Slashdot Mirror


Hacker Modifies Facebook Home To Work On All Android Devices

An anonymous reader writes "That was quick. Mere hours after Facebook Home arrived on Google Play, the launcher has been modified to remove the device-specific limitation. This means you can use the latest Facebook service on any Android device. The brilliant hackers at XDA Developers have done it again. This particular hack was performed by XDA Senior Member theos0o; who provides details and download links."

10 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. Great! by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks hackers, now Facebook will be able to more effectively track all Android users equally! It's so thoughtful for you to effectively to their crummy job for them...

    1. Re:Great! by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      FaceBook is still voluntary, as far as I can tell.

    2. Re:Great! by jhoegl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So is an Address, but yet I must have one.
      Now I get a bunch of shit in the mail, people knocking on my door, and cars driving by with loud bass.
      Clearly, life is voluntary.

    3. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps a "friend" that moved out of town, and didn't provide you with their new contact details, doesn't want to be found by you ;)
      Thanks Facebook!

  2. As E.T. would say by toygeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Face-book-phooone-Hooome

  3. I'd like to see this guy's hat. by lxs · · Score: 4, Funny

    It must be the biggest, blackest hat in the history of the world.

  4. I never ask this, but.... by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Usually I am happy to admire the skill and ability of hackers in doing something interesting, and never ask "Why?" or what practical purpose it might help with. I am satisfied to admire the hack for the hack's sake.

    But here, why? Do you really want Facebook Home? This hack is like saying, "oh, the Sony Rootkit only ran on Windows, let's port it to OSX so macboys can enjoy it too." Why would you do that? There are much more interesting things to do with your time. Like vacuuming your floor or something.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:I never ask this, but.... by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Informative

      But here, why? Do you really want Facebook Home?

      Me? I don't. My sister? Her friends? Hell some of my friends? Yes.

      While you and I may disagree with Facebook, how it works and what it stands for there are people out there who use it for everything. I mean EVERYTHING. You're not on their Facebook list? They won't call you to invite you to a party. SMS? How quaint, just use Facebook messaging from any device and talk to multiple people at a time.

      There are literally people I can only talk to via Facebook because that is their mindset. They will line up to try Facebook Home.

  5. Still Using Forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see that the XDA community is STILL doing EVERYTHING in a god-damn forum. Nope. No code repositories here! Just download this link from this thread on this forum and have fun!

    1. Re:Still Using Forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's because much of what gets accomplished by the developers at XDA falls into the uneasy demilitarized zone where the manufacturers pretend it doesn't exist and look the other way, but technically much of what would be hosted would have at least bits and pieces that could be considered infringement of their respective trademarks, copyrights, and/or patents (example: tweaked & modded Samsung and HTC firmware).

      Due to the way trademark law works (vigorously fight all infringement, or risk losing it altogether), if XDA openly hosted files a-la-Github, they might as well paint a target on their metaphorical forehead. Likewise, as long as the files get hosted by services that are slightly shady, the manufacturers can rationalize it as an act of anonymous piracy that's largely beyond their control. If it were hosted at XDA itself, their lawyers would be firing off DMCA takedown notices (or worse) within minutes of posting.

      Manufacturers are more willing to look the other way when obtaining and flashing modified firmware involves jumping through a half-dozen annoying hoops. The more convenient it becomes, and the more likely less-technical end users are to use it, the more they (or at least their lawyers) feel compelled to fight for the sake of liability- and tech-support avoidance.

      It would be nice, of course, if we could just go out and buy best-of-breed Android hardware with open drivers and unlocked bootloaders, but the sad fact is that Google's Nexi haven't been bleeding-edge best-of-breed devices since the Nexus One (the GNex could have been, had they not squandered 6 months of exclusivity on Verizon, but by the time the GSM GNex came out, the S3 was just a month or two away), so if you want best of breed hardware with hackable firmware now, there isn't really an alternative to buying the latest phone from Samsung or HTC & using hacked and tweaked variants of the official firmware for 3-9 months until Cyanogen, AOSP, and AOKP catch up & have fully-working versions (as opposed to versions with broken Camera, GPS, 4G, or other subsystems that seem to inevitably break with every new version of Android).