Slashdot Mirror


Study Finds Universe Is 100 Million Years Older Than Previously Thought

skade88 writes "Reuters is reporting that scientists now say the universe is 100 million years older than previously thought after they took a closer look at leftover radiation from the Big Bang. This puts the age of the Universe at 13.8 billion years. The new findings are the direct results from analyzing data provided by the European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft. The spacecraft is providing the most detailed look to date at the remnant microwave radiation that permeates the universe. 'It's as if we've gone from a standard television to a high-definition television. New and important details have become crystal clear,' Paul Hertz, NASA's director of astrophysics, told reporters on a conference call."

14 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. Important details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I did not notice an increase in important details when upgrading to HDTV. Maybe I should get a better HDMI cable with more gold.

  2. Blaspheming liars! by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It says right here in my textbook tha God created the universe 13.7 billion years ago.

  3. YEC by Alsee · · Score: 1, Funny

    The universe is 100,006,000 years old!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  4. The universe is clearly a female entity... by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lying about its age like that.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:The universe is clearly a female entity... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Does this Dark Matter make my galaxies look fat?"

  5. Re:But I just want to know ... by Phics · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Great Green Arkleseizure sneezed.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world; those who believe there are two types of people, and those who don't.
  6. Re:The difference between science and religion by MessageApprovalMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yep, the bible is interpreted exactly the same as it was 2000 years ago.

    The Bible isn't interpreted. It was compiled.

    --
    I'm Message Approval Man, and I approve this message.
  7. Re:The difference between science and religion by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but only into Koine Greek bytecode, so it's kinda on the fence...

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  8. Re:If anyone believes the age of the universe... by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

    " I'll sell you a bridge."

    Does it come with working viewsceens, crew stations, a captains chair and a turbolift?
    and a replicator?

  9. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The universe came into existence last Tuesday. You're almost as bad as the Last Mondayers, fucking heretics.

  10. Re:Gee, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The good news is we now know the age of the universe. The bad news is that the warranty just expired.

  11. Da Big Bang... by bayankaran · · Score: 1, Funny

    Big Bang is only a theory. As far as I know it is the theory with the most number of followers so it is assumed to be truer than others.

    I have a feeling the Deterministic school of thought which governs science is failing to answer the big questions. I am not saying the alternates available - religion and other other super natural stuff - is better, but we need a third model.

    And until a new model is found, lets collectively gasp at da big bang!!!

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
  12. Re:The difference between science and religion by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is Slashdot's sarcasm meter broken again today?

    It a US site, it doesn't have a sarcasm meter! /ducks

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  13. Re: The difference between science and religion by chomps22 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hi, This is a profound statement "The bible has to be interpreted differently than the plain meaning of the words...doesn't fit with modern understanding" The Bible will never fit with modern understanding. Modern understanding should fit wiuth the bible. The problem with science is that they are desperatly trying to get mankind away from scripture and base everything on our own understanding, which is the wrong approach. The bible will never make sense to the average man (worldly person) it is a manual for the christian like when you by a pc or motherboard you get a manual with it. The average person dowsn't undersatand it. To say the universe is millions of years old is rediculous...they also said the earth was flat at one stage...think about that. The bible was documented way before scientist even existed. Ask yourself: why dont we have any books, scrolls, or documents dating back 1million years or 500,000 years, not even 50,000 years...the oldest documentation we know of dates back about +-7000 years, strange hey, evolutionists are trying to brainwash everyone, and they are doing a great job of it, especialy with naieve nations like America and Europe. Please take some time to study other material and not just man's theories. What does God think of this? Ask Him. It will solve all your problems look at: http://www.infrabyte.com/?p=12 to see how they get to this age