Slashdot Mirror


Google Releases Street View Images From Fukushima Ghost Town

mdsolar writes in with news that Goolge has released Street View pictures from inside the zone that was evacuated after the Fukushima disaster. "Google Inc. (GOOG) today released images taken by its Street View service from the town of Namie, Japan, inside the zone that was evacuated after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011. Google, operator of the world's biggest Web search engine, entered Namie this month at the invitation of the town's mayor, Tamotsu Baba, and produced the 360-degree imagery for the Google Maps and Google Earth services, it said in an e-mailed statement. All of Namie's 21,000 residents were forced to flee after the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami crippled the Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear plant, about 8 kilometers (5 miles) from the town, causing the world's worst nuclear accident after Chernobyl. Baba asked Mountain View, California-based Google to map the town to create a permanent record of its state two years after the evacuation, he said in a Google blog post."

12 of 63 comments (clear)

  1. lolwut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Google releases images, but we're not going to show them to you. Or load the page's CSS.

    1. Re:lolwut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      But we are going to remind you of their ticker symbol, because everyone comes to Slashdot for investment advice.

  2. Were are the super-mutants ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like the graphics but the game play can use more work.

  3. Unmanned car ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did they use a manned, or unmanned car for this ?

    1. Re:Unmanned car ? by Maringo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And did they stop for a red light?

    2. Re:Unmanned car ? by nadaou · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In all likelihood manned. If you "drive" around for a few minutes in street view you will notice a number of other cars driving on the main roads. The acute risk from radiation has dissipated (the worst emitting particles have the shortest half-lives) the remaining threat is low-level emitting particles where the danger is more or less cumulative with time. A day spent driving around the town might be a small risk to you and your car, but you wouldn't want to live or work there every day.

      It probably wouldn't hurt to bolt an extra air filter in the cabin air intake, and give the car a good wash down afterwards, just in case you stirred up some nasties in a dust pile.

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    3. Re:Unmanned car ? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Manned of course. The exclusion zone is not a 100% ban on all people and the radiation isn't even that bad. The highest dose experts (not TEPCO) predict a person would be subjected to is 20mSv/yr, 1/5th the dose that is known to possibly cause cancer, and about the same as a commercial pilot is expected to be exposed to.

      It's easy enough to enter the exclusion zone and several photographers already have, they just haven't made the headlines on Slashdot because they took photos not a streetview.

    4. Re:Unmanned car ? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please don't try to make simplistic comparisons of mSv/yr expose, they are not valid or helpful.

      An airline pilot is exposed to radiation from outside his/her body, most of which can't penetrate the skin and none of which accumulates permanently. The next year the pilots exposure is still 20uSv/yr, and if they stop flying it drops back to normal levels.

      A person trying to live in Namie is exposed to dust, earth, paint particles, pollen and accumulated minerals and metals in the environment. It gets inside them, particularly into organs like the thyroid. It sits there irradiating them for decades, with no skin/flesh barrier. That is what causes cancer and leukemia, and that is why every child living near Chernobyl had to have their thyroid glands removed and now can't absorb calcium. Clearly it is not an acceptable place to live.

      Namie may never recover. Even if they clean it all up and make it safe most of the people who used to live there have been forced to move on. They have jobs in other places and have made new homes, or are at least trying to. They won't all just move back, and even if they did a lot of the jobs there have gone now as the companies folded and agriculture became impossible due to contamination. Some people will go back, but it will never be the same.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Unmanned car ? by Donwulff · · Score: 3, Informative

      About that, actually studies have quite consistently found airline crew annual exposure is around 2mSv/yr, see for example http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/faqs/commercial flights.html. 20mSV is the absolute maximum annual dose that "should" be allowed for airline crew, while studies have found 20mSv is typical lifetime dose for airline crew.

      There's better comparisons to put the dose rate in perspective though - for example, "Smoking an average of 1.5 packs per day gives a radiation dose of 60-160 mSv/year" (Wikipedia) while a CT-scan can give around 20mSv per examination http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/safety/index.cfm?pg=sfty_xray - classified as "moderate" risk of developing cancer, as in 1 in 1000 to 1 in 500.

      In this context of course none of this hardly matters - the Google driver isn't going to be spending an year there, and they're certainly not going to "internalize" most of that radiation. But it's very valid point for the prospect of people returning to Namie - the dose rates measured are taken at around waist height height where alpha and beta rays hardly even reach, indicating only external gamma ray dose. Those dose rates tell nothing about people who live, bathe and breathe in that isotope-soup. But currently, nobody lives in Namie and it's not know when, if ever, that can even be considered.

  4. Direct link by Raven737 · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Direct link by SternisheFan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't make fun of the American kid. At least he realized that WW2 happened in the past.

      You have a good point about our education system today. I recently saw a History Channel show about a veteran crewman from the Enola Gay bomber who gave speeches of his experience to American schoolkids. He said in one high school one student thanked him for his service in "World War Eleven" (WWII).

  5. Ghostery highscores... by Cow+Jones · · Score: 4, Informative

    The linked page on businessweek.com contains no less than 13 trackers:

    ChartBeat
    Disqus
    DoubleClick
    Dynamic Logic
    Facebook Connect
    ForeSee
    Google Adsense
    Google Analytics
    Krux Digital
    New Relic
    ScoreCard Research Beacon
    Taboola
    Twitter Button

    --

    Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari