Slashdot Mirror
New Revenue Model For Low Budget Films: Lawsuits
conspirator23 writes "A 64-year-old retired English teacher is being sued by a copyright troll for illegal BitTorrent downloading of a motion picture. Perhaps it's not all that shocking in the current era. That is, until we learn that rather than protecting something like Game of Thrones, the plaintiff is accusing Emily Orlando of Estacada, Oregon of downloading Maximum Conviction, a direct-to-video action flick released earlier this year starring Steven Segal and ex-WWE wrestler Steve Austin. Voltage Pictures is demanding $7500 from Emily and 370 other defendants. If all the defendants were to pay the demands, Voltage would gross over $2.75 million, minus legal fees. Who needs Kickstarter?"
As you might expect, Mrs. Orlando had never heard of BitTorrent before receiving the legal threat, and she lives in an area with dynamic IP assignments. This is the same company who has been going after file-sharers by the thousands since 2010.
This company (from TFA) *is* the maker of The Hurt Locker.
Perfect - she's already done that! What's the next step for her now?
+1 Disagree
It was not a financial success because, interestingly, people in the US thought it was a commie propaganda movie
Nothing surprises me any longer about a country that could elect Ronald Regan and George W Bush as heads of State.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it