Slashdot Mirror


Porn Troll Panics, Dismisses Pending Lawsuits

JayRott writes "According to Ars, 'The embattled copyright trolling firm Prenda Law is seeking to contain the fallout from a looming identity theft scandal by voluntarily dismissing lawsuits filed by the shell company AF Holdings. A Minnesota man named Alan Cooper has charged that Prenda fraudulantly used his name as the CEO of AF Holdings, allegations that have attracted the attention of a California judge. Ken at the legal blog Popehat broke the news that Prenda attorney Paul Duffy has sought dismissal of at least four pending infringement cases involving the Prenda-linked shell company AF Holdings. All four dismissals occurred in the Northern District of Illinois.' I don't see how Prenda thinks this is going to make one lick of difference to an already angry Judge."

15 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. Too late to run and hide now by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this is akin to getting caught stealing money from the tip jar and trying to make it look like you were just "making change".

    Too late, you woke the dragon.

    1. Re:Too late to run and hide now by tqk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've been watching this story unfold at Techdirt.com. It's the most farcical slow motion train wreck I've seen in quite a while. It speaks volumes about USA's litigious culture, the Imaginary Property regime, and the miniscule amount of value added to an individual through managing to graduate from law school and be accepted to practice law. To think that these guys spent tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars for their educations, and this is what the idiots end up doing with them. Astonishing.

      Kudos to the judge. I've seen a few posts from guys wishing they could have a womb implanted so they could have his children.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:Too late to run and hide now by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lawyers are a protected privileged class in the USA. Everyone from the President to members of Congress to Supreme Court justices are all lawyers. If you were to shoot all lawyers, you would no longer have a United States.

      (what you'd have is a nice place to live)

    3. Re:Too late to run and hide now by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lawyers are a protected privileged class in the USA. Everyone from the President to members of Congress to Supreme Court justices are all lawyers.

      Well, kinda. They're not practicing lawyers. They've evolved into LAWYER's next form, POLITICIAN. As lawyers they learn how the law can be twisted and screwed into new shapes to benefit the wealthy, and to win at any cost and on any viable basis. As politicians, they are wealthy, and in a position to make laws.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Too late to run and hide now by Genda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Until you realize the only reason you need a lawyer, is because of other lawyers...

    5. Re:Too late to run and hide now by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is all too easy to slam lawyers, but a lawyer is your best friend when you need one.

      Wrong. A lawyer is a necessary evil when I need one, and I only need one because of the efforts and actions of other lawyers. Even a good lawyer is part of a broken system designed to maintain the status quo, and therefore part of the problem even when they try to be part of the solution.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Re:If you notice on the front page of ""slashdot"" by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Patent trolling is of interest to many a nerd. Don't like it, don't read the article. I rarely read a bitcoin article. If you really, really hate it you can go over to Reddit.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  3. It will make a difference ... a bad difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given what's happened so far, this will probably make the judge MORE angry than he already is, and he will still expect the lawyers in question to show up on April 2nd and explain their actions so far even if they don't have a single other case pending in the country. Also, if they're madly filling requests for dismissals in other jurisdictions, it's going to be awfully difficult to offer the usual suite of lame excuses for not complying with the order (i.e. if you had the time to file these other requests for dismissal, then you certainly had the time to respond to a judge's order).

    I think the only options left for these guys are either to rat each other out first and hope for leniency (standard prisoner's dilemma), flee the country, or pick a new career. And some of those aren't mutually-exclusive options.

    1. Re:It will make a difference ... a bad difference by achbed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From what I've read, they are trying to minimize the possible damage. The biggest change that these dismissals make is from an ONGOING fraud on the court, to a PAST defraud on the court. Using that rationality, however, you can then conclude that the only reason to drop the case(s) is that the allegations are true. If they were false, they'd simply fight the accusation and allow the other cases to proceed (probably continued pending outcome of the allegations).

      I do note however that most (not all) the relevant cases were dropped without prejudice, meaning that if they survive, they plan on re-filing the cases. I seriously wonder if the top people involved are busy buying up land in a non-extradition country. The judge might include flight risk in his next order, and get their passports revoked.

  4. Re:If you notice on the front page of ""slashdot"" by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you think porn has nothing to do with nerds, I'm afraid you're sadly mistaken.

  5. Re:If you notice on the front page of ""slashdot"" by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you've *done* all the porn on the Internet, you'll be too sore to get anything else done.

  6. Re:If you notice on the front page of ""slashdot"" by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sadly, copyright and patent law has a LOT to do with nerds. Especially those of us who develop software either for a living or as a hobby.

    I can't include any code in a commercial project without first checking whether the license allows my intended use and what I need to do in order to comply. Similarly I don't release any significant amount of code to the public without first attaching an appropriate license to it (or atleast explicitely releasing to the public domain).

    If I don't, some asshole (like the one in TFA) that has never produced any net positive to society will try to turn my efforts into a net negative. Some minimal understanding of copyright and patent law should be a minimal requirement for any software developer.

    It's the price you have to pay for allowing border-line sociopaths to walk around freely.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  7. Re:Who are the owners and operators of Prenda Law? by ais523 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Be careful. Part of the reason that this mess came about in the first place was that they'd given false names/addresses when filing a court case. And in general, the confusion is that nobody's sure who's meant to be in charge, if anyone. The judge has spent much of the court case so far trying to work it out; and is probably in a better position to enforce a punishment too.

    --
    (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
  8. Re:I'll slam BOTH, thank-you.... by Miseph · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry you and your buddy have only met truly reprehensible lawyers. I know several who are good, honest, thoughtful people who genuinely try to make the world around them a better place. Granted, I've also met a hunch who are slimeballs I would just as soon push in front of a bus, but I've met a lot of people who are slimeballs that I would just as soon push in front of a bus who aren't lawyers, so it doesn't seem fair to say lawyers are necessarily any worse than the rest of humanity.

    If anything, I've met a greater percentage of sales and corporate management types who would contribute more to the benefit of mankind by dying messily than I have lawyers, but YMMV.

    --
    Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  9. Re:I'll slam BOTH, thank-you.... by loneDreamer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In particular, I have a friend who IS a good, honest, thoughtful lawyer, and HIS opinion after working in the field is that lawyers, in general, should be pushed in front of a bus. My astonished question was: Hey man, that includes you, you know. His answer was: Nevertheless, it would be for the common good.