'permission denied' between the five minute and ten minute marks after posting. Their research shows that 'If an average censor can scan around 50 posts a minute, that would require some 1400 censors at any instant to handle the 70,000 posts pouring in. And if they work 8 hour shifts, that's a total of 4200 censors on the payroll each day.' The research indicates you would need a small army to meet stringent censorship policies when servicing China and to avoid being shutdown like Fanfou (another weibo). Keep in mind that this is not simply identifying keywords and blocking the post based on those words. The researchers noted that a phrase like 'Secretary of the Political and Legislative Committee' will result in you being unable to submit your post to Sina Weibo. So the research examines the speed of ex post facto censorship which presumably requires an employee or perhaps government employee to identify 'non-harmonious' posts based on their intrinsic content."

7 of 58 comments (clear)

  1. This quote seems appropriate. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. --CS Lewis

    This seems appropriate to the situation, as a good many in that culture genuinely believe that the censorship performed is not only necessary, but beneficial to their society.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  2. Re:Only one question remains. by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is with the constant America and Europe are evil scumbag overlords crap on slashdot? Come down off it you paranoid moron. The US censors like 1 thing and you go all Glen Beck and compare them to China as if it's the same caliber. Yeah, the US's free speech availability is the exact same as China. You're right. Ugh, keep dreaming, idiot.

  3. By All Means Explain This Revolutionary Technology by eldavojohn · · Score: 2
    Hey, thanks for calling me an "old-school folk" but I'll have you know that I have studied artificial intelligence both academically and professionally and -- always amusing -- is the delta between how far along people think we are with AI and where we really are with AI. I mean, people are talking like all you have to do is show Watson a problem set and then solutions abound! Your assertion that it's just "a couple spaces" thrown into the mix that's stopping us is laughably outdated. For example: Applying a negative modifier to a positive statement can occur in so many ways, I couldn't even list them all right here right now. And we're just supposed to automatically code for that?

    Seriously, there seems to be a great oversight among certain old-school folks that computers can do this kind of mass searching in support of oppression perfectly fine.

    That's why it takes five to ten minutes? Yeah? I don't know what sort of improvements you've made on top of latent semantic analysis or if you've completely scrapped that and revolutionized natural language parsing but, by all means, publish your work so the rest of us can bask in your divine glory. A job at Google should be the least of your goals -- usurping Google as an advertising giant would flow naturally from being able to automatically "understand" with a high recall and accuracy rate what people are writing in microblogs.

    The argument that "it would take a huge army of men to do all that surveillance" does not hold water anymore.

    It's funny you should use the phrase "hold water" when discussing how viable a large army of mindless internet users would be.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  4. Re:I'm guessing it works like this by arielCo · · Score: 2

    This. I've seen the moderation triggers implemented in a Spanish-speaking forum but you could work around it with misspellings and leetspeak. I'm not familiar with Chinese but there may be less ways to put a concept in ideograms furtively, perhaps with homophones, and those can be covered too.

    Maybe with pictures, Instagram-like?

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  5. Lenny Bruce by Sporkinum · · Score: 2

    Lenny Bruce
    “If you can't say "Fuck" you can't say, "Fuck the government.”

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  6. Difference between US and China by mbone · · Score: 2

    (Besides the obvious political ones.)

    In the US, this would be viewed as something requiring A.I. research. In China, another 5,000 or even 10,000 people get an "iron rice-bowl."
    Foxcon could handle this with their staff on break.

  7. Re:Slashdot is just as bad as China by rgbrenner · · Score: 2

    slashdot does not delete comments. Click on the "Load all comments" button, and move the slider to -1... all the crap is still there.