Based on the definition of art; the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power; I would say that any game is art if the game-play, story, or even background is appreciated for emotional power.
As you pointed out, Ebert applies his own, narrower definition. Since he is not engaged by the power of games (until he actually, you know, plays them) he does not consider them art. I do. From my view, Ebert made far more pretentious statements than deep nuggets of wisdom. I, however, am not inclined to perform a count.
Why did the chicken cross the road? Which came first, the chicken or the egg? If I tell you I am lying to you, can that be the truth? If you went back and time and became your own grandfather, who came first, you or your mother? Can your name spell you?
Oh, no. I just store a one way hash for each letter. Then I can verify any combination in any order. And I store a hash for the common permutations the system uses, for even better performance. In fact, I have a complete rainbow table for your password. For it to work, of course I use the same salt for all of it. And for speed, I store the salt in the same data store as the hashes....
And I am sure there is someone out there with a worse scheme than this to meet the bank regulations.
* I do not represent any bank or business, and these comments are entirely my own sarcasm.
I read through this whole thread and there is a common theme: desktop and mobile. I think the concept of all platforms includes washing machines, toasters, Pi, Arduino, door locks, security panels, smoke detectors, etc. When I look at it that way, I see more than the monitor/keyboard/mouse/monitor(s) setup of a desktop, or the touch/screed/sensors interface of a smartphone.
How would a shopping program work? Could it run in my pantry, refrigerator, washing machine, garage, or anywhere I use consumables? Would each of these be able to communicate so that I can view my shopping list at any time? Would they work with my printer? What about my note-taking program?
Even more, could they send that list to my favorite stores so all I have to do when I arrive is choose perishables like meat and vegetables? Is the store running a scaled up version of the same software? Or maybe running an instance of the software for each customer in a VM?
I imagine a world trending toward Futurama, where everything is a robot of some type, albeit not AI. They can all communicate and take care of my needs mostly without my input. My vacuum knows when to go to work, the floor tells it about the traffic. Other sensors in the floor let the wet cleaner know to clean up a spill. The refrigerator makes sure to stock itself with my favorite drinks, so that they are cold and ready whenever I want one. And since they can all run the same software, I can play Upset Ornithoids on all of them without losing my high score, or take a note and know it will be wherever I am.
It's not about how we can program any one class of device, it's about how we can program all devices at once.
There really are only three types of conversation I can have with you: I can offer to exchange or exchange something of value with you (e.g. cash for goods), I can ask something of value from you (e.g. time, donations), or we can exchange meaningless platitudes. I know that is a very basic way to look at it, but the exchange is the whole point of having a conversation, even if the exchange is of knowledge.
As a married introvert who plays D&D regularly and hangs out with friends regularly, I can provide anecdotal evidence to support this thesis. While I do enjoy my social time, I end up exhausted afterwards. I keep my circle to people I trust.
I have a Chevrolet Volt, and it can e-mail or text me when charging is complete. It also provides an estimated charge time which is pretty accurate. While it doesn't Supercharge, I suspect that notification is a pretty common feature for EVs.
Regulate all you want. Malware authors won't care; they are already breaking the law. International corporations won't care, they just won't sell to the US. Users won't care, their thing works. So who are the targets of the regulation?
You may not borrow my circular saw, ever. The problem with that assumption is that all of the reasons for using the right tools (axe, chainsaw) are gone; no sap, the tree is all dry wood, there are no fibrous sections in the bark, etc. That is the same problem I see all the time with evangelists for any tool. In order to make a rational, evaluated decision, all facts must be looked at as objectively as possible. Or to use an old quote "the right tool for the right job".
I am a teacher. My pay - and my very having a job - is measured on how many of the students I teach get an "A" according to the metrics used by the administration. By having the smart kids carry the slower kids, I can guarantee the maximum number of students receiving that "A"; even though the standardized testing used to measure their performance is individualized, the smart kids can impart enough temporary knowledge on the slower ones to make the grade. What should I do?
You posit a geometric series an you expect it to not trend to infinity? Let's expand the series to 5 years, and we will use the constant of 3:2 that you provided as the index. Based on your series, the increase annually is x2, so we have:
In five years a $3 candy bar will cost $48. While the purchasing power would theoretically remain the same, the government has no way to ensure that ratio remains constant. The result is that the denominator (cost) rises faster than the numerator (income) and the ratio becomes significantly skewed. This is the formula that required trillion dollar notes in one country.
It certainly seemed that they were using it to mean exactly the products provided by IMAX - the quite unaffordable for home theater large screen format movie theaters.
I don't think any amount of "drilling it into" everyone's heads will help. The underlying issue appears to be that the security folks take everything security related personally (like a crusade), the IT folks take it as something they have to do to keep their jobs, and the non-technical folks take it as just another random policy from the higher ups.
In order for security to mean anything, it needs to be personal. Everyone needs to understand not only how to protect themselves, but why they want to. This approach is why self defense classes across the US (and possibly in other countries) are filled with people wanting to learn - these people have a real, personal fear that they will end up being the victim if they don't and the consequences of being a victim are close and personal.
Security professional and IT professionals, unfortunately, avoid marketing and avoid employing marketing people to deliver this message in a way that will have impact to the non-technical world. And in doing so, we end up coming across as end-of-the-world doomsayers - until it is too late and the doom has come.
And what about those of us who actually are removing a car from the road? Since I can chauffeur her around my wife does not need a license or car, so she has neither. This removes a car from the road and I carry an unlicensed driver frequently.
It is erroneous to assume that the lack of a license is indicative of a lack of need for a car; it only indicates that a person has chosen an alternate to driving their own car for some reason.
And we don't want to forget the other benefits a well trained service dog provides:
They don't require wifi, internet, or electricity. By law (in the US) it can go anywhere she can go, and can do so on its own. They are self recharging - they typically sleep on their handler's schedule. They will still wake up if something happens when they are asleep, and can still respond. It can be trained to alert medical responders, guard her from others if she collapses in public, and protect the public from accidental injury. Seizure dogs can often detect a seizure well before the person goes into a full grand mal state, and move the person against a wall so that they do not fall and hurt themselves. They can also help the person remain calm (by being dogs) which may help reduce the chances of an episode.
And when they are at home, they are still dogs, so can play, cuddle, and love your family like any dog.
Slashdot Mirror
"I know AI when I see it." often followed by "That is not AI"
Wall-E managed to do it. Most folks can tell exactly what Wall-E or EVE is thinking just from their case and LCD language.
Based on the definition of art; the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power; I would say that any game is art if the game-play, story, or even background is appreciated for emotional power. As you pointed out, Ebert applies his own, narrower definition. Since he is not engaged by the power of games (until he actually, you know, plays them) he does not consider them art. I do. From my view, Ebert made far more pretentious statements than deep nuggets of wisdom. I, however, am not inclined to perform a count.
F!ck7hat
Why did the chicken cross the road?
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
If I tell you I am lying to you, can that be the truth?
If you went back and time and became your own grandfather, who came first, you or your mother?
Can your name spell you?
Oh, no. I just store a one way hash for each letter. Then I can verify any combination in any order. And I store a hash for the common permutations the system uses, for even better performance. In fact, I have a complete rainbow table for your password. For it to work, of course I use the same salt for all of it. And for speed, I store the salt in the same data store as the hashes....
And I am sure there is someone out there with a worse scheme than this to meet the bank regulations.
* I do not represent any bank or business, and these comments are entirely my own sarcasm.
YOU are only allowed to ship small batteries. A billionaire who can buy the cargo planes can find a way to ship almost anything by air.
I read through this whole thread and there is a common theme: desktop and mobile. I think the concept of all platforms includes washing machines, toasters, Pi, Arduino, door locks, security panels, smoke detectors, etc. When I look at it that way, I see more than the monitor/keyboard/mouse/monitor(s) setup of a desktop, or the touch/screed/sensors interface of a smartphone.
How would a shopping program work? Could it run in my pantry, refrigerator, washing machine, garage, or anywhere I use consumables? Would each of these be able to communicate so that I can view my shopping list at any time? Would they work with my printer? What about my note-taking program?
Even more, could they send that list to my favorite stores so all I have to do when I arrive is choose perishables like meat and vegetables? Is the store running a scaled up version of the same software? Or maybe running an instance of the software for each customer in a VM?
I imagine a world trending toward Futurama, where everything is a robot of some type, albeit not AI. They can all communicate and take care of my needs mostly without my input. My vacuum knows when to go to work, the floor tells it about the traffic. Other sensors in the floor let the wet cleaner know to clean up a spill. The refrigerator makes sure to stock itself with my favorite drinks, so that they are cold and ready whenever I want one. And since they can all run the same software, I can play Upset Ornithoids on all of them without losing my high score, or take a note and know it will be wherever I am.
It's not about how we can program any one class of device, it's about how we can program all devices at once.
Isn't that what most conversations already are?
There really are only three types of conversation I can have with you: I can offer to exchange or exchange something of value with you (e.g. cash for goods), I can ask something of value from you (e.g. time, donations), or we can exchange meaningless platitudes. I know that is a very basic way to look at it, but the exchange is the whole point of having a conversation, even if the exchange is of knowledge.
Where one falls, two shall rise in its place.
As a married introvert who plays D&D regularly and hangs out with friends regularly, I can provide anecdotal evidence to support this thesis. While I do enjoy my social time, I end up exhausted afterwards. I keep my circle to people I trust.
I have a Chevrolet Volt, and it can e-mail or text me when charging is complete. It also provides an estimated charge time which is pretty accurate. While it doesn't Supercharge, I suspect that notification is a pretty common feature for EVs.
Regulate all you want. Malware authors won't care; they are already breaking the law. International corporations won't care, they just won't sell to the US. Users won't care, their thing works. So who are the targets of the regulation?
You may not borrow my circular saw, ever. The problem with that assumption is that all of the reasons for using the right tools (axe, chainsaw) are gone; no sap, the tree is all dry wood, there are no fibrous sections in the bark, etc. That is the same problem I see all the time with evangelists for any tool. In order to make a rational, evaluated decision, all facts must be looked at as objectively as possible. Or to use an old quote "the right tool for the right job".
A more accurate version of thermonuclear would be thermonuclear triggered. The military just likes to shorten things.
CD 10
Hypothetical scenario:
I am a teacher. My pay - and my very having a job - is measured on how many of the students I teach get an "A" according to the metrics used by the administration. By having the smart kids carry the slower kids, I can guarantee the maximum number of students receiving that "A"; even though the standardized testing used to measure their performance is individualized, the smart kids can impart enough temporary knowledge on the slower ones to make the grade. What should I do?
You posit a geometric series an you expect it to not trend to infinity? Let's expand the series to 5 years, and we will use the constant of 3:2 that you provided as the index. Based on your series, the increase annually is x2, so we have:
3:2, 6:4, 12:8, 24:16, 48:32
in dollars:
$3, $6, $12, $24, $48
In five years a $3 candy bar will cost $48. While the purchasing power would theoretically remain the same, the government has no way to ensure that ratio remains constant. The result is that the denominator (cost) rises faster than the numerator (income) and the ratio becomes significantly skewed. This is the formula that required trillion dollar notes in one country.
It certainly seemed that they were using it to mean exactly the products provided by IMAX - the quite unaffordable for home theater large screen format movie theaters.
I don't think any amount of "drilling it into" everyone's heads will help. The underlying issue appears to be that the security folks take everything security related personally (like a crusade), the IT folks take it as something they have to do to keep their jobs, and the non-technical folks take it as just another random policy from the higher ups.
In order for security to mean anything, it needs to be personal. Everyone needs to understand not only how to protect themselves, but why they want to. This approach is why self defense classes across the US (and possibly in other countries) are filled with people wanting to learn - these people have a real, personal fear that they will end up being the victim if they don't and the consequences of being a victim are close and personal.
Security professional and IT professionals, unfortunately, avoid marketing and avoid employing marketing people to deliver this message in a way that will have impact to the non-technical world. And in doing so, we end up coming across as end-of-the-world doomsayers - until it is too late and the doom has come.
Since the prime directive applies - by definition - to pre-warp civilizations it would indeed apply to us.
I'll resist this with every decagram of my being.
I won't give 2 centimeters on this issue.
They came at us with a shit ton of rockets and mortars!
They came at us with a metric shit ton of rockets and mortars!
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
An decagram of prevention is worth a kilogram of cure.
FTFY
And what about those of us who actually are removing a car from the road? Since I can chauffeur her around my wife does not need a license or car, so she has neither. This removes a car from the road and I carry an unlicensed driver frequently.
It is erroneous to assume that the lack of a license is indicative of a lack of need for a car; it only indicates that a person has chosen an alternate to driving their own car for some reason.
And we don't want to forget the other benefits a well trained service dog provides:
They don't require wifi, internet, or electricity. By law (in the US) it can go anywhere she can go, and can do so on its own.
They are self recharging - they typically sleep on their handler's schedule. They will still wake up if something happens when they are asleep, and can still respond.
It can be trained to alert medical responders, guard her from others if she collapses in public, and protect the public from accidental injury.
Seizure dogs can often detect a seizure well before the person goes into a full grand mal state, and move the person against a wall so that they do not fall and hurt themselves.
They can also help the person remain calm (by being dogs) which may help reduce the chances of an episode.
And when they are at home, they are still dogs, so can play, cuddle, and love your family like any dog.
Inc? Include i? Increase i? Incest i?