Slashdot Mirror


Sewage Plants Struggle To Treat Fracking Wastewater

MTorrice writes "When energy companies extract natural gas trapped deep underground using hydraulic fracturing, they're left with water containing high levels of pollutants, including benzene and barium. Sometimes the gas producers dispose of this fracking wastewater by sending it to treatment plants that deal with sewage and water from other industrial sources. But a new study (abstract) suggests that the plants can't handle this water's high levels of contaminants: Water flowing out of the plants into the environment still has elevated levels of the chemicals from natural gas production."

4 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. Formula for success by Applekid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How to be successful:
    * Socialize the risks
    * Privatize the profits

    Even commercial car washes have limits on pollutants they pass forward to water treatment plants. I guess someone just conveniently forgot to include these energy companies.

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
  2. The Solution to Pollution is Huge Fines by Eugriped3z · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So that simple-minded corporations won't confuse themselves wondering if it might be cheaper to risk getting caught.

    There's no excuse for allowing energy companies, some of the most profitable in existence to off-load (externalize) the cost of their operations and subsidize their profits by burdening public utilities with the clean up expense, especially when those facilities were never intended to deal with substances like those used in the 'proprietary mixtures' that fracking companies have protected from the prying eyes of the public.

    Setting standards that require these morons to clean up their own mess, and attaching penalties for failure that put violartors out of business is the only thing U.S. corporations understand.

  3. Fracking is good technoglogy by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The only problem is idiots that don't want to use it responsibly. Fracking makes energy cheaply. That's a good idea.

    The problem is it has clear environmental risks that the frackers don't want to discuss.

    They don't want to tell you what they put into the ground (because they are afraid people will sue them - or steal their wonderful business secrets).

    Being in business means you get sued. Deal with it. As for business secrets - ever hear of patents????

    The truth is that Frackers are having problems not because the technology they use is more dangerous than other tech, but because they are so damn greedy they want to do so without taking reasonable safety and anti-pollution precautions. Let's be honest here - the EPA is not know for being a hard-ass. They let people get away with amazingly evil misdeeds before they take action.

    I am all in favor of fracking - if they publicly reveal everything they pump into the ground and take reasonable steps to ameliorate the problems.

    Yes this will cost more. But fracking will still be cheap. We have a right to cheap CLEAN energy, not just cheap energy.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  4. Re:Externalities Rule by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real answer is to fill the CEO's swimming pool with it. If it fills up, fill the bathtub, kitchen sink, etc finally, just water his lawn with the rest.

    I'll bet if we implemented a lottery system where that would happen at random, that water would be sparkling clean coming out of the plants no matter what the cost.