Slashdot Mirror


Boston Cops Go Undercover Online To Crack Down on Concerts

Boston Police, according to an article at Slate, are engaging in a strange use of social media to fight crime. Or at least, to stop raucous music from disturbing the city. As the Slate writer says, "While police departments have been using social media to investigate for years, its use in such seemingly trivial crimes would be rather chilling, if these efforts didn’t seem so laughably inept."

229 comments

  1. What a waste by PapayaSF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, I can see why cops go undercover to prevent murders and bank robberies and such, but to head off noise complaints? Is there some reason why simply to responding to noise complaints isn't enough? Are there no longer any murders, rapes, and robberies in Boston to investigate or prevent? What a waste.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:What a waste by ShaunC · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a lot easier to get paid to sit at a desk and troll Facebook all day.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    2. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Murders and bank robberies represent very little in terms of crimes that could be prevented by undercover work(just see how many homicides are unplanned and spontaneous), and if the police focused solely on those crimes you suggest, it would leave people with a lot of concerns unaddressed and the crimes you're concerned about wouldn't be solved any more quickly. Turns out that more cops doesn't necessarily help solve a crime faster, and it turns out that police departments are multi-tasking and multi-threaded operations.

      I've got plenty of beefs with police operations, but there are some criticisms that don't measure up.

    3. Re:What a waste by Seumas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My first thought is that, who cares about a concert? They certainly don't seem to give a fuck about the assholes on their bikes with the modified mufflers going past my house that you can hear from two miles away and they don't give the slightest fuck at the retarded kids driving past with their music so loud that the bass rattles every window in the house and wakes everyone up dozens of times per day, 24x7.

    4. Re:What a waste by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A few simple questions to ask.

      1) in what neighborhoods are these proactive activities being conducted?

      2) what demographics specifically are benefitted by this malappropriation of resources?

      Consider how the Kennedys managed to halt the cape windfarm project buildout for decades, because they didn't want to see any windmills from their summer homes.

      Now... consider: "Martha's Vineyard + roudy teenagers with loud music", interrupting their wealthy, well to do lifestyles. (Yes, I know MV is not in boston. I am pointing at the stereotype.)

      It isn't hard for me to see this kind of thing happening, if "Mr Kennedy is being disturbed by all those rave parties down the street."

      The issue isn't that cracking down on rave parties has more merit than cracking down on rape, armed robbery, kidnappings, etc. It is that "the wishes of wealthy and influential citizens" are more important than those things.

      Just something to think about.

    5. Re:What a waste by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know about that. I used Facebook for a few days, once, and having to scroll through the endless inane shit (even of people you know) is enough to make you want to use your service revolver on yourself.

    6. Re:What a waste by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Right so, maybe the real answer is we have long since reached the point of diminishing returns on enforcement and its time to.... stop hiring so many cops, and give them the opportunity to retrain for useful jobs?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    7. Re:What a waste by Shoten · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, I can see why cops go undercover to prevent murders and bank robberies and such, but to head off noise complaints? Is there some reason why simply to responding to noise complaints isn't enough? Are there no longer any murders, rapes, and robberies in Boston to investigate or prevent? What a waste.

      These are the chuckleheads who found lite-brites with pictures of Mooninites (from Aqua Teen Hunger Force) around the city, and treated them like some kind of nuclear bomb with a ticking clock.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    8. Re:What a waste by danomac · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I read this and thought this was for the [older?] cops that can't be on active street duty for whatever reason. They sit at a desk and work.

    9. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason for the cops to sit on their brains and not appear in public.

    10. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s.petry posting AC so I can mod. I agree with this line of thought, but will add that it's not only the rave parties. How about the teen garage band? Growing up, I played the drums in many small bands. Those kids pay the same price as the rave party, and don't have the same intentions.

    11. Re:What a waste by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bingo! I've been called in to fix and upgrade computers for the cops in my area and it always amazed me how much time they just waste doing dumb shit on the PC, but hell I've found that is true of pretty much any government org. There is one secretary at the county clerks office I honestly am hoping will break soon since she hasn't been in in a year and I'm curious to see what amount of time she has wasted in Freecell to date, last time I worked on her maybe 3 year old PC she had something like 10,000 hours in Freecell, just nuts.

      But this isn't something new, cops like to say they "work online" as it sounds cooler and they don't have to leave the AC and the donuts. I ran a chat board for PC problems in the 90s when that whole "to catch a predator" shit became popular and I don't know how many times I had to threaten to file harassment charges because of cops talking dirty on the board. I finally asked a few of them "WTF makes you think a board with such stimulating topics like "No sound in Win95" and "Can't find a printer driver WinNT" is gonna be the place to pretend to be jailbait?" and they came right out and said pretty much all the social boards were already being trolled by cops, so they were just picking random places that weren't already being trolled.

      So even back then you had cops doing shit that was completely fucking pointless, but they could tell their boss "hey we are working online" and get paid to sit on their asses. This is what happens when you have zero oversight as I'm sure the people of Boston would rather have safer streets and less muggings and rapes but then they'd have to get up, go to the car, actually drive around...that is like work folks, can't have that.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the police even show up if you do make a noise complaint?

    13. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True, but drug dealers are a better target for these agents and I'd be willing to bet that I can find illegal drugs in Boston.

    14. Re:What a waste by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...what amount of time she has wasted in Freecell to date, last time I worked on her maybe 3 year old PC she had something like 10,000 hours in Freecell, just nuts.

      Considering a typical working years is roughly 1,500-1,600 hours a year, accounting for less than half the hours spent on Freecell, I guess she must have had a lot of overtime and work-weekends.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    15. Re:What a waste by Wookact · · Score: 2

      She would have had to spend 9 hours a day for three years to hit that number. That includes weekends and holidays.

    16. Re:What a waste by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Funny

      just leaving it on 24/7. I guess she just wants to screw around with the Big Brother system they have since they can see how many hours freecell or a browser has been online - so if they start complaining she can say that they should pay for the overtime since according to their calculations she has worked 12 years in the past 3(totalling the time for office, freecell and couple of other windows that have been open 24/7).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    17. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who only works 1,600 hours a year? Nobody in my department does less than 2,800 a year. Accounting for lunch and the like 10,000 hours in three years is about right for a program that is always open in the background. I easily put 2,000 hours in eve at home per year just for having it up and chatting with people while doing everyday chores.

    18. Re:What a waste by emilper · · Score: 1

      probably easier to get overtime pay if you work "undercover" ...

    19. Re:What a waste by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      there's every reason to criticize these assholes.

      I mean, WHAT THE FUCK? it's illegal to have house parties in boston now? WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK? you can't ask some guy with a guitar to come over to your house and some other guys to listen? WHO THE FUCK LOBBIED FOR THIS? the bar owners association? mobsters who get a cut from bouncers?

      I mean, it's clearly different from just being ordnance against making a racket - if it was that then it would be reactive.
      And this needs cops who could be patrolling street corners known for dope selling and muggings. or you know going to places where actual realtime noise complaints are made from. but I suppose it's safer and easier to just bully some hipsters.

      if anything these guys should be - and probably as we speak are - trolled to going to joke meetings they have no right to disperse. wear togas while waiting for them to show up.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    20. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murders and bank robberies represent very little in terms of crimes that could be prevented by undercover work(just see how many homicides are unplanned and spontaneous), and if the police focused solely on those crimes you suggest, it would leave people with a lot of concerns unaddressed and the crimes you're concerned about wouldn't be solved any more quickly. Turns out that more cops doesn't necessarily help solve a crime faster, and it turns out that police departments are multi-tasking and multi-threaded operations.

      I've got plenty of beefs with police operations, but there are some criticisms that don't measure up.

      Dude, I can find pretty much any drug of choice from a random stranger, a cheap hooker, or someone under-age to find a buyer for booze with a few hours of looking. Maybe if these cops actually got off their lazy asses and walked a beat for a while they could actually get something done. Sitting behind a computer claiming to be "undercover" is a bullshit excuse to get paid for basically doing nothing useful at all.

    21. Re:What a waste by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It's a start.

      We really need to get back to a situation where if you can hear the radio inside someone's car from inside your house, they should be cited.

      If you can hear the music from inside a bar inside your house, the bar should be cited.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    22. Re:What a waste by alen · · Score: 2

      a legit concert will be held in a place with the right permit,certified by the fire department for that many people and will have enough security. cops even moonlight doing security for legit concerts

      if you hold a concert in an area where it will bother people and the place isn't zoned for a concert it deserves to be shut down. people have a right to relax at home with no noise

    23. Re:What a waste by memnock · · Score: 2

      40 hr/week X 52 weeks = 2080. Two weeks for vacation leaves 2000 hours of work in a year. I'm not sure where you got your estimate from, but it hardly describes any regular work year I've known.

    24. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eve? Then you mean cyboring, not chatting.

    25. Re:What a waste by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They could do, you know, what police used to do before they all became lazy. Back in the day we called it 'Walking a beat'. You know we'd go and assign them a neighbor and they could direct lost kids home, help old ladies cross the street, etc. All sorts of little things they did made neighborhoods want to have a cop around, rather then never wanting to see them. Not that there weren't bad cops back then, there were, but even the bad ones tended to do some good... Now 'innocent' people don't trust them and they only seem to do crap like this story....

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    26. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Will you please change the subject? Talking about how many hours a year we spend at work is about as depressing a topic as can be imagined.

    27. Re:What a waste by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      Yeah, OK, but I'm not objecting to shutting down noisy concerts that are bothering people. I'm objecting to using undercover cops to find out about the concerts ahead of time, before anyone complains. It's like having plainclothes cops follow people leaving McDonald's with takeout, just in case they later litter with their burger wrappers. It's too much enforcement for too minor a crime.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    28. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like sue her for fraud since she was getting paid to work but was playing solitaire instead...

    29. Re:What a waste by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      You've clearly never had people living next door who blast their car boom boxes at 3AM.

    30. Re:What a waste by alen · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The whole point is the concerts are being held in areas where the zoning laws prohibit concerts

      Noise complaints are for the once in a while noise from neighbors
      The cops are ok on this because these are organized operations to conduct unlawful activity. Not as bad as the mafia and real organized crime, but same concept

    31. Re:What a waste by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Depends on how much money you have.

    32. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it's a fucking indie show at someone's house. I mean where do you draw the line? If I decide to put on some music when I have friends over periodically are the cops going to try to worm into my social network to see when I'm going to have people over next?

      I care when my neighbors are being too damn loud, but I'm more inclined to tell them rather than passive-aggressively having the police harass them when there are legitimate crimes out there. If you're allowed to have the police harass people who are doing little harm except a loud show, then I would like them to sit at every on-ramp in King County, WA to catch all the people illegally using the HOV lanes at the on-ramp.

    33. Re:What a waste by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      They could do, you know, what police used to do before they all became lazy. Back in the day we called it 'Walking a beat'.

      Reality is, it's not the cops. It's the chiefs of police that caused that one, back in the 70's and 80's a lot of them got it in their head that it was better to have a "roving presence" then to have a guy on the ground walking and talking with people. Well, I was planning to go into policing until I broke my back, no such luck on that now can't complete the physical components to pass here in Canada. There are call codes for walking the beat still, but there's still a bloody stigma to it because of that.

      Gets even worse because the politically correct nannies don't want you doing it either, unless "that's your job" because you "might not be trained for it..." uh right there guys, we all go to the same police college here in Ontario(or your individual province). It is changing, slowly, but it's probably going to take another 20 years. Doesn't help either that services go out of their way to not allowing officers to patrol areas where they live.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    34. Re:What a waste by Alsee · · Score: 1

      ya, the police here are like totally knuckleheads them moonites are da bomb and they should have totally left them up instead of harrazing regular kids like us

      oh heay do yaz have teh address for tonights house concert my bff isnt answering her mobile phone and i cant read the address she faxed me kthanxbai i appreciate the 411 loveya oxoxoxox

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    35. Re:What a waste by HornWumpus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You draw the line at a PA.

      Instrument amps are loud enough for backyard concerts. Louder won't make you better.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    36. Re:What a waste by jklovanc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lets take a look at a couple of scenarios;
      1. A cop on the internet spending a couple of hours to find a DIY event, a couple of cops to show up and tell them not to run it and a couple of cops to show up on the appointed time to verify it didn't happen.
      Total manpower usage 4 hours.
      2, Respond to a noise complaint at midnight to find 100 drunken punk rockers at a DIY event. That would require the following to break up;
      * at least 10 cops for 2 to 3 hours
      * Transport to jail for at least 5-10 idiots who start fights
      * booking time,
      * court timetime,
      * public service administration
      Total time a couple hundred hours.
      Which would you think is a better use of resources? Preventing a loud party is much simpler than stopping one in progress.

    37. Re:What a waste by sjames · · Score: 1

      But if they don't bust up the parties, there might be dancing !

    38. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I'd rather go for decriminalization, thank you very much.

      Or let's go after the real criminals in pharmaceuticals. You know, the ones sitting in penthouses, not working the streets.

    39. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, this is a complete waste of taxpayer resources. Why waste time searching for the possible location of a possible private party? If a party happens and the neighbors get annoyed THEY WILL CALL AND TELL THE COPS WHERE IT IS.

      Besides, isn't creating a phoney facebook page a violation of the TOS? Police officers deliberately committing a Federal felony (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) in order to catch some possible misdemeanor noise violations seems malicious abuse of police power.

    40. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I don't want any cop walking around my neighborhood. They're more likely to shoot the fuck out of somebody than they are to prevent any crime.

    41. Re:What a waste by Shoten · · Score: 1

      ya, the police here are like totally knuckleheads them moonites are da bomb and they should have totally left them up instead of harrazing regular kids like us

      oh heay do yaz have teh address for tonights house concert my bff isnt answering her mobile phone and i cant read the address she faxed me kthanxbai i appreciate the 411 loveya oxoxoxox

      -

      Why, sure, dude...here it is! Just come on over...party starts at 4 PM on Friday.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    42. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe breaking up the parties before they start prevents the murders committed by annoyed neighbors?

    43. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " WHO THE FUCK LOBBIED FOR THIS?"
      Most likely the people who live nearby and have to get up in the morning to go to work to pay the mortgage/rent and feed and clothe the kids. Also these so called "parties" usually involve excessive alcohol consumption and use of illegal drugs.
      You do not have a right to party as loud and as long you may want.

    44. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40~50 years ago there were a lot more police per capita than now. That was back in the day when big businesses and super wealthy people actually paid a fair tax for doing business in this country.

    45. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now now, just calm down bro! I know as a young hip 18 year old kid you think loud music is a right outlined in the Constitution, but some of us -- real adults with real jobs and children to take care of -- actually NEED to sleep.

      You see we have careers, and work all day. Then we come home for some much needed rest and to spend time with our family. We do this practically every day of the week, even Saturdays! Crazy, I know. So you can imagine, it's tough when a bunch of pot-smoking retards around your age insist that they need to blast music as loud as possible, louder than any normal level you'd listen to music at, and get crazy and fight in their front yard and keep the whole neighborhood awake, because they are young and rule the world and won't live to be 30 and YOLO, etc.

      These wild partying kids have no jobs, no responsibilities, no children, and their parents clean up and pay for them. But as an adult, nobody takes are of us. We take care of ourselves! So we really do need sleep, and we've spent good money -- not your Mom and Dad's money, our own _real_ money -- to get a home in a decent neighborhood that should be relatively free of pointless noise.

      I know this is confusing and doesn't make a lot of sense. Someday when you are a grown-up adult with adult responsibilities, a job, and a family to take care of, it will all make sense. I would hope at some point today you'll take that joint out of your mouth, stumble across the empty beer cans strewn about your floor, and go outside to observe what real people are actually like in reality. They are working, and they are tired. Is a peaceful sleep too much for them to ask? I think not.

      You'll understand someday! I was a crazy kid like you who liked loud music once too, and then I grew up and gave up on my childish, immature, selfish, self-centered ways. So turn that noise down, and realize the Boston police are trying to do what's right for the hard working citizens with real adult responsibilities. Just sayin'.

    46. Re:What a waste by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Frankly I wouldn't be surprised if she had freecell on from the second she started the system, I've noticed a lot of the secretaries will often have a game of some sort running in the background. Maybe their work is start/stop enough to justify it, hell if I was gonna find out as I have NO desire to hang out in places like county clerks and the DMV, but I noticed most of the systems from there had high times on the card games.

      Hell maybe clerks just really really REALLY like their freecell, hell if i know, i'm just the guy folks call when stuff breaks. It would be an interesting study, how many hours of freecell are played in government offices VS private business, with it further broken down by function and dept...I wonder if I can get a grant?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    47. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for giving me flashbacks of that horrible day, you insensitive clod!

    48. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm one of those residents who complain about noise (not in Boston though). I know there's much worse crime, but when I pay thousands of dollars in property tax a year and a cop never shows up does get annoying. Or when they brush me off by suggesting to me to just go over and talk to the neighbor to keep it down myself.

      Thursday nights are the worse, because unlike them, I still have to work on Friday. Oh, and I still have to wake up early, while they have some pizza delivery job.

    49. Re:What a waste by hairyfish · · Score: 2

      And when they walk the beat, perhaps they could not do it in full military riot squad garb. I'm not sure what the uniform code is here, but cops seem to have taken a fancy to the combat boot/pants/vest look, rather than the more customer friendly shirt and pants like the old days. A bit if PR would go a long way to helping improve the situation IMO

    50. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except these aren't just house parties, They are actual shows, they serve alcohol, they are trying to make money. It's not a party its a show and they are being done in residential neighborhoods. You think you know what your talking about but until one happens on your block you don't know what your talking about. Imagine a club letting out at your front door, with all the drunks being loud and starting fights.

    51. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jamaica Plains is not your uptight east coast wealthy neighborhood. Sorry but your reasoning is faulty. This has nothing to do with the Kennedy class, this is about people not wanting a club letting out in their front yard. I for one have no problem with the police proactively stopping these parties, it's much better then having them come and break it up.

    52. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I live in the area, and they have always come when I have had to call.

    53. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it's a club opening up in your neighborhood selling alcohol. These are shows, not parties you can just crash, they are money making enterprises that are ignoring the laws to make larger profits. If you haven't had one in your neighborhood then please take an objective look before you comment, It really is more then a noise complain. It's a lot of drunks and fights breaking out and everything you get when a club lets out, just on your front yard.

    54. Re:What a waste by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      This assumes that every DIY event results in a noise complaint, which is not a given.

    55. Re:What a waste by mallyn · · Score: 1
      Folks:

      First thing; they have got to get off the darn donuts! :(

      I just got royally chewed out big time by my doctor to stay off of donuts from now on because of my high LDL.

      I have never been reamed out like this before. He told me that I was killing myself by eating donuts!

      I suggest that if they stop eating donuts, they just might get more energy to do more than just sit around.

      --
      Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
    56. Re:What a waste by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try actually reading the post that you're replying to. You know, bits like:

      And this needs cops who could be patrolling street corners known for dope selling and muggings. or you know going to places where actual realtime noise complaints are made from.

    57. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's a club opening up in your neighborhood selling alcohol. These are shows, not parties you can just crash, they are money making enterprises that are ignoring the laws to make larger profits. If you haven't had one in your neighborhood then please take an objective look before you comment, It really is more then a noise complain. It's a lot of drunks and fights breaking out and everything you get when a club lets out, just on your front yard.

      Does anyone think of calling the cops when oner of these disruptive events occurs? Seems to me it would be a whole lot more effective to have neighbors report these disturbances than to have cops trolling Facebook or whatever to find them..

    58. Re:What a waste by mallyn · · Score: 1
      Well, if you enjoy your work, then it is not work and is not depressing.

      What do you define as work?

      Charlie Brown calls work the crab grass of life.

      I happen to enjoy what I am doing. I love to solve problems and clean up other people's messes. It gives me a great ego boost.

      When I am done with that, I then do more of what you call work to creat my artistic jewelry and clothing.

      --
      Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
    59. Re:What a waste by mallyn · · Score: 1

      Great post! Well said!!!

      --
      Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
    60. Re:What a waste by mallyn · · Score: 2
      This whole thread has introduced me to a new definition of the word 'house concert'!

      I have been to house concerts here in Portland, Oregon and they are **far** different that what is alleged here

      One house concert was a string quartet in somone's living room that started at 7 PM and ended at 9 PM. You could not hear anything from outside.

      The other house concert was a small chorus (un-amplified) with a baby grand piano. It was also in a living room. And you could not even hear it from the front walkway of the home, let alone the neighbors. It was over at about 9:30 PM

      The third house concert was a Christmas carol sing along where the family invited many of the neighbors over dessert and singing. It ran from about 8 PM to 10 PM. You could barely hear anything from the front walkway.

      And Boston wants to ban these?????

      --
      Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
    61. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11 says you are wrong...

    62. Re:What a waste by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Sorry but a punk rock concert usually is pretty noisy.

    63. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already prevent concerts by shutting down public transportation at 1am

    64. Re:What a waste by hedwards · · Score: 1

      You get 2 weeks? The only time I've ever had that much time off, nominally, has been when I've been teaching, and even then it's not real time off because I have to prepare lessons and keep up on the literature. Tons of jobs out there give you less than a week, assuming you get any at all.

    65. Re:What a waste by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I think being a receptionist tends to be one of those hurry up and wait jobs, where they need somebody there in case something happens. In which case, it's far better to just let them screw around on something like that, which isn't likely to result in a lawsuit than staring into thin air. I've worked at places like that which don't permit anything but work, and it drives you nuts, slowly but surely, until you're contemplating if anybody would miss you if you just left the room for a few hours.

    66. Re:What a waste by hedwards · · Score: 2

      "Concert"? You're one of those narcs, aren't you?

    67. Re:What a waste by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Depends where you live, the cops around here went from dressing like bobbies to dressing in a more contemporary style, the type you'd see all over the place in the '80s, and they haven't really felt the need to update the uniform much since then.

    68. Re:What a waste by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The BPD was the only one to flip out over it, and when it turned out to be nothing, the prosecuted over it.

      There was no explosive charge, nor was there anything about the displays that would have permitted there to be any explosive charge of note there.

      I remember years back when a local installation artist parked a huge truck with "da bomb" painted on it, amongst other things, the local police department did shut things down pretty good, but you're talking about a car, which could easily contain hundreds of pounds of explosives, versus a display that couldn't even contain a half pound of explosive in it.

      Other cities didn't have any trouble recognizing the lack of threat there.

    69. Re:What a waste by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      No, I just happen to have a decent vocabulary.

    70. Re:What a waste by hedwards · · Score: 1

      No, but it will make your audience deafer, so they won't realize how bad you are.

    71. Re:What a waste by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Clearly you don't if you're not using the correct word.

    72. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Boston wants to ban these?????

      This whole thread has introduced me to a new definition of the word 'house concert'!

      You found the dots, now connect them...

    73. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not so much following random people around as watching an area that had litter repeated litter complaints to see who might be doing it. My issue is not so much with cops watching a public area or for announcements of things that have produced a lot of complaints before, assuming they have nothing better to do. In a bigger city with budget issues, they probably do have better things to be doing. Although in smaller places, I've seen cops sent to watch areas for littering and dumping problems when it becomes problematic enough...

    74. Re:What a waste by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Just using the same language as the submitter. Would you call it a gig (which is slang for concert)?

    75. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a show, the point I was making is that you're not using the correct register, which is an obvious callout to somebody that isn't really involved in any of this.

    76. Re:What a waste by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Lets take a look at a couple of scenarios;
      1. A cop on the internet spending a couple of hours to find a DIY event, then wastes man hours busting a crime that never happened.
      Total manpower wasted on a non crime 4 hours.
      2, Respond to a noise complaint at midnight to find 100 drunken punk rockers at a DIY event.
      Lots of time spent on an actual crime
      Preventing a crime is much simpler than stopping one in progress. But preventing a non crime is unconstitutional.

    77. Re:What a waste by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      there's every reason to criticize these assholes.

      I mean, WHAT THE FUCK? it's illegal to have house parties in boston now?

      No, it is illegal to have LOUD parties, or park illegally, or give alcohol to minors, or a few other things that were ALREADY illegal.

    78. Re:What a waste by chrismcb · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do not have a right to party as loud and as long you may want.

      You DO have the right to party as long as you want. But yeah you can be loud, use illegal drugs, park illegally, serve minors... But how about we bust people AFTER they commit the crime, not before they MIGHT commit a crime.

    79. Re:What a waste by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      What do you define as work?

      Work is getting somebody to give you money to do something for them. It's something one does to pay the bills.

      A hobby is "working" on something that you enjoy, like artistic stuff. You may get money for it, but it won't pay the bills.

      Once your hobby pays the bills, hey, that's your work! And your hobby is then being a sysadmin or whatever.

      sr

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    80. Re:What a waste by davydagger · · Score: 1

      meanwhile, elsewhere in boston

      Murder:
      google of "murder boston 2013"
      https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=murder+boston+2013&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gbv=1&sei=H4VWUaKhBcfF4APfqICoCQ

      http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2013_murders_in_boston/

      Rape:
      google of "rape boston 2013"
      https://www.google.com/search?q=rape+boston+2013&btnG=Search&client=ubuntu&channel=fs&oe=utf-8&sei=a4VWUay8N8-l4AObm4C4Bg&gbv=2

      http://www.boston.com/metrodesk/2013/01/14/boston-police-officer-charged-with-rape/9in8IjPbZJk3KZqibhG8nJ/story.html
      http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/03/rape_suspect_now_accused_in_five_attacks_in_boston
      http://www.theolympian.com/2013/03/22/2474165/two-accused-of-forcible-rape-at.html

      Arson:
      google of "arson google 2013"
      https://www.google.com/search?q=rape+boston+2013&btnG=Search&client=ubuntu&channel=fs&oe=utf-8&sei=a4VWUay8N8-l4AObm4C4Bg&gbv=2#hl=en&client=ubuntu&channel=fs&gbv=2&sclient=psy-ab&q=arson+boston+2013&oq=arson+boston+2013&gs_l=serp.3...83876.87618.0.87920.13.9.4.0.0.1.225.1405.1j6j2.9.0...0.0...1c.1.7.psy-ab.a-RFyqFMeYw&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.44442042,d.dmg&fp=9e0d914065f6d06f&biw=1211&bih=715

      http://www.boston.com/news/nation/2013/03/25/prosecutor-conn-man-confessed-deadly-arson/1YMsDV9Vf1UNcsTBKU6FyJ/story.html
      http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/01/da_arson_suspects_held_may_be_linked_24_fires
      http://www.boston.com/metrodesk/2013/03/27/four-alarm-fire-lynn-apartment-building-was-case-arson/piAyV6p8VoaXkuz9xHRgVL/story.html
      http://www.boston.com/metrodesk/2013/03/27/four-alarm-fire-lynn-apartment-building-was-case-arson/piAyV6p8VoaXkuz9xHRgVL/story.html

      I personally want to congradulate the boston police on money well spent. Serious rock'n'roll criminals have been punished, and the city is safe. There is no possible way at all that the money could have been better spent.

    81. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of free time with nothing to do requires innovating responsibilities to insure job security and prevent budget cutbacks in the following year. If it's extraordinarily bad then conditions may require extraordinary measures. Hopefully this lightweight non-violent stuff is as far as they'll want to go.

    82. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you have to share that listening session with every house in a 500 yard radius? Because that's what usually happens. And it's not a guitar but the usual 10hz at 145db crap!

    83. Re:What a waste by houghi · · Score: 1

      you can't ask some guy with a guitar to come over to your house and some other guys to listen? WHO THE FUCK LOBBIED FOR THIS? the bar owners association? mobsters who get a cut from bouncers?

      It is the last one. They are called the MAFIAA.
      Playing music for tens of people who do not pay to listen to it? This means the musicians are not being payed.
      What? The musicians playing at those venues are being payed and are not a member of the system? Well, there you go. You do not want those musicians being payed who, uhm, well, paying those that are not, uh, the rest that are, well .... IT IS BAD and against America, so we must stop it at all costs.
      We have the law on our side. We have bought and payed them fair and square. It is ours. If you want your own laws, buy them yourself. Laws are not like music. When you buy a law, it is yours. When you buy music, it is still ours.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    84. Re:What a waste by 19061969 · · Score: 1

      Except that as a tax-payer, the GP is actually paying the cops' salaries.

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
    85. Re:What a waste by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Is it possible she doesn't turn the game off while doing other things, but just leaves it running in the background? It's not like Freecell is that great a resource hog.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    86. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cops must have plenty of crack - so they can seriously crack down on crime?

    87. Re:What a waste by jklovanc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sorry but in most cities holding a large party in a residential area without a permit is a crime.

    88. Re:What a waste by DasSquid · · Score: 1
      Y'know I had to read through your post twice to be sure, and yes I'm sure that I am quite offended.

      Are you saying that because a person organizes a wild party now and then that they can't be family people with full time jobs/careers? True, I'll concede that I'm single and have no children and I understand how that it would be very difficult to organize a party under those circumstances, however I find your line of reasoning highly dubious that just because I like to organize a party in my own home where I have 50-100 people over for a good ol' night on a weekend that I'm a broke bum without a job. And the people who voted you up to +5 Insightful, blows my mind.

      From the age of 26-28 I organized some fantastic parties that will never be forgotten and made many excellent friendships that persist to this day, I'd party until the morning, wake up and clean the house, cook breakfast for whomever stayed the evening and hell sometimes I even went to the gym if I had the time. If you Party responsibly, you can Party Hard, not piss off your neighbours, follow the laws of the land and get to know your neighbours so that if they do have a problem with the noise they are not afraid to approach you and ask you nicely to tone it down a bit, of which everyone at my parties were more than happy to do.

      Then again, I lived in Australia at the time where we were not afraid of our own shadows.

    89. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gig isn't slang for concert - it's slang for "job," which, when applied to music performance by a musician, means "job," but which, when applied to music performance by a non-musician, means "a single performance at a single venue." The right word for what you have in mind might be "jam" as in "jam session," or a group of musicians getting together to play and have fun. But I suspect this is actually more about "raves" and unlicensed concerts than about the student parties in Allston or Brighton.

    90. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't any Kennedy's in Brighton, you moron - haven't been since the 60s. These are gypsy raves in the student ghetto.

    91. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people live in first-world countries where (even non-union) workers have rights.

    92. Re:What a waste by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Or you could live in some European countries where you get 6 or more weeks.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    93. Re:What a waste by Gabrill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh no, not at all. They merely want to make every free act a gray area in court, so they can selectively prosecute whomever they wish.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    94. Re:What a waste by karnal · · Score: 1

      In most neighborhoods there are noise laws for this. In mine, if a car can be clearly heard from 50 feet there's a fine involved. Of course, police can't be everywhere.

      I'm one of those guys with a loud system - inside of the car. Outside? No rattles and less noise than the engine idling. I feel no need to advertise my music to everyone, and I learned a long time ago that most everyone doesn't care to hear it anyways.

      --
      Karnal
    95. Re:What a waste by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      As another poster pointed out, it takes a lot LESS police resources to prevent a noisy party than break up a noisy show.

      Prevent: 1 cop online 2 hours, 2 cops visit say don't do it, another 2 hours.

      Break up party: 10 to 20 cops for 5 hours to break it up. More cops to process everyone arrested. Judges etc... to process bail etc... and lots more I don't know about.

      On first reading I thought it seemed an odd thing to spend police resources on, but if these are loud, large, punk shows that disturb many people then I can see it being a smart use of police resources.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    96. Re:What a waste by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      The demand for lower taxes killed beat cops. It is very expensive to hire enough cops to do that.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    97. Re:What a waste by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Uh. teachers in the US almost always get at least 10 - 12 weeks PTO per year that they refuse to count as PTO and then another 2 - 6 that they do count.

    98. Re:What a waste by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      "fair tax" The to 10% of wage earners in the US collectively pay over 70% of the income tax in the US.

      I hear many people, usually those paying a negative income tax rate or the politicians playing to them, complaining that "the rich aren't paying their fair share" but they will never define exactly what the fair share should be.

      I've even seen polls where the same people agree that the rich aren't paying enough and then when asked what percentage, collectively, the top 10% should be paying the usual response is 40% - 50%.

      So, yes, the rich don't actually pay "their fair share". They pay it and more, at least, according the the average US resident when given actual numbers instead of "Look, they have more than you. Pull out your envy and jealousy and get to work."

    99. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well since these are being done in residential areas it has a higher then average chance to cause a noise complaint. And we should just turn a blind eye to promoters ignoring the laws?

    100. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is about teaching the young they live in a police state now and dont even mess around or we will get you before you even commit a crime.

    101. Re:What a waste by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Also these so called "parties" usually involve excessive alcohol consumption and use of illegal drugs.

      So? No one really agrees with the drug war, right?

      You do not have a right to party as loud and as long you may want.

      You do not have a right to voice your disagreement with government policies except if your voice is as quiet as a whisper.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    102. Re:What a waste by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      You'll understand someday!

      Must be nice to be able to see into the future and to instantly know the ages of people you've never met.

      That said, you'll understand why you're 100% wrong when you're older.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    103. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point is the concerts are being held in areas where the zoning laws prohibit concerts

      "It's too much enforcement for too minor a crime." I still agree with him. Anyone who thinks this is worthy of sending out undercover cops over is an imbecile.

    104. Re:What a waste by westlake · · Score: 1

      They could, you know, what police used to do before they all became lazy. Back in the day we called it 'Walking a beat'.

      This was back in the day when you willing to pay for such services. The manning requirements are huge.

    105. Re:What a waste by Reziac · · Score: 1

      A crime or an infraction??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    106. Re:What a waste by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Methinks that's more to the point... it's like road checkpoints, an excuse to poke their noses in, just in case you MIGHT have pot in the trunk, or in the case of house parties, meth in your bathtub.

