Slashdot Mirror


Targeted Attack Campaign Uses Android Malware

Trailrunner7 writes "Android attacks have become all the rage in the last year or two, and targeted attacks against political activists in Tibet, Iran and other countries have been bubbling up to the surface more and more often. Now, those two trends have converged with the discovery of a targeted attack campaign that's going after Tibetan and Uyghur activists with a spear-phishing message containing a malicious APK file. Researchers say the attack appears to be coming from Chinese sources. The new campaign began a few days ago when unknown attackers were able to compromise the email account of a well-known Tibetan activist. The attackers then used that account to begin sending a series of spear-phishing messages to other activists in the victim's contact list. One of the messages referred to a human rights conference in Geneva in March, using the recipients' legitimate interest in the conference as bait to get them to open the attachment. The malicious attachment in the emails is named 'WUC's Conference.apk.'"

74 comments

  1. Harvests info by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Android App harvests information (contacts, SMS messages, location, SIM data) and reports it back only when ordered to by the reception of a SMS message command. The location is particularly troubling because they can just keep pinging the phone to track the individual in real-time, then who knows what could happen next.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Harvests info by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      So you're saying this isn't a "malware" problem so much as it is a "Chinese government hacking dissidents phones to try to find other people to throw in jail for political speech."

    2. Re:Harvests info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what you aren't saying is "our country does the exact same fucking thing."

      I wonder is that out of ignorance or fear?

    3. Re:Harvests info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume by "our" you're referring to European countries and their speech laws.

    4. Re:Harvests info by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's your point? I can't criticize one government for something if the government where I live does anything similar?

      Or are you pushing a straw man argument here, that I was suggesting the US government didn't do anything like that?

      Honestly, fuck off. Bad government is bad government, no matter if my government is the same or worse.

  2. Trust No One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Any communication method you use can and will be compromised.

    1. Re:Trust No One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My tins cans and string solution is very secure.

    2. Re:Trust No One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like you haven't noticed my tapping wire... (although I have to say, there's quite some noise on that signal)

  3. Re:Lol by CodeReign · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Cue the Fandroid apologists.

    Phandroid checking in.

    Shit can't be fixed if the vendor is shit. Get a Nexus device and always have a secure fucking awesome device.

  4. Superior Unix Architecture? by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Whatever happened to the folks who claimed in +5 insightful posts that Linux has better security because of the superior Unix architecture? And that Windows malware, spyware, viruses and etc. were because of the crappy Windows code and not just because of popularity?

    As Macs grow more popular, so does the malware targeting it. And Android has a huge malware problem. Perhaps those posts were wrong?

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by schitso · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Regardless of the system, an incompetent privileged user is always going to be a vulnerability.

    2. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Android actually Unix like?, It only has a non mainline Linux kernel, not regular GNU/Linux.

    3. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Superior Unix Architecture is running a JVM, and the .apk file is operating under that virtual machine.

      If you take a great looking, brand new pickup truck and hitch it to a full manure spreader, it's still going to stink.

    4. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Threni · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone is saying:

      1) it's impossible to write a layer of abstraction above Linux, and
      2) for that system to support the installation of software outside of the control of the vendor of that layer of abstraction, and
      3) for that software to potentially perform some action the user isn't aware of

    5. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      And that Windows malware, spyware, viruses and etc. were because of the crappy Windows code and not just because of popularity?

      Microsoft isn't off the hook by any means.

      There are still several orders of magnitude more malware for Windows than any other platform, despite Android overtaking it in the market. Android malware is also almost exclusively socially engineered, rather than exploiting OS flaws. The same can't be said for Windows.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      Windows being crappy code isn't the only complaint by any means. The fact that it is locked down so the user doesn't have control is as big a complaint. Having to hack your phone to gain control is a perfect example of lack of control.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    7. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by recoiledsnake · · Score: 1

      Windows has a bigger install base than Android, and PCs are far more lucrative target than a weak phone with a weak data connection.

      Android malware is also almost exclusively socially engineered, rather than exploiting OS flaws. The same can't be said for Windows.

      What OS flaws? Reference? The vast majority of Windows malware is through downloads, like fake codecs.

