Slashdot Mirror


Apple Faces Lawsuit For Retina MacBook Pro 'Ghosting' Issue

redletterdave writes "Apple is facing a potential class action suit in San Francisco's California Northern District Court after an owner of its MacBook Pro with Retina display accused the computer company on Wednesday of 'tricking' consumers into paying for a poor-quality screen, citing an increasingly common problem that causes images to be burned into the display, also known as 'image persistence' or 'ghosting.' The lawsuit claims only LG-made screens are affected by this problem, but 'none of Apple's advertisements or representations disclose that it produces display screens that exhibit different levels of performance and quality.' Even though only one man filed the lawsuit, it can become a class action suit if others decide to join him in his claim, which might not be an issue: An Apple.com support thread for this particular problem, entitled 'MacBook Pro Retina display burn-in,' currently has more than 7,200 replies and 367,000 views across more than 500 pages."

19 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. They should sue LG instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    LG was the manufacturer of the defective screen

    They should sue LG instead of Apple

    I am no apple fanbois, it's just that if the defective part came from LG, why not home in to the manufacturer, instead of the seller?

    1. Re:They should sue LG instead by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LG was the manufacturer of the defective screen

      They should sue LG instead of Apple

      I am no apple fanbois, it's just that if the defective part came from LG, why not home in to the manufacturer, instead of the seller?

      Not to take sides, but I think the answer is, because it's not the buyer's job to solve problems in the seller's supply chain.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:They should sue LG instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even more specifically, the plaintiff has no purchase relationship with LG, and therefore no standing to file suit. He purchased the Macbook from Apple, so he does have standing to sue Apple. Apple can then pass the costs of the lawsuit, by suing LG.

    3. Re:They should sue LG instead by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, I default to believing that class action lawsuits are frivolous.

      Enh.... I will go so far as to posit that many (perhaps most) class action lawsuits are frivolous. They seldom serve the consumer (that jeans lawsuit netted me 67 cents. yippie.) but sometimes serve to make ignoring real problems costly for the vendor, which I believe is a good thing.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:They should sue LG instead by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Informative

      What really cuts down on legal costs is having millions of potential plaintiffs who each, for the ~$50 of damage done to them, are not willing to go through the bother of even small-claims court (except for a tiny number, who can be paid off a couple hundred bucks on an individual basis). Can you cite any examples of companies being swamped by "thousands" of individual lawsuits over small-cash issues? --- because in the real world, that never actually happens. On the other hand, class actions frequently allow a too-small-for-individuals-to-bother case to get serious, top-notch legal representation, and take a big chunk of cash from the company (as they deserve for mass-screwing-over their customers). This is why all the big pro-corporate-interests media/political loudmouths (aside from the small fraction of them working for law firms) shout so much about "tort reform!" and try to push through legislation *weakening* class action abilities --- megacorporations overwhelmingly prefer to keep their I'm-bigger-than-you legal advantage over private individuals.

    5. Re:They should sue LG instead by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple is 100% responsible for the end product. If there is a bad part, they should recall all of the affected products and fix it. If the problem was due to a faulty part and not assembly or design, then they should collect that from the part supplier. The consumer is never responsible for identifying the specific fault within a product then suing the manufacturer of the affected part.

  2. Mildly annoying by addie · · Score: 4, Informative

    I bought the retina MacBook right after it was released (I'm using it right now) and it's the best computer purchase I've ever made - flame all you want, but I had the money, and it suits my needs.

    I definitely have the screen ghosting problem, and noticed it relatively early, specifically when switching to the widget dashboard which has a dark grey background. However it has never, ever interfered with my work or entertainment. I'd call it a mild annoyance at worst.

    If this guy wants to sue, then power to him. I suppose he's standing on principle. But I'll pick more serious issues in my life to worry about.

    1. Re:Mildly annoying by twilight30 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have one as well, and the original screen was an LG (purchased a week after they launched the computer, but not delivered for another month). I heard about this defect in the above-mentioned thread about two weeks after launch, but didn't notice anything for about 6 weeks after receiving it. Then the trouble started.

      Exchanged for another screen - except it was another LG. Which promptly developed image retention after two weeks. This time, Apple Store 'geniuses' made out with a bullshit test that it was 'normal' and 'expected' - to which I pointed out that the Samsung equivalents had no such 'normal' ghosting at all.

      Fought with the fuckers for 3 weeks. Finally, I had to threaten to return it for a full refund off my credit card when they finally gave in. I kept pointing out that a laptop costing over $3k Cdn has no business exhibiting such behaviour, and that otherwise I actually was very happy with the computer besides this one issue. They finally replaced it with a Samsung-manufactured screen - and this was back in September; totally flawless screen since the final replacement.

      The clincher? You just have to ask them if they would be happy with an expensive machine that showed this shitty display themselves.

      The computer itself is really a dream to use now. And yes, it's the best purchase I've ever made as well. Despite all the bullshit to get there.

      --
      ========================================
      Death will come, and will have your eyes
      -- Pavese
  3. Meanwhile, on Infinite Loop... by Java+Commando · · Score: 5, Funny

    “Oh snap-- Looks like our alternate panel supplier is a bust! Now what?!”

    “Let’s submit another lawsuit against the guys who build the good panels!”

    “Good idea!”

  4. Re:Burn in is NOT Ghosting by addie · · Score: 4, Informative

    From someone who owns and uses a MacBook retina daily, I can confirm that it is definitely not image burn. The ghosting happens when switching between bright white and dark grey backgrounds, and fades over the course of 10-20 seconds. It's noticeable, but only barely.

  5. I bet he'd say... by verbatim · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You're not looking at it right."

          - steve

    --
    Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
  6. LG Specific issue? by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have an older LG brand 24 inch monitor, I fell asleep with Dragonball Z paused, and Goku's hair outline burned in...

    Now it's just a huge dark smudge in the middle of the screen, and it's relegated to the 'laundry room computer'.

    It's my understanding that it's caused by overvoltage applied to force faster response times. That is, if it takes 10 milliseconds to switch a pixel from 0 to 1, you can max out the pixel (black to white transition) in 5 milliseconds by forcing double the normal 1 voltage down the line. allowing them to advertize faster response times (advertized response time is why I bought that model...) at the cost of product wear that won't accumulate until after the normal warranty expires. The brighter pixels literally burn out, not burn in.

  7. Apple products are a lottery now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple products are *all* a lottery now.

    It has been this way for several years. The only thing unaffected by their use of multiple part sources is the systems without displays (Mac Pro and Mac Mini).

    When I bought an iPhone 4S, I returned it four times. The first two units had a horrible yellow tint to the display, the third was blueish, and the forth was slightly green. The fifth unit was blueish as the third, but less so- most people wouldn't notice it so I decided I simply didn't care at the time.

    When I bought an iPad 2, there was horrible backlight bleed on the first two units. The third had a yellow tint (yet again), and the forth was once more slightly blue-shifted, but since the backlight had no bleeding or strange artifacts I decided to keep that one too.

    Then I bought a Retina MBP... Same thing. Returned the laptop four times. The first four units ALL had LG panels and exhibited the ghosting issue. It wasn't permanent- it faded after time, but that time span was often some multiple of 10 minutes. You could "burn in" that display just by looking at the same thing for 5 minutes, then it'd take many more minutes for the effect to fade away. The only other time I have ever encountered this issue in the history of computing was when I left something on a Viewsonic LCD (a VX924 if I'm not mistaken) for more then 24 hours without a screensaver. That display had some crazy burn-in when I closed the simulator program (from the static UI elements), but it faded away afterwards.

    Frankly, I'm tired of this crap.

    I used to buy Apple because I'd get a top-spec product that was flawless OOTB. I had no problems paying for a premium because stuff "just worked". Well, that's no longer the case in both situations. Products OOTB are a total lottery, be prepared to return it many many times to get a "pristine" product (I wouldn't care as much if they didn't charge an arm and a leg for this stuff and market it the way they do). OS X no longer "just works", but "kinda works". There's a lot of broken stuff in the core, and even more half-baked and ill-concieved features bolted on top.

    So I'll be voting with my wallet from now on. My next laptop will be a Lenovo. My next tower will likely be an HP, Lenovo, or Dell workstation. My next phone will probably still be an iPhone since the iOS app store is a huge chunk of my monthly income, and I'm sure I'll need a Mini to target iOS through Xcode.

    Otherwise, fuck Apple.

    I'm so sick and tired of their "we are perfect and we offer the best experience out there!" bullshit. This is no longer true and they are going to get fucking wasted in the market unless they get their shit together and start offering the same level of quality and commitment to ALL their products (not just the iOS crap) as they used to before the iPhone. I'm hoping they get hammered in court because they deserve it for these shenanigans. If you're going to sell one MBP with the same SKU as another, it better have the same damned parts or equivalent in performance.

  8. Not sure it's the panel. by Jason+Pollock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've noticed this burn-in. However, I've noticed something else about it that makes me believe that it is not necessarily the panel itself. I've been playing World of Warcraft in a window, and when I move the window, the ghost moves with it - it maintains it's position relative to the top of the window, not the top of the screen. This would indicate to me that it isn't the display which is ghosting, but something further up the rendering chain.

  9. Re:Burn in is NOT Ghosting by Tr3vin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ghosting is often used to described the blur caused by pixels slowly transitioning from one state to the next. What is happening here is more along the lines of "image retention" than ghosting. A static charge can "preserve" the state of the pixels in some of the cheaper IPS panels. It isn't permanent like burn in but it is annoying and a much slower transition than the typical ghosting. It is funny that it has taken this long for the issue to gain attention. I'd seen the very same issues with their cinema displays a few years ago. Never understood how artists could swear by Apple if the colors don't transition correctly.

  10. I had an LG screen, replaced with Samsung by Falc0n · · Score: 5, Informative

    As soon as I received my MBPr I started testing to see if it had ghosting issues and if it was an LG screen. Sure enough, both were true. I returned it, and referenced the specific part number 661-7171 (that was the samsung screen) to replace it with. My local apple rep obliged and I had a nice new Samsung screen. Re-ran the stress test and it cleared.

    That was 6 months ago, haven't seen a ghosting issue since.

  11. They should get their displays from Samsung by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They should get their displays from Samsung. Oh wait, they can't, they burned that bridge.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:They should get their displays from Samsung by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  12. Re:CRT Burn in is now LCD Retina Glacouma by macs4all · · Score: 4, Informative

    It comes with several; however, even though I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Apple user, and have been since 1976, I have also been an embedded designer for over 3 decades. And as such, I think I can safely say that this is a clear case of a vendor (LG) that never should have been approved as an alternate source. Apple has been replacing the panels/machines of anyone who complains. The problem is that the Samsung panels that Apple can use don't have as high of a contrast ratio, and a slightly warmer white-point; so some consumers are unhappy with that, too... Fortunately, it seems like the fear of losing the business to another "glass" supplier (like Sharp), has made LG fix the issue. So, if you buy a rMBP NOW, it likely won't have the issue.