      I doubt noise complaints are more than the excuse, just as drunk driving is the excuse for road checkpoints. Both are fishing expeditions using an occasional real problem as the excuse to escalate a fishing expedition into an investigation.

      Methinks the drop in Real Crimes (per FBI stats) leaves cops with not enough to do *to justify their jobs*, so they're inventing new opportunities to Stop Crime.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    107. Re:What a waste by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Merely semantics as the police deal with both crimes and infractions.

    108. Re:What a waste by Holi · · Score: 1

      Well since they sell alcohol at these DIY shows that puts it right in the crime column.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    109. Re:What a waste by Holi · · Score: 1

      Well they are "busting" people, they are coming up and saying "we know you are going to have this event. Don't or we will close it down and arrest you"
      They are engaged in a preventative measure. So no one gets disturbed and no one gets arrested. It seems to be the best solution for all parties.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    110. Re:What a waste by Holi · · Score: 1

      Yes because 1 or 2 cops finding about one of these events and swinging by before it happens and stopping it quietly is so much less efficient then sending 10 or cops to the party to deal with 100 or so drunken idiots making a lot of noise.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    111. Re:What a waste by Holi · · Score: 1

      They are not "sending out undercover cops" they are scanning facebook using fake accounts then sending a uniformed cop over before the event to stop it from happening.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    112. Re:What a waste by Holi · · Score: 1

      And at that point you have upset an entire neighborhood and kept several residents up till late at night (you think it takes no time to break up a rowdy show?). This is a preventative measure that deals with these non violent infractions before they become a problem, it sounds like a very efficient and low cost way to deal with a growing problem.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    113. Re:What a waste by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And as I have pointed out in response to that other pointer, not every party is a noisy show.

    114. Re:What a waste by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      We shouldn't be writing silly laws like that in the first place (it should be illegal to be noisy, not to hold parties). But if we do end up with such laws, then yes, the best way to contain their stupidity is to at least selectively enforce them with a modicum of common sense.

    115. Re:What a waste by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good, but why would you buy a house in Boston with that attitude? Move out to Newton and you'll have all the quiet space you need. They actually have a functioning school district too!

      I mean, effectively this is just a problem of sortation -- the idiot 30-somethings need to be sorted out and kept separate from the responsible 40-somethings. I don't think you get any particular joy from shutting them down, so don't assume that they get any kick out of waking your ass up at all hours of the night.

      Seems easy enough to imagine that we could all get along a lot better if we let each neighborhood vote on whether they want to impose a quiet-time ordinance or not, instead of imposing a one-size-fits-all solution on the entire city. Everyone could then chose which area suits their own preferences -- amazing how much work the concept of free choice does!

    116. Re:What a waste by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      having to scroll through the endless inane shit (even of people you know) is enough to make you want to use your service revolver on yourself.

      Why would police officers assigned to this duty be required to sign out service revolvers for a day in the office?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    117. Re:What a waste by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      just because YOU think it MIGHT be loud, doesnt mean it will be. so for every 4 hours a cop spends wasting time looking for a loud party to break up (before it has even happened) REAL crime is happening in his district. be it drug sales or muggings, real crime is happening.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    118. Re:What a waste by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      and unless some crime takes place (minus drinking excessively and the possible drug use) it doesnt hurt anyone else, and as such the cops should worry about something else. As a neighbor, why do you care what I do unless i start bothering you directly? if i have 40 cars in my yard, but im not loud enough for you to hear us, why the fuck would you care?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    119. Re:What a waste by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      The issue is, unless someone makes a complaint, who is to say said party was "loud"?? we are talking about breaking up parties before they happen, that is the issue at hand

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    120. Re:What a waste by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      maybe in canada (based on your name) but in america, lower taxes have nothing to do with the cops on hand.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    121. Re:What a waste by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      except we dont have pre-crime laws, and as such we dont know whatis going to happen at these parties. It is not cool to break up a party for noise, before we know there is noise, what next we arrest people for buying powerful computers because they might start hacking or DDosing websites?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    122. Re:What a waste by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I dont see the difference... Either way an officer is stoping something before it happens, not knowing exactly what is going to happen. I dont like that.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    123. Re:What a waste by psiclops · · Score: 1

      one doesn't need to physically have a service revolver next to them to want to use it on themselves.

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    124. Re:What a waste by psiclops · · Score: 1

      citation needed.

      the time and address of the next concert you are going to should be sufficient.

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    125. Re:What a waste by psiclops · · Score: 1

      These wild partying kids have no jobs, no responsibilities, no children, and their parents clean up and pay for them.

      you don't actually know anyone in any music scene do you?

      and go outside to observe what real people are actually like in reality. They are working, and they are tired.

      you should do the same. here's a hint. lots of 'real' adults with 'real' jobs drink. a lot. they also take drugs. sometimes a lot. they then go to work the next day and function perfectly fine as this is kind of their natural state. unless you're in some incredibly tiny organisation there are people that you know at your work that do this too.
      you live in your bubble. other people live in theirs. no one's is more real than anyone elses.

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    126. Re:What a waste by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Why would police officers assigned to this duty be required to sign out service revolvers for a day in the office?

      Desk pop.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    127. Re:What a waste by psiclops · · Score: 1

      I've even seen polls where the same people agree that the rich aren't paying enough and then when asked what percentage, collectively, the top 10% should be paying the usual response is 40% - 50%.

      well considering the top 10% of US income earners earn somewhere between 40 and 50% percent of the income and have over 50% of the wealth. i'd say that 40 to 50% is lower than they should be paying - a lot of people who don't understand a progressive tax system would think it's about right,

      not sure if you meant 40 - 50% of their income or 40 - 50% of the nations total income tax. the above assumes the latter however i also agree with both.

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    128. Re: What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Low hanging fruit. If drugs are involved, they can do mass arrests, while a shooting only may net one individual.

      The state has an agreement with Corrections Corporation of America that they keep all prison beds at 90% full. This goes further to heed that contract than chasing bank robbers.

    129. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, fucking hipster. "music scene"? Fucking hilarious!

      You are a twentysomething kid or thirtysomething manchild who still parties and got offended because you realized you met the posters description of worthless trash.

      I hope you overdose, you'll make a worthless adult someday.

    130. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I like to organize a party in my own home where I have 50-100 people over for a good ol' night on a weekend"

      I absolutely guarantee you your neighbors HATED you for this. You are the typical kind of douche who says 'there's nothing wrong with having fun' as a mantra and an EXCUSE.

      Just re-read your own post. You are completely full of yourself. You know what a real neighbor does? He DOES NOT make so much noise that ANYBODY has to ask him to turn it down in the FIRST PLACE. You've already broken the golden rule by shitting on people first, and then adjusting your behavior (or _claiming_ you would) only after they have been inconvenienced.

      The biggest douches do exactly what you do. Then again, if you are an adult and still need to throw 100 people parties, you are a douche. Grow the fuck up. Oh wait, single, no children, haven't done anything with your life... I guess you need those parties, don't you? Must be lonely!

    131. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, I always take advice about how to behave in society properly from "ganjadude".

      Jesus Christ, are you serious? Go fuck yourself, you goddamn worthless stoner. People like myself pay taxes that go into rehab programs to help bums like you get your life back together. I fucking resent that any of my legally hard-earned money has to support some shitbag who has to self-medicate just to get through life.

      Why is it that assholes are always convinced their own music isn't loud? That your shit doesn't stink? That your fucking pot smoke can't be smelled?

      You are a dirty drugged up piece of shit, and yes, despite how unobtrusive you think you are, people around you fucking hate you. For your music, for your smell, and for your conceited attitude. Get a life.

    132. Re:What a waste by Druegan · · Score: 1

      "And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?"

    133. Re:What a waste by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      haha says the anon coward. Way to judge a book by its cover.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    134. Re:What a waste by Steve+Hamlin · · Score: 1

      Per the OECD, the "Average annual hours actually worked per worker" in the United States has been around 1,800 hours per year for the last decade. (1,787 in 2011)

      Source: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCode=ANHRS

    135. Re:What a waste by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I sometimes feel like drilling an oil well to China, but I don't do it when I don't have an oil rig under my control because I don't have an oil rig to drill to China with. However, when I am in control of an oil rig, I resist the temptation to drill to China because it's just not a terribly good idea.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    136. Re:What a waste by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Meaning "on the downhill slope to retirement"?

      But why, if they know they're going to be behind a desk all day, do they start their shift by going down to the armoury to sign out a weapon?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Y undercover? by markdavis · · Score: 4, Informative

    >"loud rock shows can, in fact, be a nuisance to neighbors, as many of the people who put the shows on will admit. "

    Of course they are. In fact, to many people (myself included), such noise in a residential area is not a "trivial crime" at all. But why is it necessary to go undercover? Isn't it easier to wait for a noise complaint, then sent units over to wherever it is and start issuing tickets??

    1. Re:Y undercover? by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Wait for the noise complaints and just show up to shut things down? That's no fun for the officers --- they don't get to spend their evening rocking out at the hottest parties while getting paid double-undercover-overtime.

    2. Re:Y undercover? by abigsmurf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having a couple of officers do undercover work to get the organisers is more efficient and effective then sending loads of officers to a concert, filling up the cells and having a high chance of the organisers getting away. It's also far more likely to discourage people from even attempting a show.

      Plus there's lots of stuff that goes with the concerts other than just noise; poor safety, drink driving, general vandalism to the area, all the stuff that licenced concerts have to plan for or try to prevent.

    3. Re:Y undercover? by fermion · · Score: 1
      The idea might be to warn of stop a violation before it happens. It might be that it will help the people who are doing this.

      There are many possibilities here. One is that these are young people who are simply testing limits as young people do. You know, racing down the road, as I saw two trucks labeled with stickers from our local redneck college, or drinking excessively, all to show they can act like badasses. The best case scenario is that nothing happens, the medium case is they off themselves and nothing happens any more, the worst case is they hurt other people. WIth these noise violations it mostly involves hurting other people. Kids can't sleep. Responsible adults still have to go to work the next morning. Cops coming in after the fact do not always help. In these cases it is better to show the young people that limits do exist.

      Another is they don't think rules apply to them. We see this in hazing situations. But unlike hazing where again only the willing participants are dead, this hurts other people. The authorities building a relationship with such people and explaining the rules and consequences help keep those other people from paying for the lack of responsibility. Again, responsible adults do have get kids to school, go to work, even on a saturday or sunday.

      And given the responses to this, it is clear that if the cops in fact are taking a pro active approach, and it is not clear if they are or are not, to explain the laws and consequences, it is neccesary because obviously a lot of people can not see past their 'right to party'. I have done house parties. I have gone places next to resedential neighborhoods. It is possible to have fun without being an ass.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:Y undercover? by alen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I have young kids
      Waiting for the crime means some asswipes are going to wake them up when they should sleeping
      2 year olds hate being robbed of sleep and start crying hysterically

      I'm all for cops busting concerts like this before they happen

    5. Re:Y undercover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make homemade turbines in my garage and I'm moving in next door to you.

      It's OK though, my test runs are always way shorter then the police response time. They look at the citizens like they're insane. A jet engine? Where?

    6. Re:Y undercover? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      It is much simpler to prevent a known party than to stop one when it is already in progress. What do you think would take less manpower? Contacting a planned location and telling them not to have the party and stopping the setup or showing up to a complaint and attempting to stop a party that has a couple hundred drunk punk rockers? I know which one would be definitely safer.

      By the way, noise is not the only issue with parties like this. There is vandalism, street brawls, theft, public drunkenness, etc. These are not things welcome in residential neighborhoods.

    7. Re:Y undercover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't like people want to go to a 'concert' to hear one song and get shut down by the cops. Back when I was in school people would try to have a loud party in some nice neighborhood and very few people would show up because 'it's so going to get busted I don't even want to be there.' Lo and behold, they'd get busted, a lot of kids would get arrested, etc. There's very rarely ever a teenager type party here in rich areas because the richy rich types will have phone-in-hand starting at 7PM and have the police on speed dial.

    8. Re:Y undercover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why should anyone have to accommodate your decision to radically increase your ecological foot print? Can I call the cops on you if your screaming kid doesn't shut up?

      captcha: miscarry

    9. Re:Y undercover? by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fair enough. As long as I can have the same cops troll every restaurant you frequent to prevent your two year old children from making noise that might disturb my meal. I am supposed to be eating, and I hate being robbed of a peaceful meal. And we all know, since you just specified that your two year olds are prone to crying hysterically, that there is a very real possibility there that MUST be addressed.

      Nothing is a crime until it has happened, and we are all innocent until proven guilty.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    10. Re:Y undercover? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      But why is it necessary to go undercover?

      Because they are doing this BEFORE there is any noise, before there is any crime committed.

    11. Re:Y undercover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should anyone have to accommodate your decision to radically increase your ecological foot print? Can I call the cops on you if your screaming kid doesn't shut up?

      By GP's standard, you can call the cops BEFORE his brats start to scream. We can get the booger monsters at conspiracy to make a fuss.

  3. Or Not. by jelwell · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you read the entire article, there's no proof that cops are going undercover. There's only proof that DIY show producers are paranoid. I'm more inclined to believe the latter.
    Joseph Elwell.

    1. Re:Or Not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds exactly like something an undercover cop would say

    2. Re:Or Not. by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly, you're a cop trolling here. Nobody on Slashdot reads the articles.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Or Not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're right, except for the part of the article where it says The cops told the residents of the house that they found out about the show through email, and they bragged about their phony Facebook accounts.

    4. Re:Or Not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! You call that proof? Everyone knows you can't trust the lamestream media. I'm not a cop, I swear!

    5. Re:Or Not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phony Facebook accounts? Isn't that a felony now?

  4. Boston Cops CFAA Violators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, they are going on social networks under false identities and trying to hide their real selves. Maybe Carmen Ortiz can make herself useful for a change.

  5. This can't be about noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A noisy "show" reveals itself. It doesn't make any sense to anticipate them. Upset neighbors will call *you*, then you just roll.

    They should be more concerned about the parties that aren't loud enough to attract attention; but where drugs, date rape, and other crimes could happen. If a juvenile is busted at a couple of these parties that would be a WARRANTED, as in "get a warrant" reason to monitor his account. Sheesh! Either the Boston police are really that stupid, or the journalist is. Who knows these days.

    1. Re:This can't be about noise by Githaron · · Score: 1

      I doubt cops need a warrant to friend you on Facebook and look through you profile. After all, you had to accept them as a friend. It is the equivalent of inviting a cop into your house and them noticing your pot stash on the living room table.

    2. Re:This can't be about noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're smart enough to know you're a cop as TFA says, they're smart enough not to friend you.

  6. Devil's advocate by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    I think the point is to stop the noise before it starts. Also, there's a reason why these things are kept to strict venues. You get a lot of young, dumb people in one place getting drunk/high and maybe doing dumb things. It's hard to set up checkpoints to check for drunk drivers, for example, when there's 20 little venues all playing.

    Basically people in even small groups are known to do dumb stuff that requires a bit of oversight / public safety. It's like Mosh pits. When they first started there was an etiquette and nobody got hurt. Then dumb frat boys started showing up strung out on drugs and beating the crap out of people. No more mosh pits.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Devil's advocate by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      but why should they have any say in it? and what's different between an ug concert and some guys playing cello at your daughters graduation party? legally there shouldn't be a difference at all.

      and uh.. straight x (no drugs, no nothing) guys have the most violent moshpits there are - it's the frat guys who get hurt when people forget to tell 'em that it's perfectly normal to get a fist to the face.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Devil's advocate by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the invitation to the Devil's Advocates' Grand Ball, I'll play along, too. Maybe this is also illegal drug related? Most licensed clubs will kick out drug dealers, for fear of losing their license. At an unlicensed party somewhere, anything goes. Add in some minor altercations that escalate into gang brawls (Mr. Brown, Mr. Drake?), and maybe the cops have a good reason to know where these parties are going on.

      Of course, another explanation is that the police are just emulating the methods they see used by the police on TV? On CSI, NCIS, et al the cops always solve the crimes using computers and abstruse knowledge.

      "Miss Bigtits, you said you were sleeping in a hotel in Beacon Hill the night of the murder. Well Google told me that the hotel beds there are invested with bedbugs that only feast on female breasts. So, if you would kindly remove you shirt and bra, we can clear this up quickly."

      "But thoroughly."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Devil's advocate by abirdman · · Score: 1

      This comment should be modded up. Impromptu concerts / house parties are very disruptive in residential areas, and the disruption is caused not just by the music, it's caused by the people and cars and the drugs. It's easy to forget, there are first responders sleeping, and people who have invested time and money to keep their neighborhood tidy and safe, who are very averse to getting woken up, having their lawns dug up by bad drivers, and having deal with the litter and general mayhem that accompanies any large crowd. If concerts are actually being closed down, that means the undercover work is at least partially successful, the egregious examples cited in the TFA notwithstanding. No matter how one feels about freedom and the police state, the fact is the police's job is to address this kind of disruption. This method seems low cost, and not too invasive. And much more cost effective than a massive turnout of force (in all their new TSA regalia) to shut down an event in progress.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    4. Re:Devil's advocate by abirdman · · Score: 1

      what's different between an ug concert and some guys playing cello at your daughters graduation party?

      The difference is measurable as decibels measured at some distance from the event. Most people are consistently against being woken by loud amplified music, no matter what the genre. The cellos playing at the lawn party down the street could not wake me up, unless they were amped and cranked, in which case I'd be disturbed. This kind of argument has fueled a generational divide for more than half a century, with the old people saying "turn it down," and the youngsters taking that as a sleight to their favorite band, musical genre, or lifestyle. My (now grown) children went through this, I did it when I was a younger, and my father did too. Before that, I guess there wasn't a lot of amplification, so I assume they had different issues.

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
  7. Good for them by Stargoat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm pleased that the Boston PD have a good, solid mission ahead of them. After all, you can only blow up so many Moonites before it just doesn't feel right any more.

    Buffoons.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:Good for them by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      I'm pleased that the Boston PD have a good, solid mission ahead of them. After all, you can only blow up so many Moonites before it just doesn't feel right any more.

      Buffoons.

      Well, they do have a reputation to uphold!

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  8. Re:Oh Goodie by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Both asking and answering a question in a single sentence; well done sir!

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  9. Bizarre Story by macwhizkid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, let's get this straight: there's no proof that the police are connected to this, just a half-baked assumption based on someone's analysis of a couple two-sentence emails? And the messages aren't even very funny anyway... ("LOL, he used the word concert . What a loser! Must be a cop!")

    Slashdot editors, you need to step up your game.

    1. Re:Bizarre Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot editors, you need to step up your game.

      Nope. They changed the game. Even "News For Nerds" is gone from the banner. It's about clicks, and specifically the quality of clicks is measured as quantity.

      It worked: they raised the heat slowly enough that the frog didn't jump out of the pot -- nobody created a original-concept Slashdot to replace what Slashdot has become. They didn't have a readership crash in this ugly transition from nerd newstation to dweeb forum. And posts bitching about it are just as much a paycheque resource as anything informative to the subject.

    2. Re:Bizarre Story by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I agree that the electronic "proof" is pretty weak.

      The police showing up numerous times just ahead of the event and giving warnings is fairly suspicious though.

      Regardless I don't know that I care. I mean, I'd like the cops to be out doing something more productive than trying to ferret out noise disturbances before they happen. But what exactly would that more productive activity be, maybe handing out more revenue tickets or eating more donuts?

      If you are deliberately planning to cause enough of a racket that your neighbors will call to complain you're an asshole straight up and the cops shutting you down and harassing you ahead of time is hardly worth the tears of anyone.

    3. Re:Bizarre Story by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      RTFA?

      "According to one local musician who asked not to be named, the day before a show this past weekend, police showed up at a house in the Allston neighborhood, home of many of these house shows, claiming that they already knew the bands scheduled to play. The cops told the residents of the house that they found out about the show through email, and they bragged about their phony Facebook accounts. "

    4. Re:Bizarre Story by Mathness · · Score: 1

      Slashdot have editors!? I though it was a game where you tried to get some named bots to accept submissions based upon specific keywords. :p

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
  10. Time to say some money by sackofdonuts · · Score: 1

    Seems the cops in Boston have a lot of free time these days. Time to save the city some money and reduce the police workforce a bit.

  11. A few prowl cars... by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    is all they need for most of these cars running around with the stereo playing so loud the trunk appears to be passing wind.

    I'm now wondering what sort of live music scene there is in Boston. Sounds healthy if there's a lot of bands setting up on street corners or in parks.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:A few prowl cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they need for most of these cars running around with the stereo playing so loud the trunk appears to be passing wind.

      Reminds me of Corner Gas,

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=mBUNXDGp7Qo#t=420s

      FYI, in the episode, Sergeant Davis (in the car), is kind of sensitive about getting old. And there is the result.

  12. Re:Concerts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boston's not a country. Did you go to Public School?

  13. If you think it's so trivial by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 0

    How about you let me keep you from getting any sleep for just 10 days.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:If you think it's so trivial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Headphones dude, headphones. You can't control the world, but you can control your reactions to it. File police reports if you wish (and you went over and asked them nicely to turn down the music first right?), but you'll still need some type of ear cover to sleep even if the police decide to step in.

    2. Re:If you think it's so trivial by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      This. I don't think the story is accurate but sleep deprivation is used as a literal form of torture for good reason, and can have enormous effects on your health, memory, in a wide variety of areas. It's no laughing matter, no matter how much fun the cool kids are having. Wikipedia says:

      Generally, sleep deprivation may result in:[5][6]

              aching muscles[7]
              confusion, memory lapses or loss[6][8]
              depression[8]
              hallucinations[8]
              hand tremors[9]
              headaches
              malaise
              sensitivity to cold
              periorbital puffiness, commonly known as "bags under eyes" or eye bags
              increased blood pressure[10][11]
              increased stress hormone levels[11]
              increased risk of diabetes[11]
              increased risk of fibromyalgia[12]
              irritability[5]
              nystagmus (rapid involuntary rhythmic eye movement)[13]
              obesity[11]
              temper tantrums in children[5]
              yawning[5]
              symptoms similar to:
                      Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)[5]
                      Psychosis[14]

    3. Re:If you think it's so trivial by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Dude, headphones are insufficient (so you don't really go to sleep until you collapse) and they wake you up from the pain after a few hours.

      You can't control your reactions to deep bass. It manipulates your body directly. That's why people use it in concerts. It also passes easily through fairly thick walls.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:If you think it's so trivial by lxs · · Score: 1

      They left out:

      Yelling at kids to get off your lawn

    5. Re:If you think it's so trivial by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Kids need sleep as much as anyone, they just usually aren't doing anything important enough with their lives yet to miss it. Zing!

    6. Re:If you think it's so trivial by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Asking a 'victim' likely won't get you the most impartial answer, but then again, what is and is not trivial is a subjective matter to begin with. I do consider it trivial enough as to find it ridiculous that they might be using undercover cops to stop things such as this.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    7. Re:If you think it's so trivial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hadn't thought of that. Thanks.

  14. useless lazy donut-humping cops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lazy assed cops, thinking shutting down house shows is somehow more important than chasing after murderers, robbers, rapists, etc... and they wonder why civilians fucking hate them. Waste of tax money, for sure.

  15. Re:Concerts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhh, what's the joke I'm supposed to care about, man? Like, you said I'm supposed to seriously fuck someone in my country?

  16. the right of the people peaceably to assemble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

          --The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America

    I would say these people are rather peacably assembling, certainly more so then in say Terminiello v. Chicago or worse R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul

    1. Re:the right of the people peaceably to assemble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "peaceable" if it infringes upon the right of another to the "peaceable enjoyment of his own property."

      There is substantial case law that says the government is well within its rights to regulate assembly.

    2. Re:the right of the people peaceably to assemble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before the event occurs, you cannot know that there will be unreasonable noise pollution. While the measure may be being ARGUED about noise, it's not about noise. If it where really about noise, they would wait for the noise complaint, then check of the noise levels where in compliance with noise ordinances, and handle the situation at that point.

      This is about preventing me from having an assembly on my private property. Considering the disturbance has not occurred at the time of the police action, this is also a violation of the 4th amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"

      In addition, I think R.A.V. HEAVILY "infringed upon the right of another to the "peaceable enjoyment of his own property.""

    3. Re:the right of the people peaceably to assemble by lgw · · Score: 1

      The police aren't going to show up and arrest you before you have your party - they're going to show up and tell you that if you have an illegal party, they're going to arrest you before if gets started. What counts as an "illegal" party will vary.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:the right of the people peaceably to assemble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A warrant is not required if a law enforcement officer witnesses a crime, and "witnessing" a crime means only that he can hear it in this case.

      The police are well within their rights to bust up illegal assemblies if those assemblies are breaking the law and the evidence is in plain sound.

      This is settled. There is no arguing it.

    5. Re:the right of the people peaceably to assemble by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Right, arrest you before you can make noise and disturb the peace... before any crime (er, infraction, more likely) is committed. So what someone needs to do is have all the setup for the "illegal party" -- except don't party. Just rig all the props. Then let's see what the cops have to say, not to mention the courts.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:the right of the people peaceably to assemble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case it's a pretty easy to see why they crack down so hard on venues that sell alcohol without a license.

    7. Re:the right of the people peaceably to assemble by Holi · · Score: 1

      Well since you have planned and invited many to your event, you have already conspired to commit a crime (which is a crime in itself) they could take you into custody right then. But they don't they let you know that if you do attempt to go forward with this event it will be shut down before it has a chance to happen and you will be arrested. We are not talking about your little party with your friends, we are talking about a full promoted event that serves alcohol without a license and has no age restrictions.

      So if you go and announce to a bunch of people that you a putting on a big show just to trap the cops I really doubt your going to get a court to agree that they had no right to investigate and stop you.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    8. Re:the right of the people peaceably to assemble by psiclops · · Score: 1

      Well since you have planned and invited many to your event, you have already conspired to commit a crime

      inviting people to my house is a crime now?

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
  17. Erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They only think he's a cop because he said "show" instead of "concert." So yeah that's dumb but--wait, you're telling me he called it by both names? Wait--he called it a show FIRST? As if they weren't going off of nothing. (not to mention that the article refers to it as both a concert and a show.)

    Whoever wrote this article is a fucking moron, as is whoever posted it here and wrote the ridiculous summary. This is worse than like CNN bullshit.

  18. Boston PD by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

    Boston PD, continually proving how batshit wacko a police department can be. They've caused a terrorist scare over a bunch of light-bright advertising signs, blown up their own "Department of Transportations" traffic monitors & have a well documented history of arresting/attacking people who legally videotape them.

    1. Re:Boston PD by j-turkey · · Score: 1

      But there were batteries and electrical tape. Anything with batteries and duct tape must be a terrorist plot...especially when Mooninites are involved.

      --

      -Turkey

    2. Re:Boston PD by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

      The most humorous (or most dangerous depending how you look at it) aspect of that fiasco is that a majority of the signs had been up for several weeks. Not only did the Boston PD vastly overreact upon noticing them, but they failed to notice devices that they are quoted as saying shared "some characteristics with improvised explosive devices" for weeks that were purposely placed in high visibility areas.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Boston_Bomb_Scare

  19. I don't understand this by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    There's no reason to go undercover or assign police to track social networking. There's already an early warning system for nuisance loud music -- it's called neighbors. If you get a call that someone is playing obnoxiously loud, that's the only clue you need.

    It's not raucous if nobody is disturbed. If someone is disturbed, they'll say. What undercover work is necessary here?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:I don't understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These aren't house parties... they are unlicensed ticketed concerts in the student ghetto.

    2. Re:I don't understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about to prevent the crime from happening, that way no one gets arrested and the neighbors are not disturbed. Seems to work out better for all parties involved.

    3. Re:I don't understand this by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      The thing is, it (disturbing the peace) is not a crime until it happens.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  20. Pigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time well spent !

  21. I see a Supreme Court trip by russotto · · Score: 1

    ...not for the cops engaging in pre-crime enforcement, but First Amendment violations related to the ordinance they passed. It's not a noise ordinance as others have been trying to make out, it's a fine for any gathering "which consitutes a violation of law OR [emphasis mine] creates a substantial disturbance of the quiet enjoyment of private or public property in a neighborhood. Behavior constituting a public nuisance includes but is not limited to excessive noise, obstruction of public ways by crowds or vehicles, illegal parking, the service of alcohol to underage persons, fights, and disturbances of the peace."

    (note that "quiet enjoyment" is a term of art which doesn't refer specifically to noise)

    It's overbroad, it's vague and it implicates the 1st amendment.

    1. Re:I see a Supreme Court trip by Holi · · Score: 1

      First on their first visit there is no fine, there is no arrest, they calmly tell you that they know about the event and if you go forward with it, it will be shut down and you may be arrested. You have already committed the crime by promoting an illegal event. Remember these are not parties they are promoted shows that are in the business to make money, they serve booze, and in general act like a club but with out all that pesky licensing. I think you would get laughed out of the state SC if you tried to bring a 1st amendment defense.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:I see a Supreme Court trip by russotto · · Score: 1

      First on their first visit there is no fine, there is no arrest, they calmly tell you that they know about the event and if you go forward with it, it will be shut down and you may be arrested. You have already committed the crime by promoting an illegal event.

      The ordinance does not limit itself to "illegal events", whatever they may be.

  22. Might be illegal for a reason. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There might be a surge of house concerts, causing mass disturbances, and now the police are actually trying to do something about it BEFORE it happens.
    OMG, somebody make it stop.

    Police taking a few minutes out of their day to try and curb this in the butt.

  23. Article about the "scene" in Baltimore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://bmoremedia.com/features/houseconcerts031213.aspx

    I don't know if this is the type of concert that Boston PD is targeting, but if it is it seems like people getting together for a party that has musicians playing. The pictures don't suggest a bunch of drunk kids partying it up and doing drugs. The one mentioned in the article doesn't seem to be violating any laws. Charging money to get in probably would, but they're simply asking for donations and selling CDs.

    Years before "social media" in another town I remember going to a couple of things very similar. They were not big and were held in upscale houses that rotated around - not to avoid hassles from police, but because people were sharing the responsibility of playing host. Boston probably has a higher population density and so the chance to bother neighbors and generate noise complaints is probably higher.

  24. Because Black & Mexican gangs are dangerous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's much safer to use the spies and SWAT team on suburban white kids playing music!

    That way you can pretend to be tough without actually being in danger!

    Next up on Cops - shooting grandma's dog and throwing her to the floor looking for illegal Canadian pain killers!

  25. Re:Concerts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is Boston again? Is that in North Korea?

  26. blah blah misdirected rant blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to get a home in a decent neighborhood that should be relatively free of pointless noise

    then they probably aren't living in allston.

  27. Nothing new here in Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nothing new here, I went to college in Boston in the late 80s and both the music scene and the cops were doing the same thing, sans Facebook. The Ska scene was waning but bands like the Bosstones and Bim Skala Bim and Post-punk college bands like Scruffy the Cat and were playing house parties in Allston, Brighton, and Jamaica Plains and warehouse clubs like Paradise and The Rat. Cops were undercover trying to find and bust them for "noise violations" and underage drinking.

    Same old same old in a college town... only reason this is news is that the cops are now flailing on Facebook to boot?

    1. Re:Nothing new here in Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bim Skala Bim remains one of my favorite bands of all time!

  28. Call the waaaambulance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you are saying police can't investigate *any* misdemeanor while a serious crime is on the books? Bullshit. More like you're a waah waah i wanna turn up my stereo baaaaw crybaby who doesn't understand the reason the cops are knocking on your door is your neighbors want you to STFU. Grow up and get over it.

  29. Boston: The City of Hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you don't live in Boston then you wouldn't understand why we do the things we do. Have you ever gone driving on the Jamaicaway, walk around Berkley around 3:30pm on a Friday, tried talking to people on the street, parked at an inner city gas station that doesn't even have gas, getting a combo meal at Dunkin Donuts, used the Green Line, get a parking ticket in Beacon Hill for sitting in your car for 3 minutes, or done any of these delightful things in Boston? If you have then you know exactly what I'm talking about. Boston is the city of hate. Everyone from good old Tom Menino down to the foul-mouthed Red Sox fan knows that the primary objective is to maximize annoyance and dysfunction. The police wasting our time and money on this garbage so fits the profile of our fair city that nothing surprises me. If you disagree, then you've never been to the court house in Roxbury or the police station in Jamaica Plain. I can't see how any institutions could be managed worse. Remember the JP clerk that tampered with the evidence of thousands of drug cases? Eh, we'll forget about that. Instead let's try to chum up to some lousy Harvard/young person ideal by using Facebook to do everything. Remember, the crippling failures who are administering essential services in our city are utterly hopeless and need something to distract themselves with, otherwise they'd try to do their job and end up doing more damage. If you've never had a taste of this while living in Boston then clearly you're living under a rock or working for some very insular ultra-elitist academic cell. Say, dood, mind if I come ova to your office and tak about the Patriots? See what I mean?

  30. Hilarious would be... by Nexion · · Score: 1

    Hilarious would be if the officers could somehow apply for the permit for the organizers upon hearing of the event, have a judge sign off on it and show up to the event to scold organizers on not getting the permit, charge the process fees for the permit they processed for them before wishing everyone present a safe and fun night as they leave.

    It would take being that renegade non-conformist type up a notch

  31. Crack down their sport professional teams too. by antdude · · Score: 1

    Celtics and Red Sox. I hate them. :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  32. The actual story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's not being said here is that Clearchannel (who owns basically all of Boston's "legitimate" music venues) puts pressure on the city to crack down on DIY music venues simply because they don't like competition. There are no actual noise complaints involved, here, they're just using a noise ordinance to crack down on independent artists. On your tax dollar, of course.

  33. Substances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    House shows operate without and alcohol or drug regulations, as you would find in a legitimate venue. Underage drinking has always been as issue at house shows, but now I see kids doing a lot more molly and stupid shit at shows, and the cops are all over it in my area.