Slashdot Mirror


Intraterrestrials: Mars Life May Hide Deep Below

astroengine writes "Almost every month we see news dispatches from the Mars where the nuclear-powered rover Curiosity finds water-bearing minerals in rocks and other circumstantial clues that the Red Planet could have once supported life. But in terms of finding direct evidence of past or present Martians, the rover barely scratches the surface, says geochemist Jan Amend of the University of Southern California. Using Earth life as an example, some species of microbes live miles below the surface, without sunlight or oxygen, metabolizing chemicals that are the result of radioactive decay. Most intriguing of all is the microbe Desulforudis Audaxviator that dwells nearly two miles down, a life form that would feel right at home inside Mars' crust. 'This organism has had to figure out everything on its own,' says Amend, 'it splits water into hydrogen and oxygen for metabolism.' Amend hopes to drop probes deep underground in some of the world's most inhospitable locations over the next few years, creating a possible analog for future Mars subsurface studies."

15 of 79 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Jesus Christ by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Informative

    what are you blathering about, the wars of choice waste so much money the space budget (and all other science combined) is of no consequence

    we do have the cash to do science, and we'd have a lot more not spending hundreds of billions every decade to slaughter innocents

  2. "intraterrestrial" by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do not think that word means what you think it means.

    1. Re:"intraterrestrial" by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      But intramarstrial is too hard to say.

    2. Re:"intraterrestrial" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Intramarsial" has an unpleasant tendency of making people think of antisocial kangaroos.

  3. Re:Jesus Christ by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

    You want to find aliens without a military? You'll be sorry when xenobacteria are shooting laser beams at your family.

  4. Deep underground = inhospitable? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >> Amend hopes to drop probes deep underground in some of the world's most inhospitable locations over the next few years

    Where? Beijing? Mexico City? Or the real kind of inhospitable like the Gobi desert or Antarctica? I'd think once you get far enough underground pretty much anyplace would be inhospitable...to humans.

  5. Ugh, more Mars love by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish I had a few hundred million to push NASA out to Encelaedus or Europa. I bet we could just take samples of water spewed up from below to find evidence of life it it exists on either moon.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  6. Re:Jesus Christ by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    hah, think of what the last 75 years have brought us: nuclear weapons, ICBM, satellites, lasers that can shoot down aircraft, rail guns, bioweapons, genetic engineering......now you're talking about a species centuries advanced from ours that can not only travel interstellar space but wage war on that scale? wouldn't matter if we had a military or not, we'd be dead meat before we even knew we were being attacked.

  7. Mars life will be DNA based by Invisible+Now · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Panspermia is the theory that life is ubiquitous and travels from planet to planet and star to star. Less unlikely than it seems. For example, dormant spores trapped in salt crystals 25 million years old rejuvenated themselves when released. Life is hardy.

    Which of three theories seems on the right side of Occam's Razor:
        That life is unique to Earth (where it is all DNA/RNA based)?
        That life originates in novel non-DNA based ways independently on each planet?
        or that DNA-based life is mobile, seeds planets from above, and then evolves to suit each new environment?

    (Wait, I think that could be a Slahdot poll...)

    I believe we will find the same is true for life in the the seas of Europa, and elsewhere, too.

    --

    "Knowing everything doesn't help..."

    1. Re:Mars life will be DNA based by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Interesting

      James Lovelock pointed out in the sixties that viewed from space, it would immediately be apparent that earth and life. The prescence of huge amounts of gases which are not stable distinguishes from all other planets in the solar system. He predicted that Mars was in fact dead (before the Viking landers). The idea was that if life had got a foothold, it would probably have managed a similar totally transforming expansion over millions of years. Life that does not leave a big footprint wouldn't seem very much like the life we know from Earth.

      You got to admit, it's held up for a long time. Viking sondes found no life on Mars. OK, maybe there used to be life on Mars, at least microbial life? Newer sondes with better instruments find no evidence of that either. If there was, wow, it's done an exceptionally good job of dying out without trace (considering the extremophiles we know from Earth). Now maybe there's life deep in the crust?

      Maybe not. And maybe still more excuses will be made if that too fails to pan out.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  8. This would be the least interesting Martian life. by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At this point, we've learned enough about the hardiness and versatility of microbes that I would frankly be surprised if we found a completely sterilized Mars. In the history of the planet, many rocks knocked loose from Earth have landed there, and we know many organisms that could have survived the whole trip. If absolutely nothing took root, I would consider that a mild surprise. With extremophiles being found at pretty much everywhere we looked, we should be ready to find terrestrial extremophiles living even on Mars. That's definitely worth a few articles and TV specials, but it wouldn't really change the way we see the universe. Much more exciting would be to find Martian life of a totally independent genesis. Somehow I find that deeply unlikely, given that life genesis seems to only have happened once even in a place as comfy as Earth.

  9. Re:Jesus Christ by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    Well, enjoy your status as a second tier nation in a couple of hundred years while everyone else is running around the solar system claiming its resources.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  10. Re:This would be the least interesting Martian lif by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Life happened when Earth was in general far far less comfy to life than it is now. Mars likely had similar conditions very early on, but for a number of reasons (lower gravity, lack of magnetic field), it lost the thick atmosphere that would have made liquid water possible for extended periods of time on its surface. The hypothesis is that Mars may have evolved a biosphere during that period when it possessed a dense atmosphere and liquid water. In that case, even after most of the atmosphere disappeared, some portion of the biosphere that had adapted to living deep underground would have continued on even after the surface of the planet had been rendered completely uninhabitable.

    And, of course, we do not know for certain that the entire surface is uninhabitable. We have a damned small sample size, and have landed no probes in places like Valles Marineris, where the atmosphere is considerably denser and liquid water may last longer (we have observed fog there). If I was looking for life closer to the surface, I'd bee doing it in the deepest points of Valles Marineris.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  11. Re:Jesus Christ by only_human · · Score: 4, Funny

    For all we know, we might be more popular than Meercat Manor.

  12. Re:Jesus Christ by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's called investing in the future. I'm sure that building all those aqueducts in various Roman provinces cost the Republic, and later the Empire, vast amounts of coin that if it could not be directly gained, had to be borrowed. The plus side was prosperous cities that were major economic generators. This idea that the only thing any state should worry about is the nebulous creature known as "fiscal responsibility" is pretty strange, first of all because the term has real meaning. Borrowing money to build infrastructure like highways will certainly throw major liabilities on a government's balance sheet, but no one seriously says that the only measure of fiscal responsibility should be liabilities.

    Look at this way. At some point in the next century or two, the major industrial powers will likely begin some sort of race for solar system resources. But that race will not be built out of nothing. It will be built out of a whole series of major investments, many (if not most) by governments. Each one of the stepping-stone advances may seem on paper at that moment to be an utter waste of time and money, but at the end of the day, being in that race is only made possible by having made those other investments along the way.

    If the US wishes to sit it out, that's fine. In short and medium terms, it will be a net gain, and give some temporary economic advantage over the Europeans, the Chinese and the Japanese (and, pretty soon, Brazil, I'll wager). But at some point, when they've made advances far in advance of the Apollo program, the US will have to rebuild what it gave up in the name "fiscal responsibility", and it may find that that is a lot easier said than done.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.