      --
      This space for rent.
    8. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows has a bigger install base than Android, and PCs are far more lucrative target than a weak phone with a weak data connection.

      Android will overtake Windows installed base in just a couple of years. Even now, there are not several orders of magnitude more Windows machines than Android.

      What OS flaws? Reference?

      http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=malware+windows+vulnerability

    9. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      It's worth pointing out that Android does everything right. By default "unknown sources" is disabled, so the user has to go and turn that on and see the warning. Then when they for install it tells them that the apple will know where they are, read their contacts, read SMS messages etc. Really if you are dumb enough to fall for this, especially when you know people are out to get you and basic online safety says don't install stuff from attachments then it's your own fault, not Android.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by smash · · Score: 1

      It depends on the context. If we are counting end user Linux installs on slashdot, yes. If we are counting security vulnerabilities, no.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    11. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Android does not everything right. You can not revoke application rights without uninstalling it. There is no way for application to mark privileges optional. There is no way for the user to know whether app needs contact list or internet access only for legitimate things or not. Basically, android security is all or nothing proposition with android store containing malware and spyware all too often.

      As it is now, even legitimate applications ask for dangerous privileges cause they need to have that one tiny feature only subset of users need. There is simply no way to distinguish between legitimate and non legitimate apps. So most people end up in one in two states: download everything or download nothing. One is unsafe and other makes your smart phone as good as dumb phone.

    12. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by wolverine2k · · Score: 0

      Permissions Pro is the apk for you :)

    13. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the system, an incompetent privileged user is always going to be a vulnerability.

      And that's why the malware problem on Android is so bad - the users are more incompetent than the iOS users.

    14. Re:Superior Unix Architecture? by schitso · · Score: 1

      You almost had me. Happy April Fools Day to you, too.

  5. Re:Lol by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No apologies here. If someone is stupid enough to install a program they receive in email and they weren't expecting one? C'mon!

    I'd still rather be able to choose what I want to install than to have the maker and/or seller of the device make those decisions for me.

  6. Re:Lol by Nerdfest · · Score: 0

    Sure it can, you can take all of the users rights and abilities to choose what software they can install. Apparently some people need that and are willing to sacrifice truly owning their own hardware to get it. Strangely, most of them are proud of it too.

  7. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Non sequiturs are insightful? How would have running a Nexus device have stopped this?

  8. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tuppe666 should be here shortly to meet your needs.

  9. chinese culture itself is corrupt and poisonous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is no concept of the worth of an individual. A person is only worth as much as he can be used by his rulers. Anyone who isn't enthusiastically supporting the rulers is considered subhuman to be disposed of like any other vermin.

    I really hope the US has a doomsday satellite in orbit because better humanity be wiped out that be subject to chinese rule.

  10. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can Nexus access/get updates from the Google store in SE Asia?

    Because it can't in China. So you don't get a secure fucking awesome device.

  11. Re:Just use a custom hosts file that blocks malwar by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wrong APK :)

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  12. Dealing with incompetent device owner by tepples · · Score: 0

    Then what's the solution when the median device owner has proven incompetent? Take away privilege from the general public and sell it back to interested adults for an annual fee? That's what Apple does on iOS.

    1. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by LDAPMAN · · Score: 2

      Exactly right! That is the solution. To be able to do what you like you need $99/yr and enough knowledge to run Xcode. I think it's a pretty good solution.

    2. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by schitso · · Score: 2

      Er, no? How about take away the privilege by default, and require that the user enable the ability install potentially insecure apps? Those of us who are responsible with our devices shouldn't have to pay the maker of our preferred OS to toggle a setting.

    3. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Informative

      ... yeah, don't you need to buy a Mac as well? I think a check box in the settings works perfectly fine.

    4. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      There is no solution for stupidity. You accept that it will happen, try to mitigate it as best you can, and you move on. It's still not worth giving up your rights over.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    5. Re:Dealing with incompetent device owner by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      ... yeah, don't you need to buy a Mac as well? I think a check box in the settings works perfectly fine.

