Slashdot Mirror


Festo's Drone Dragonfly Takes To the Air

yyzmcleod writes "Building on the work of last year's bionic creation, the Smart Bird, Festo announced that it will literally launch its latest creation, the BionicOpter, at Hannover Messe in April. With a wingspan of 63 cm and weighing in at 175 grams, the robotic dragonfly mimics all forms of flight as its natural counterpart, including hover, glide and maneuvering in all directions. This is made possible, the company says, by the BionicOpter's ability to move each of its four wings independently, as well as control their amplitude, frequency and angle of attack. Including its actuated head and body, the robot exhibits 13 degrees of freedom, which allows it to rapidly accelerate, decelerate, turn and fly backwards."

45 comments

  1. Eventually the Monicans will use these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to overthrow the government. The chairman better watch his back....

  2. Off-Topic: Question about Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who am I supposed to contact to whine about the new vote up/down buttons on stories? I was under the impression /. users voted on stores before they got to the main page. If I wanted Reddit, I'd be reading Reddit.

    Where is Slashdot's change log for the new features it tries to implement?

  3. meh by ganjadude · · Score: 0

    lemme know when they got the bee robot from the richie rich movie.

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    1. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, butt wait! Soon they'll have one so small it'll fly up your arse, and TSA will be able to deploy it up your arse without a warrant.

  4. Re:Off-Topic: Question about Slashdot by cheater512 · · Score: 2

    /dev/null

  5. Open loop control system? by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that a control system implies a closed loop or feedback mechanism i.e. a system that measures the current state, and decides an actuation mechanism to get to where it wants to go. Do they mean autonomous and non-autonomous modes instead?

    1. Re:Open loop control system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Probably not. It may mean that there's modes based on pre-programmed wing flap timings. It may also mean that there's hidden variables regarding the craft's real world state that the engineers have to guess at with sensors rather than know for certain.

    2. Re:Open loop control system? by Attila+the+Bun · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was under the impression that a control system implies a closed loop or feedback mechanism

      Feedback is a great way to stabilise a system, but it is not essential. A stepper motor - even a precise one, like the one in your watch - does not require readback from a position encoder to function. Digital audio amplifiers do not need negative feedback in order to achieve proper linearity, like analogue amplifiers do.

      Sometimes it is desirable to do without feedback. The auto-focus mechanism in a professional camera operates without feedback in order to work at the highest possible speed. The lens motor and AF sensor are carefully calibrated so that focus is achieved in a single measurement-movement cycle. This is faster than making multiple measurements, which requires the lens motor to be stopped during each measurement. Feedback is only used to confirm autofocus success, and trigger a second attempt in case of failure.

    3. Re:Open loop control system? by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 1

      But if you don't have feedback, what do you mean by a 'control-system'? An open loop control system would be like a look-up table or something: decide apriori what you want to do, and then apply the pre-computed action without any measurements or correction system. But then, there really isn't a control-system, because it doesn't account for errors (the only way to know if there are errors is via measurements, which constitutes feedback).

      For such a complex system, I'd be very surprised if they are doing open-loop actuation.

    4. Re:Open loop control system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lens motor AF sensor are carefully calibrated

      Feedback is only used to confirm autofocus success, and trigger a second attempt in case of failure.

      Pseudo-open loop with post-actuation recalibration.

  6. Danny Dunn Lives! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Patent trolls take note - 40 year old prior art.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  7. Re:Off-Topic: Question about Slashdot by ThePhilips · · Score: 2

    You of course meant the /dev/zero.

    /dev/null is only good for writing into.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  8. And according to the pictures by Hentes · · Score: 1

    it's made out of Lego.

  9. Decelerate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they mean a negative force of acceleration.

  10. Another triumph from Festo by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    Very nice. Festo, which is a German industrial robotics firm, does a technical tour de force every year. They built a robotic bird two years ago. In 2009, they built a robot penguin" which swims beautifully.

    Festo does this to sell their industrial robotics systems, which are very well made.

    1. Re:Another triumph from Festo by Moofie · · Score: 3, Informative

      The power tools built by their subsidiary are works of art.

      http://festoolusa.com/

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  11. Great target for the by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1
  12. Collective Pitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While angle of attack is accurate in describing rotor action, it's more commonly used to describe the angle at which a craft's nose cuts into the wind to offset the angle of sideslip in determine a heading. Collective pitch is the more commonly used term for the angle at which a rotor blade is set to provide downward or upward pitch in descriptions of airscrews and helicopters.

    1. Re:Collective Pitch by camperdave · · Score: 4, Informative

      While angle of attack is accurate in describing rotor action, it's more commonly used to describe the angle at which a craft's nose cuts into the wind to offset the angle of sideslip in determine a heading.

      I've never heard angle of attack described that way. It's always described as the angle of the chord of the wing relative to the direction of the airflow - the pitch of the wing, not the yaw of the aircraft.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  13. Weaponize It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vast majority of flying robots in operation around the world are now military or police, and are either equipped with weaponry or surveillance gear. We're all getting used to the idea that whenever a flying robot comes into view, you should hide. Since this one can go forwards or backwards, it should have a poisoned spike on the end of the tail and a poison dart blowgun mounted on the front.

