The Manti Te'o of Physics
theodp writes "When it comes to tales of fake girlfriends, Manti Te'o can't hold a candle to theoretical particle physicist Paul Frampton. In November 2011, writes the NY Times' Maxine Swann in 'The Professor, the Bikini Model and the Suitcase Full of Trouble,' Frampton met who he says he thought was Czech bikini model Denise Milani on Mate1.com. A Yahoo Messenger romance bloomed, at least in the 68-year-old Frampton's mind (Frampton's ex-wife was a self-described 'physics groupie'). But before starting their perfect life together, fake Denise asked Frampton for one little favor — would he be so kind as to bring her a bag that she had left in La Paz, Bolivia? Yep, bad idea. The UNC Louis D. Rubin, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Physics and Astronomy soon found himself in a Buenos Aries prison, charged with transporting two kilos of cocaine into Argentina. Currently serving a four years and eight months sentence under house arrest, Frampton reportedly continues to supervise his two current PhD students by phone, and still finds time to post to the Physics archive."
let the personal Indictments on evidence presented by media coverage begin .... now!
(You may write below. Judging morals and boob-based motivational jokes are encouraged.)
Sent from my ENIAC
It's hard to believe that he could really be that oblivious to how the real world works. The messages he sent from Bolivia where he talks about the value of cocaine, and evading authorities, don't help his case, either.
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
Do you, you... Feel like I do?
Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
... in rock (outside of disco) ...
You have no credibility
Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Nowak
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_reiser
Are a couple of examples that spring to mind.
Being very smart, especially if you're somewhat sheltered from the real world can lead to really, really bad decisions.
Clearly here is one guy who lacks the sense of curiosity that is supposed to be the hallmark of all physicists. What is in the bag? Is the cat in the bag alive or dead?
--
This comment will not be saved until you click the Submit button below.
I did not meet Frampton but In the 80's I knew several of his students. So that's 2 degrees.
All I can say is wow.
This guy not only was a professor, he was one of the guys inventing the thing that eventually became String Theory only at the time it was called Dual Resonance Models. He also wrote a book on QFT that was generally on everyone's suggested reading list. Virtual every high energy physicist has heard of him.
What exactly are those repercussions, that don't arise only as a consequence of legal status? Here's a hint, they're about the same as those of people taking high doses of other opiates prescribed by physicians; and those under heroin maintenance programs in Europe: virtually nil.
Pick another drug to make that comment about, because medically speaking, opiates (which includes heroin) are among the safest drugs out there when used legally.
And before you bring up 'liver problems', remember that is a consequence of the Tylenol put into opioid preparations as a deterrent to recreational use.
And as a sanity check, I have to assume you believe the taxpayer should not be responsible for the repercussions of legal alcohol and tobacco use? Because if that's not the case, well, you know what that would make you. Oh and by the way, the burden on taxpayers will be less if it's legal regardless of the drug. The drug war sure as shit isn't free, and the non-drugwar costs are already there- and there's no good reason to believe untold masses of people are going to rush out and become heroin addicts just because it's legal.
One could argue lots of other things too.
People should be free to fuck themselves up with drugs, just like they're free to fuck themselves up with other things. Why should drugs be special?
People fuck themselves up with alcohol (OK it is a drug), but many more people can use it responsibly and legally.
People are free to drive as much as they want even though it is a huge cause of injury, disablement and death. Yet we support them.
Likewise people are free to do many dangerous recreational activities (mountain biking, snowsports, whitewater rafting etc).
People are also free to eat themselves into a 450lb food coma.
Why should drugs be any different?
Why do they get singled out aginst the no-harm (if you do no harm to others, then it sould be allowed) principle? Many things currently illegal are harmless if used responsibly, and many legal things are harmful if not. The key is pursuing the people whi cannot use them responsibly. And a large part of why drugs cause so much harm is the massive association with crime BECAUSE they are illegal. If they were legal, they wouldn't be de-facto associated with crime.
I have yet to hear a good, coherent argument as to why drugs should be illegal compared to other dangerous recreational activities.
SJW n. One who posts facts.
We are. But I still feel like a newbie.
I have a long and personally relevant story about how an otherwise reasonably intelligent man can allow himself to be fooled by a younger attractive woman. I'll outline it here.
He gave in to the temptation to see escorts. He met one who he started seeing regularly, and after a while she told him she was getting out of the business but would keep seeing him. By seeing her more regularly, she could get by, financially. When asked she hinted that she might be interested in a relationship, but wanted to get her life sorted out - that she wasn't "ready". She was trying to start a legitimate business first, and wanted to focus on that.
Two years go by. He keeps seeing her. He puts some money towards her business, even some technical assistance. She meets him outside of "work" but only when she wants a favour. They chat online almost every day, and he sees her for the other stuff every couple of weeks. There has been no progress towards a relationship, and he suspects she has a partner who is actually running the (legitimate) business, or is still working, or both.
Despite all this, he still holds out hope. He's aware of the cognitive dissonance, and the doublethink required to stick with it, and has even asked her to just tell him, so they can carry on happily as they are without that false hope. He'd accept that. Despite it all, he genuinely likes and cares for her.
Luckily this post is buried in a reply several deep in an older thread, so I doubt many people will read it and raise eyebrows at the obvious "a friend of mine..." nature of the story.
Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
He knew damn well what was in the bag! After being warned by a friend that it probably had drugs sewn into the lining, he opened it up and (supposedly) decided it was empty. Then he filled it with his own clothes to make it look less suspicious. Kinda hard to miss 2Kg of coke, isn't it? This is a guy that was so delusional he actually thought if he smuggled coke for this Milani chick, that she was going to fall in love with him and marry him... despite the fact that he had never spoken to her in person.
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.