Slashdot Mirror


A Critique of the Boston Bombing News Coverage (Video)

David Coursey has spent a lot of his life as a journalist, specializing in IT coverage for most of it. He's written for ZDNet and eWeek, Forbes, and other well-known publications, and has had his stories linked from Slashdot more than a few times over the years. What he is not as well known for is his expertise as an EMT, a field he has been in as both a volunteer and professional since the rocks in California (where he lives) were still soft enough that the Flintstones used them as pillows. He and I were chatting on Facebook yesterday, and I realized that David's views on media coverage of the recent Boston Marathon bombings might be worth sharing. Do you think what he's saying is valid? Do you agree or disagree with him? Or some of each?

6 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Worst. Coverage. Ever. by fnj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Coverage has been one completely bogus claim after another, always from unnamed sources.

    Blast from second floor inside building. Oh wait, no it wasn't.
    Two bombs placed in trash cans. Oh wait, no they weren't.
    Authorities have found and "blown up" a number of other bombs. Oh wait, no they haven't.
    A dark skinned suspect has been arrested. Oh wait, there is no such suspect.

  2. Jon Stewart Said It Well by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't seem to play the video and there's no transcript but I was impressed with Jon Stewart's drawing and quartering of CNN's coverage. He hit the nail on the head of what "journalistic integrity" has fallen to. Jon Stewart was saying CNN had an 'exclusive' story on the arrest ... exclusive because there was no arrest.

    Get on Twitter, say some stuff that sounds legit. Sit back and watch it retweeted, then it'll hit the blogs and finally the 'news.' And all they have to do is try to track down the original source (you) but they seldom do. And that's what "crowdsourced" news has come to. Whenever someone heralds the amazing results from crowdsourced news, it's always post hoc cherry picked results of an actual first hand account or someone who got it right. They seldom look at the entire volume of tweets prior to what we know is true and what is conjecture/wrong.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  3. transcript or GTFO by X0563511 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I wanted video I'd be on Youtube.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. Re:Can you stop the 24/7 coverage now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The concentration on the Boston bombing is ridiculous considering that Iraq had twenty car bombings that same day. It's ridiculous that they dropped every single other news story to cover only the Boston story, and then repeated the same five minutes' worth of information 24 hours a day. They may as well have shut off the antenna at that point.

  5. Re:The big rush by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We need a story now, quick. We need something to put on airtime because our marketing is calling around our advertising clients to see who wants to bid on the next hour of airtime. The big need to get something up quick, even if it's very low quality, such as a poorly recorded video interview without a transcript... oh, wait...

    Back on Sept 11, 2001, the media were far worse. Network and news outlets on television and the web were trying to outbid each other on the body count. 5,000, 15,000, could be has high as 40,000. Really appalling. They didn't know what else to do in their own confusion, but play the horrifying videos over and over and try to make the whole thing as grim as they could, to keep viewers glued and ultimately numbing them.

    I have a book with collections of newspaper front pages from December 7, 8, 9 ... 1941. Back in that day the news focused on what was known, body counts were off the pages for the first few days and then only included known dead. The final tally wasn't truly known in the news for almost one year. News moved slower, people gave themselves more time to think.

    The idiocy of the AP running a rumor of an arrest and showing how quick every other outlet is willing to parrot this and seek confirmation later, showed what a swarm of locusts mentality there is in the media these days.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  6. Re:No info + 24/hr news cycle = failure by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    CNN/NBC/Fox all want to be the first to get the story out. No matter what, for some reason being first though bad info - is good.

    In other words, the fourth estate has been reduced to the level of a slashdot first post.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.