  14. that band name by Jericho+Whiplash · · Score: 1

    13 Degrees Of Freedom - great name for a band

  15. That's one big dragonfly by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    63cm wingspan? I don't know where this inventor is from, but I've never seen a live dragonfly with a wingspan anywhere near that.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:That's one big dragonfly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's about right for prehistoric dragonflies.

    2. Re:That's one big dragonfly by Longjmp · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, you haven't seen one, but they existed.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meganeura

      --
      There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
  16. It's not *where* they're from, by ridgecritter · · Score: 1
  17. Danny Dunn Invisible Boy by sanman2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read that book in my childhood - great to see it finally come to real life!

    http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/727375.Danny_Dunn_Invisible_Boy

    Makes me shudder to think how many other sci-fi stories from childhood will come to real life.

    1. Re:Danny Dunn Invisible Boy by sanman2 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Danny Dunn Invisible Boy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Makes me shudder to think how many other sci-fi stories from childhood will come to real life.

      See also, http://www.technovelgy.com/

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. CIA flew one more than forty years ago by Sla$hPot · · Score: 0

    Much smaller though. But very impressive never the less, considering the available technology at that time.
    http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/30/cia-dragonfly-drone-uavs-40-years/

  19. Fancier, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't seem like that big an improvement on the Wowee Dragonfly from 6+ years ago. Maybe a tad more stable and definitely bigger, but it still seems quite awkward. (Probably need to figure out how to do the proper figure-8 wing flap motion from real insects before a significant improvement is seen. Might also need something lighter to drive the wings in a more responsive way like a countersprung linear actuator rather than gear drives.)

  20. Gimme a flock with frickin "lasers" on their heads by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    ...and I'll rule the frickin world.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  21. Helicopter Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It should be noted that while helicopters can do all of these things, it really isn't that good at it. Hovering is actually quite a stress inducing activity, and most helicopters will completely avoid this as much as possible. This could in theory create a viable alternative that could be run with a simple up/down, turn, and movement interface.

  22. Re:Off-Topic: Question about Slashdot by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

    /dev/null is only good for writing into.

    Yes, thus answering the question "Who am I supposed to contact to whine about the new vote up/down buttons on stories?".

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  23. I can't decide.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to think this is really cool, but in a way, the video was just plain creepy. Made me think of a kickstarter company to make bigger fly-swatters.

  24. How robust in windy conditions? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    "With a wingspan of 63 cm and weighing in at 175 grams..."

    Would it not just be blown all over the place?

    1. Re:How robust in windy conditions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "With a wingspan of 63 cm and weighing in at 175 grams..."

      Would it not just be blown all over the place?

      The designers clearly didn't think of storm-proofing the thing. Good catch.

  25. I assume it is 63 mm not cm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 ft seems like a rather large dragonfly...

    1. Re:I assume it is 63 mm not cm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt if something with a 63 mm wingspan is going to be able to lift 175 grams.

      Well, unless there is a fuse attached!

  26. Language Differences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a German industrial robotics firm, does a technical tour de force every year.

    It's interesting that what you call a technical tour de force, I call a mildly interesting R/C model aircraft of little technical value and no practical use.

  27. It's not I folks: It's Jeremiah Cornelius... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS is why he's doing it & proof of it, here -> http://interviews.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3585927&cid=43295193 when others pointed out Jeremiah Cornelius forgot to submit one of the "first post spams" masquerading as myself as AC, & mistakenly submitted one of the impersonations of myself as his registered 'luser' name here on /. forums.

    Pretty pitiful actually, but like every up to no good idiot does? He screwed up & submitted it under his registered 'luser' name here, instead of his ac submittals he's been doing.

    * Jeremiah Cornelius: DO YOURSELF, and the rest of us, A GIANT FAVOR MAN: Seek professional psychiatric help!

    (Since Jeremiah Cornelius obviously can't get over the fact he made a spelling error on what it is HE ALLEGEDLY DID FOR A LIVING? That's not MY fault... it's HIS!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I seriously must have dusted JC (in his mind @ least) for his BAD spelling error & it "got his goat"...

    I.E.-> Catching what he claimed to do as a job, for YEARS he left "PENETRATION" (correct) spelled as "PENTRATION" (incorrect) on his resume on LinkedIn & I pointed it out as he & his friends trolled me as usual (webmistressrachel, gmhowell, & crew (probably ALL JC no doubt using alterate emails or TOR to do it as a possible - I've caught "them & theirs" doing it before, ala Barbara, not Barbie = TomHudson (same person))).

    So THAT is what has gotten his goat in a technical debate & his "geek angst" could only come up with *trying* to "impersonate me" in every news thread on /. for the month of March 2013 so far!

    (Just to attempt to 'discredit me' as a spammer here obviously)

    Doing so, by posting that "$10,000 challenge" &/or reposts of my old posts on hosts file value to end users into EVERY SINGLE NEWS ARTICLE POSTED on /. ...

    It's all I can think of that *might* cause such a mentally troubled 'reaction' like the Jeremiah Cornelius is doing & there's NO QUESTION he's the one doing this spamming of nearly every posted article masquerading as myself...!

    ... apk