Slashdot Mirror


Judge Slams Apple-Motorola Suit As 'Business Strategy'

jfruh writes "Faced with an Apple vs. Motorola lawsuit that involves 180 claims and counterclaims across 12 patents, a judge in Florida has thrown up his hands and accused both companies of acting in bad faith. Claiming the parties' were engaged in 'obstreperous and cantankerous conduct', he said that the lawsuit was part of 'a business strategy that appears to have no end.'"

4 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Good by drinkydoh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fighting is stupid. You should just concentrate on making a great product, just like Apple does. Note that, Motorola/Google, and stop fighting.

  2. No sir by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is he implying that Apple's business strategy is somehow tied into massive, pervasive, and obvious patent trolling? No sir, simply won't buy it. Everyone knows they invented rounded corners.

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
  3. I would have thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    that the judge blurting out what is obvious to anyone following the case is a clear violation of protocol.

  4. New Strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The judge should ask Apple if it plans to be in business 200 years from today.
    When Apple says yes, the judge should suspend the suit and schedule another hearing in 100 years.
    To an immortal corporation, a "speedy trial" can easily be measured in centuries.