Slashdot Mirror


WikiLeaks Party Launching This Week

PuZZleDucK writes "The ABC (audio) and the Canberra Times (text) are reporting on Greg Barns and Julian Assange teaming up to form the WikiLeaks Party. From the article: 'Mr Barns said on Monday he had agreed to be the WikiLeaks Party campaign director following conversations with Mr Assange, who has announced he will run for a Senate seat in Victoria in the September 14 federal election. "The party will offer a refreshing change from the Australian government culture of secrecy, whether Labor or Liberal," he said.'"

10 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Good luck with that by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

    April 2nd here. The people launching it think it is serious even if other people think it's a joke.
    Even if Julian is lying through his teeth and guilty as hell of everything he's been accused of in Sweden he is too honest for Australian politics.

  2. Re:Good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    As an Australian I can assure you that this isn't a joke. The party was announced more than a year ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks_Political_Party

  3. He has a chance by Captain+Sensible · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He has a chance, if opinion polls are to be believed, and thanks to the voting system used.

    Australian Senators are elected for a term of 6 years, with a half senate election every three years. There are 6 senators for each state. The voting is by a proportional representation variant of the single transferable vote system (called the ‘preferential system’ in Australia).

    Minority parties need to get at least 7% of the ‘first preference’ vote and be able to agree to an ‘exchange of preferences’* with other minority parties to have a chance at a seat in the Senate.

    Although Assange is domiciled overseas and under threat of arrest, he is still able to run for the Senate. Under section 20 of the constitution, a senator may be dismissed if he is unable to attend for 2 consecutive months and has not been granted leave of absence by the president of the senate. However, under section 15, his place must be filled by another member of his party, conventionally, one who was listed on the ballot paper but who was unelected. Under section 44(ii), he would also lose his seat if sentenced to 12 months or more imprisonment, but only if this was done by an Australian court. In this case again his place would be filled under section 15.

    This new party would be best advised to stand a full senate team for each state and look to exchange preferences with other minor parties. The difficulty here is that the Wiki Party voters would probably also be Greens voters and the Greens might be hostile to an exchange.

    *A complex series of deals to exchange votes on the ballot paper, but done openly and advertised in campaign literature.

    1. Re:He has a chance by BBCWatcher · · Score: 2

      Not a problem. Assange would have several Commonwealth-only commercial airline routes from England to Australia. It's also possible to fly him privately from England to Australian territory nonstop, probably using a Gulfstream G650 and probably from Manston which offers a long runway. For example, Manston to the Cocos Islands would be 6,176 nautical miles (Great Circle distance) which is the sort of range a Gulfstream can manage quite safely. There are three other Commonwealth countries under that particular flight route, and Christmas Island might be a suitable alternate.

  4. Re:Should be a wikileaks funeral by simplexion · · Score: 3, Informative

    They have published lots of things recently, namely the Global Intelligence Files. http://wikileaks.org/the-gifiles.html

  5. Re:declare that I am not a member of another party by g-lock82 · · Score: 2

    Is standard. Party membership numbers are used to determine things like funding allocations, and if you let people enrol multiple times for multiple parties the system becomes easy to game (like football grand final tickets).

  6. Re:Good luck with that by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Right now he could rape kids and still be more honest and trustworthy than most politicians

    It would be a refreshing change to be able to vote for something but a corporate ho. I mean, if you have to vote for a criminal anyway, why not one with a crime that doesn't affect the country directly?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. WikiLeaks Party with Julian Assange by Kiwikwi · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one who (upon reading the title) was getting stoked for a party in the Ecuadorian embassy? Bring your own booze, and party all night with Julian and ambassador Ana Mora! (Just be wary of drowsing off.)

  8. Re:Rot13 by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

    You mean from advertisers who target geeks who find rot13 obvious and get that it was Apr1?

    I'm betting they just solidified their demographics a bit.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  9. Why not join with PPAU? by diorcc · · Score: 2

    In terms of principles and values Wikileaks has a lot in common with the Pirate Party and the Australian chapter ( http://pirateparty.org.au/ ). I see no reason in making yet another party. Unless they just want to capitalize on name recognition. I guess that's probably the sole reason - ro re-invent that wheel (pirate wheel: http://falkvinge.net/pirate-wheel/ ).