Slashdot Mirror


The Non-Profit .Org Registry Works Behind the Scenes (Video)

ICANN.org says, "The DotOrg Foundation [update: Note that the organization is now known as the Public Interest Registry], along with its operating partners, is committed to stable, efficient and affordable management of the .org registry." Most of us don't spend a lot of time thinking about the Internet's basic "plumbing," and few spend much time thinking about .org and the group that is responsible for maintaining it. That group did, however, have a booth at SXSW. That's where Timothy Lord interviewed .org spokesperson Thuy LeDinh, who was happy to explain what the .org people do and why they do it.

21 comments

  1. NGO vs NPO by rwade · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So part of this expansion that I was talking about with 2000 new domain names coming is .ngo. It is a term that most Americans don’t know. But if you work in the non-profit non-governmental, you actually would have heard of NGO, which stands for non-government organizations.

    Indeed -- for the lay man not briefed into this kind of world, the distinction between an NGO and an NPO is highly irrelevant. I think the addition of the .ngo TLD is a solution looking for a problem.

  2. Plumbing? by ronpaulisanidiot · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought after we collectively eviscerated Ted Stevens for his "series of tubes" comment that the internet clearly had no tubes at all. This plumbing thing must be a typo.

  3. Why are we listening to ICANN? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    They never listen to anyone else, so listening to them seems shortsighted. We have seen that they will ultimately favor whatever decision pays them the best, regardless of what consequences it may have on the rest of the internet. Likely this bit from them is nothing more than self promotion released in the hope of making themselves look like they give a shit about anyone.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  4. .org is old by wbr1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am currently bidding on .orgy as a TLD :)

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:.org is old by imikem · · Score: 0

      Sadly, owning .orgy is likely as close as anyone on /. will ever get to one in meatspace (yes, pun intended).

      --
      Perscriptio in manibus tabellariorum est.
    2. Re:.org is old by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Not if you lower your standards far enough.

    3. Re:.org is old by Roblimo · · Score: 1

      Be clever - register a domain along the lines of SexyDudeWantsWomanFor.org (it's available) and refer everything to this page: SexyDudeWantsWomanFor.org/y -

    4. Re:.org is old by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ok, you're doing this wrong. there's two ways you can fix it, either change it to SexyDudesWantWomanFor.org or most likely you'd want the SexyDudeWantsWomenFor.org

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:.org is old by CanEHdian · · Score: 1

      Uhhh.... good thing you weren't posting this at PyCon or you risked being fired if the wrong person read your post.

      This is just to illustrate how ridiculous that whole PyCon story is.

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
  5. my staff sent me an internet by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    Ted Stevens eviscerated Ted Stevens.

    He should have stuck to bringing home pork. He didn't get to be the longest-serving Republican senator because he was bad at his job. Sarah Palin on the other hand... ...yeah okay maybe there's a pattern here.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  6. Org NE No proffits by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    Oh dear the submitter seems to brought into the idea that .org is *only* for not for profits (and defend in the narrow USA only way) .org is for anything that didn't fit into the other TLD's - you want to ask Jamie Zawinski to hand back jwz.org?

    One of the front runners to run the .org registry failed when thy tried to exclude organizations like the red cross and oxfam from having .org as they are not nonprofits in the US sense and promptly got there ass handed to them.

    Disclaimer I used to work for poptel who built .coop and also bid for .org so i know something of the shenanigans that goes on at ICANT.

  7. Slashdot is not profitable, must be why it's .org by RocketRabbit · · Score: 0

    I always wondered, with the switch from being a little discussion forum in the early days, when Slashdot would go .com and give up the .org domain name. It seems, like the man in the video said, that this sort of thing works itself out organically though.

  8. Re:Slashdot is not profitable, must be why it's .o by Roblimo · · Score: 1

    Slashdot.com works just fine. Try it.

  9. Re:My HOST file is available FREE for non-profit o by nullchar · · Score: 0

    It'd be more awesome if the post was funny. +2 for style! The bolding, italicizing, and font changes are all spot-on, but the content is difficult to parse.

    And I was looking forward to a good APK troll... and now sadly disappointed.

  10. Fucking Verisign spinoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the relationship between Public Internet Registry & Verisign? I checked the address of PIR, they're just down the street from Verisign.

    Verisign is already a private company which essentially controls the majority of DNS (.com and .net). What is it with these northern Virginia companies that produce nothing, but just suck down cash?

    When will this stuff be LEGITIMATELY open for competition? Sure, the .com contract goes up for renewal every ~7 years, but let's face it, the fix is already in. It's Verisign's to lose.

    Disgusting.