      I'm sympathetic to the idea that it might be useful to make it a bit more difficult, like downloading a free app with the checkbox in, or executing an adb command. But it's ridiculous to expect the user to spend any amount of money to control their own device.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Targeted Phone Attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember 1996 when the mossad used an exploding cell phone to attack a Hamas bomb maker. 'That you Yahya? Bubbye. Kaboom!'

    Now I read about this Android "attack" I can't help but think that you nerds are just pathetic. Seriously pathetic!

    Captcha reads : Pansies. How prescient of it.

    1. Re:Targeted Phone Attacks by cavreader · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Before cellular phones existed the Israelis targeted one of the people responsible for the Munich Olympic killings using a good ole fashion public phone. Technology marches on but usually the end result remains basically the same.

  14. Free Tibet, but not Uyghurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am all for Tibet becoming independent of China. However, for Xinxiang and any other Uyghur lands, I don't. The Tibetans would happily settle down in peace (sorta like Bhutan) if made independent and left alone. The Uyghurs would probably try and enable Jihad in the neighboring Soviet '-stans' with the goal of getting a greater Turkestan made up of the Soviet '-stans' and Xinxiang, and gang up with Turkey for bigger Jihads

    1. Re:Free Tibet, but not Uyghurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Well put and explained.

    2. Re:Free Tibet, but not Uyghurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gang up with Turkey? Or gang up against Turkey? Turkey is one of the most secular Muslim majority states.

  15. Re:Lol by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If someone is stupid enough to install a program they receive in email and they weren't expecting one? C'mon!

    It's called spear phishing. Where instead of blasting a million messages to everyone at random, you send a very plausible message to someone who ought to know the sender.

    Basically, what happened here is someone hacked an activiist's email account, and used it to send a plausible looking message to their contacts, like say, something about an upcoming human rights conference. The recipient sees it's from someone they trust and the message is appropriate to their relationship (i.e., it came from a human rights activist and is about a human rights conference).

    Yes, you probably should not be clicking links from anyone, even those of your trusted friends and relatives, but for most people, they believe it's authentic. Hell, the RSA hack happened the same way - a faked email coming from the hiriing company RSA uses went to the HR coordinator claiming to be a list of new hires.

  16. Re:Learn the TRUTH about host files... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol => real APK is "longer" than fake APK. I guess we know how the "bitch" is!!

  17. Re:Lol by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

    The whole point of Android is freedom, as in secure your own shit as much as you want freedom, if you can't handle it I believe they make iOS for those people. Till them most of android's security apps come from the community / vendors.

    Then again, these guys installed APK files they got in their email, there is little to no hope there, most ppl don't know what an apk file is much less whether to click on it. Solution? Treat APKs as .exe , which email providers block for the very reason listed in this article, problem solved.

  18. I feel like helping you by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you want, I can provide you some space on my web server so that you don't have to copy and paste your promotion of hosts files like that. Reply here if interested.

  19. Can't Help by tuppe666 · · Score: 0

    Tuppe666 should be here shortly to meet your needs.

    I'd love to to I am just running through my daily ceremony of eating each of Androids codenames, which I do three times[On friday I fast to remind myself of less fortunate Operating Systems], followed by bathing and chanting the words "smarter mobile devices that are more aware of its owner's location and preferences". Then I do the holy "status bar emptying"....The daily cleansing of the internet doesn't start for hours.

  20. Malicious APK spear-phishing malware .. by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    "Android attacks have become all the rage"

    Except a user tricked into downloading and installing malware from some third party location, in no way shape or form, relates to Android security !

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Malicious APK spear-phishing malware .. by smash · · Score: 1

      Just like Java exploits requiring the user to type their administrative credentials in relate to Windows or OS X security.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  21. User installed malware and Unix architecture? by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    "Whatever happened to the folks who claimed in +5 insightful posts that Linux has better security because of the superior Unix architecture?

    What has the actions of some user in installing malware got to do with the security of the architecture?

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:User installed malware and Unix architecture? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      More to the point, this has nothing to do with Linux security. The kernel is not being compromised in this exploit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. Stand up for a Free Tibet, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The is a lot of misguided white noise post here, which misses the heart of the matter.

