Galaxy S 4 Dominates In Early Benchmark Testing
redkemper writes with an excerpt from BGR.com of interest to anyone in the market for a new phone: "Samsung's Galaxy S 4 might not offer much in the way of an exciting new exterior design, but inside, it's a completely different story. The retooled internals on the U.S. version of the Galaxy S 4 were put to the test by benchmark specialists Primate Labs and the results are impressive, to say the least. The Galaxy S 4 scored a 3,163 on the standard Geekbench 2 speed test, just shy of twice the iPhone 5's score of 1,596. That score was also good enough to top the upcoming HTC One, the Nexus 4 and the previous-generation Galaxy S III."
sgs 3 is better than iphone5 in that chart
The international sgs 3 is better, the US sgs 3 isn't.
I was never sure why samsung put a slower soc in the phones that went to the US.
You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
the CPU and GPU in the iphone 5 were cutting edge for 2012.
i'm playing Real Racing 3 and the graphics are about as good as the xbox
MHz or GHz speed has never been a good predictor of actual processing power. Intel sold 4GHz CPU's 10 years ago. the 2GHz ones they sell now are A LOT faster
cpu/gpu architecture and the having the software actually take advantage of the hardware features will give you better performance than paper specs
The faster Samsung processor used in the international versions didn't work with the 4G LTE that we have in the States.
Qualcomm's "Snapdragon has good in-package support for cellular flavors in common use in the US. As can be seen in the wikipedia list, that puts them in quite a few US-release phones, even from people like Samsung who have their own SoCs.
CyanogenMod is posting across social networks that this is just the opinion of some of the devs, but is not the stance of project.
Found on G+ just now: