Slashdot Mirror
NASA Trailer To Be Shown Before Star Trek: Into Darkness
Tired of seeing ads for cars and soda before the films you watch at the theater? Well, a successful crowdfunding campaign at Indiegogo will see a trimmed down version of NASA's 'We Are Explorers' video aired before showings of the upcoming Star Trek: Into Darkness in theaters all over the country. "Most people recognize space as a key expression of our character. They know our space programs as a globally recognized brand of ingenuity. The recently landed Mars Curiosity Rover was the latest reminder that space systems are the crown jewels of our scientific and technical prowess. Less known is the indispensable value space systems bring to our everyday lives. Space provides irreplaceable capabilities for defense, public health, finance, medicine, energy, agriculture, transportation, development and countless other fields. Investments in space programs are precisely about improving and protecting life on Earth. ... By funding this campaign, we can remind students and the general public that our nation's space agency is working hard on the next era of exploration." The campaign's funding goal was reached in just six days — their stretch goal will increase the number of theaters for the clip from 59 screens to 750. The movie comes out on May 17th.
Wider exposure to science cannot be a bad thing.
Keep on knockin'
https://robbiecrash.me
It's not like you have to convince the average Star Trek fan that NASA should get some sensible funding.
But given the quality of the more recent Star Trek movies, this might just be the best thing they'll see that evening.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
The fundamental principle of Capitalism [...]
Because we know how well it works with humans in command, right[U+2e2e]
`echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
bzzt wrong...nasa can't spend money on a commercial - this was funded by donations
Yes yes, damn the government. Too bad your far flung accusations have no basis in this case, as it's a crowdfunded campaign. But don't let facts get in the way of your derp. Wear it proudly.
1. It isn't your capital, it's the taxes that an elected legislature empowered by the Constitution collects.
2. Don't wreck a perfectly good economic system with Libertarian nonsense.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
The entire thing basically looks like the intro of Star Trek: Enterprise. Minus the singing.
Also, practically minus the "future". All that trailer does is show things NASA "used to do".
Making the ST: E intro far more inspirational.
On the other hand, "We are explorers" is not really the motto that syncs with Jar Jar's Trek - which is about lens flares, explosions, running, shooting and apparently tits in space.
Not that there's anything wrong with tits in space, it's just that when talking about "exploration of celestial spheres" our goal should be set a little farther than a pair of double Ds.
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
TFA cites younger people as being the target audience. As a young person who also happens to know quite a few other young people this seems strange. In general, young people tend to understand the importance of NASA and space programs in general - we all know all know the associated trivia such as where ballpoint pens and Teflon came from. We all know the importance of science - we are all (unless you are in the Bible Belt of the USA) taught it in school and we are all aware of what science can do for us.
It seems to me that the people who actually need to be targeted are the middle aged and older people who are in control of the votes and money needed to revitalise the space programs. Luckily, there is some penetration of Star Trek into these age groups.
Yeah, 'cause capitalists never screw up.
Or screw us.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
That's exactly how I felt about it: It was a modestly interesting SF movie, but it wasn't Star Trek.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
.. I wish there was a "This video was funded by public donations" under the NASA ad at the end. I can see a lot of people in the theatre being needlessly jaded by the idea that their tax dollars were spent advertising a government agency, when that isn't the case here.
Problem is War is more profitable and more desirable to human kind. We prefer to kill each other in the name of god, peace, and love.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
What excites me more than shuttle missions are satellites and probes NASA has been sending out all these years.
MRO and to a lesser extent MSL are worth 20 round trip human mars missions as far as I'm concerned. New telescopes like JWST are likely to be as priceless as HST and WMAP have proven to be.
It is simply cheaper and more productive to push technology without having to worry about earthly things like human safety.
My only problem with the video other than being slightly cheezy is the video is all rockets and no science.
What's the point of showing a NASA promotional video before a Star Trek movie? Everyone who watches that movie is already a fan of space exploration. The video should be shown in front of something completely different, like The Great Gatsby.
I would have sponsored the funding campaign on Indiegogo if that had been their goal. Instead, it's just preaching to the choir. What a waste.
And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
Yea, it was a lot better than the old one.
The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
Speaking as a non-American, NASA is one of the few things I find myself admiring about the USA, and certainly one of the most worthy.
Your government clearly underestimates the high esteem in which NASA is held around the world, otherwise it would fund the bejesus out of it.
Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
That is the nature of any inter-generational story. Some fanboy will always whine that the newest incarnation is not a true Scotsman.
It doesn't matter if it's Dickens or Batman.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
In my opinion it could have been far more convincing. It is not just an "optional" desire to explore the reason we should fund NASA. It is the moral and logical imperative in order to survive as species. For the survival of intelligent species on earth. Larry Niven's line comes to mind: The dinosaurs are extinct because they did not have a space program. We need more telescopes around the earth and Venus to look for incoming small and large objects that can hit earth. And then we need to devise ways to intercept and avoid them. This argument does not make space exploration an optional luxury, but a critical necessity.