    Tibet was invaded and occupied by China in 1949. China/CCP is still trying to convince the world that Tibet is part of China and politically is winning this battle. But "the resistance," ongoing. These attacks are aimed at the resistance.

    @ erroneus (253617), your lack of trust of your own "friends," is sad. Other peeps trust theres. Upgrade time?

    @ interkin3tic, Tibetans are regularly tortured or murdered, by the CCP, in occupied Tibet. Perhaps you could do something to reform the political situation you are in, instead of having a wee tanty at those who expose abuses of power? If it was good enough for Martin Luther King, Gandi and Nelson Mandela, perhaps you could try?

    Technically, it is interesting to analyse how the CCP coded.

    In Buddhist and political terms, Stand up for a Free Tibet, please? :-)

    GreekGeek :-)

  23. Re:Lol by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Can Nexus access/get updates from the Google store in SE Asia?

    Yes, with the exception of Burma/Myanmar. Movies, Books, Music, and buying the device directly from Google Play are restricted to a small handful of Western countries, but Apps and Updates are available pretty much everywhere (except China and countries under embargo by US).

  24. Yes, in Hongkong and Taiwan by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Nexus devices are available in Hongkong and in Taiwan

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  25. Re:Lol by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yeah but it sucks if the fucker I just emailed got pwned on his android and now the chinese govmt is all up in my business. fact: the android ecosystem is insecure. If an android phone touches your virtual sphere, it is a disease vector.

  26. Oh, attactment from unknown source! by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Let's click it. What is this, 1995?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Oh, attactment from unknown source! by antdude · · Score: 1

      It will be forever. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  27. Re:Lol by elashish14 · · Score: 1

    Phishing is not a flaw in the software - it's a flaw in the human that's using the software. PEBKAC, if you will (metaphorically of course).

    Coming from a disillusioned Android user who's hoping to switch to FirefoxOS when possible.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  28. Re:Lol by elashish14 · · Score: 1

    No....

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  29. Re:Lol by elashish14 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's still no excuse. YOU DO NOT OPEN ATTACHMENTS THAT YOU ARE NOT EXPECTING. It doesn't matter who the source is. Anyone could get hacked. Even if the source is someone you trust, but the message seems out of the blue and not something you expect, you get back in touch with them and ask if they sent it. Just because the message seems authentic doesn't mean that it is. It's still your fault as the user for trusting something that you shouldn't.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  30. Re:Lol by smash · · Score: 1

    So when this is considered best practice on Windows its a horrible security problem, but when it's considered best practice on android it's no big deal?

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  31. The dancing bunnies problem by tepples · · Score: 1

    How about take away the privilege by default, and require that the user enable the ability install potentially insecure apps?

    That's what Android does (the "Unknown sources" checkbox) and what Mac OS X does (Gatekeeper choosing among App Store only, registered Mac developers only, or all executables). But you'll end up with the majority of users having enabled that ability and left it enabled because at some time in the past they wanted to see dancing bunnies.

  32. Re:Lol by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2

    that's fine, just don't text/email/call me from your android, so i can be sure I'm safe.

  33. Re:Lol by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

    In case you failed to read my post somehow let me restate it for you: Android is as secure as you make it. Now go read some books or something.

  34. Re:Lol by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    that's the whole issue. Even if my android is secure, if somebody else's android is pwned then I can get screwed as well: Voice - the other android's voice call is being recoreded/processed, grabs my credit card #, SSN, or other info. Text: the other android is compromisded, sends me a text that appears to be from a friend. Email: same as text. In short, My security is at risk whenever I connect with somebody else using Android. My iPhone is really good at identifying which of my contacts has an iPhone vs. other, so this is a layer of added security for iOS.

  35. Re:Lol by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

    so... when your friend sends you an apk file w/o prior notice... does that not strike you as the least bit odd?

    And... do you realize in regards to phishing / spear phishing that both Android and iOS are equally vulnerable to it? Apple just likes to keep the blind fold on its customers while it collects their anatomical sizes.

  36. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No surprise at all. Some people actually WANT to replicate the cesspool of problems Windows had into the mobile future. Most people (almost nobody here) just wants it to work.